Grimm MU1 Streamer - Really "The Best"?


I've recently become interested in the Grimm MU1.  While reviews of top end players from Innuos, Aurender and Antipodes and others are typically all very positive, the tone of the many pro reviews of the Grimm MU1 go far, far beyond, with some reviews resorting to using superlatives and gushing of positive system transformation and not being able to stop listening to material, etc..  HiFi Advice and Steve Huff (actually calls it "magic") have such reviews.

Given the delay in availability of the Innuos Pulsar which I'm told will be better than my current Zenith Mk3 + PhoenixUSB reclocker, I am interested in replacing my streaming setup with a one-box solution that includes a high-precision clock.  The new streamer will continue to feed my Gryphon Diablo 300's DAC module, which I have no interest in replacing.

I'm actually a fan of Innuos, after they improved the sound of my Zenith with firmware updates and after I added their PhoenixUSB reclocker. I appreciate this commitment to improving sound quality which is why I was so interested in the Pulsar.

The trigger for considering an upgrade is not for improved sound, but rather, to solve some issues I have with too many Audioquest power cords coiled and clumped together. I will get to lose one of them and one of my USB cords with a one-box streamer. I've noticed my sound is very sensitive to positioning of my AC cords and find I often need to re-adjust the PC feeding my amp to get proper sounding vocals at center stage.  One of my subs also seems to be picking up AC noise when the crossover is set above 60Hz. The second trigger is simply system simplification, removing one box.  All that said I don't really have any complaints regarding sound, and the PhoenixUSB reclocker truly did improve the sound of my Zenith.

While the Grimm MU1 has it's 4X upsampling up it's sleeve with reviewers absolutely glowing over this feature and it's extreme ability to separate tones to the left, right, front, and back far better than the rest, I don't see that Grimm has gone to any lengths with regard to power supply management in the way other brands do including Innuos. The MU1's ultra-simplistic interior doesn't bug me, but the lack of transformers and power management makes me wonder....

Are there any updates from folks who have directly compared the MU1 vs similarly classed streamers from the competition?  Did you find it to be as revelatory as the pro reviewers found it? And, how does it compare to other streamers with it's 4X upsampling disabled?  Does it sound like it suffers from it's lack of power management?  I do see that the clock should be very good...

 

 

nyev

Hello @thyname ,  there may be some designed coincidence if GTT is your dealer or distributor.  Bill Parish of GTT is a good friend of Joe Kubala, and also a big YG dealer.  Both have been to my home for delivery and set up (and checking out my train layout).  Bill always features K-S cables at his studio or at shows.  Interesting this year is that GTT is featuring Goya Speakers at Axpona with Audionet Stern and Heisenbergs, MM Tambaqui, Grimm mu1, and Kubala Sosna cables.

maybe soon there will be a coincidence with Giya loudspeakers and K-S cables?🧐. 

Post removed 

@nyev  Thanks for the additional comments on the perceived midrange dip with your Innuos setup. When I think of what makes a system sound warm, I think particularly about some emphasis in how it is handling upper bass and lower mids. So if an Innuos server/streamer (like the Statement) is described as warm by a reviewer, then I don't immediately think of a dip in the lower mids. Also, when you describe your Innuos gear as sounding pleasantly smooth, I think of a lack of emphasis in the upper mids or highs to the point where brightness or harshness is de-emphasized. Associated with this smoothness may be some deemphasis of higher frequency detail, including the harmonics of instruments (like guitar) that produce their fundamental tones in the upper bass and lower mids. Having said this, I wouldn't be at all surprised if both the MU1 and the Innuos gear have a fairly flat frequency response overall, even though they don't sound exactly the same in tonal balance and soundstaging.

And speaking of tonal balance, @fastfreight makes a good point about how cables can affect the sound of any of the gear we're discussing here. There is certainly the obvious difference that Innuos uses USB to connect to a DAC, while the MU1 uses a different DAC input and a different type of cable. In my own system, I use primarily Cardas cables, which are known to support a full and rich midrange, so my system may sound a little different than yours even when I'm using much the same Innuos gear. 

 

@fastfreight , @sdl4 there is a cable difference for sure, which I have thought about. I am temporarily using a very low end Cardas AES cable on the MU1 (the old green Cardas AES cable, not the current one. With my Innuos setup I have Audioquest Diamond USB cables. I did try swapping out the Diamond USB cables with generic USB cables and I still noticed the same tonal differences between Innuos and the MU1 (but the Innuos sound became inferior in other ways).

@sdl4 I agree it’s likely that both have fairly neutral measured frequency responses. Our ears are very sensitive to tiny changes in tonal balance which has a massive impact on how we perceive a piece of equipment. Maybe “smooth” is not as good as “relaxed” to describe what I perceive with Innuos vs the MU1. Because it’s all relative, the bass, upper mids and high frequencies “pop out” in a very pleasing way with Innuos, and the upper end detail is so easy to hear. Again, and the expense of the “meatier” tones of the midrange which are not as easy to hear with detail. Because of this, I think that things like electric guitars sound smoother with less texture and detail in the body of the tone. Of note this difference in tonal balance is the most profound of the differences I hear between Innuos and Grimm. The next biggest difference is the more gentle delivery of Innuos vs the more propulsive and energetic presentation of the MU1.  And lastly the smallest difference I hear is the bit of added texture, focus and detail that the MU1 offers over my Innuos setup.  But these last differences are far smaller than I originally had thought as I was getting them conflated with the tonal balance differences at first.

@lalitk , cool you met Eelco! Since he’s referenced this thread to me I would have asked him if sales of MU1’s are up because of it, just out of curiosity! You should also have asked him about the details of the next firmware release - I think you in particular would be very interested in the major new features than are coming. Eelco asked me not to share these details online since it’s still possible these features may have issues in testing.

 

“I have Nordost Odin2 for the rest of my system”

@svenjosh in that case I’m pretty sure I know which AES cable will win your shootout :)

Nevertheless, let us know how your testing with the Sablon and Jorma go!

The 1.5m minimum for digital cables is supposedly required to account for something to do with the synchronization between source and destination.  At least with USB cables, if you look it up you’ll find people talk about “reflections”.  I’ve not attempted to understand it; I’ve just noted the really big improvement when you go from a 1m USB to 1.5m or 2m.  Mark at Sablon told me he had heard this too.