FR64 cartridge suggestions


Been out of the loop for quite a few years due to some 'life' events, with system in storage.

I have been able to pull my system from storage, and last year worked enough overtime to upgrade or purchase new equipment, but I have not upgraded my turntable/tonearm/cartridge yet.

My turntable is a Technics SL1000 MKII which for those not familiar, is the Technics SP10 MKII turntable mounted on a factory plinth.
I have two Technics B-500 bases with an 'E' armwand and 'H' armwand that I don't use.
The tonearm I do use is a Fidelity Research FR64, so I need a low compliance cartridge.
The cartridge I used last is a vintage Fidelity Research FR-1 MK3 F, which needs to be re-tipped, and I will do so once I get a replacement.

The rest of the system includes:

Zesto 1.2 Andros tube phono stage
Zesto 1.5 tube preamp
Quicksilver V4 tube amps (new KT150 version)
Green Mountain Audio Continuum 3 speakers
JL Audio 113 Fathom subwoofers (pair)

Curious what cartridges other high mass tonearm owners are using, especially those who use Fidelity Research FR64/66 tonearms.

Looking for cartridges under $2000 USD at most.. probably should spend half that.

I have over 20K records, so I am very anxious to get this back into service.

Really curious about suggestions and thanks in advance.



128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xrich121

Lucky me I never become ''master machinist''. So I see afterwards that

my ''solution'' produces more problems than it solves. The problem is

the nose of the screw. If an ''case'' or ''cover'' on the nose can correct

the  (wrong) thickness of the nose (=1 mm?) the problem  can be solved. 

I.e, the thread is 2mm but the nose is smaller while the vertical slot is

also 2mm. 

RE-surfacing an old thread here. Wondering if someone can tell me about head-shell compatibility with these FR64 tone arms?. Can I use regular headshells like I would on a technics 1200g arm for example? . If so what can be said about the native FR headshell eg- is it recommended?. So far I can just assume its a weighty headshell.   

Also as I am digging up this thread does anyone have anything recent to share on cartridge synergy with these arms?

I am considering swapping out the Technics 1200G arm with FR-64s to use with a Koetsu Rosewood standard. 

RE-surfacing an old thread here. Wondering if someone can tell me about head-shell compatibility with these FR64 tone arms?. Can I use regular headshells like I would on a technics 1200g arm for example? . If so what can be said about the native FR headshell eg- is it recommended?. So far I can just assume its a weighty headshell.

I’ve used many headshells with 64fx and 64S. All have worked fine so don’t stress to much:

  • Ortofon LH-9000, LH-8000, LH-6000
  • Ikeda IS-2, IS-2T
  • Koetsu magnesium
  • Koetsu vintage wood / metal (1980s?)
  • FR RS-141, RS-121 (stock 64fx), RS-10. Also have the stock 64S shell but never used it

The FR are good but I don’t see a need to favor them over others, except for aesthetic. The Ikeda is the best quality but also heaviest at 20g. The LH-8000 and RS-10 are good to shave off some mass. Some of the Ortofons have a tiny bit more rotational play (azimuth) when locking in, so you have to be careful to make sure you’re locking them in to the right azimuth. I like Ortofons the least, honestly, but they still work OK.

For cartridge matching - these arms are ideal with Koetsu. They "wake" the Koetsus up, giving maximum dynamics and the most vibrant midrange (which is the point of a Koetsu). If you want to see how much difference an arm makes, take a Koetsu from an FR64 to a Clearaudio carbon fiber arm (Universal 12" VTA in my case) - on the latter, it sounds completely dead and dull, robbed of all life. I don’t think it’s just the mass matching, either - that carbon fiber arm sounds sterile with many brands of cartridges.

They’re also excellent with top Shelters (Accord, Harmony). The Accord in particular is wonderfully musical and balanced. I like it better than more expensive Harmony, which tries to increase resolution over Accord at the expense of "thinning out" the sound. Still good, but I really prefer the Accord, which was sadly discontinued due to lack of interest.

They’re also excellent with wood-body Benzes. I prefer the iron cross models over ruby plate models, but that’s probably down to me favoring SUTs over active MC gain.

They do OK with Ortofons. But it’s not my favorite. Windfeld (MC and Ti) always ended up leaving me kind of meh. Jubilee MC sucked. A90 is actually really good and interesting sounding, but perhaps a bit more lean in mids and bass than I prefer long term. The Cadenza Bronze is a warmer model than usual for Ortofon, and this one truly matches "100%" A+ with the FR64fx. That Bronze (and its predecessor Kontrapunkt "c") is probably my favorite thing Ortofon made lol.

On a bang-for-buck basis, the FR64fx with Shelter Accord (if you can find one) or Benz Wood S (M or L) or Zebrawood (M or L) or Cadenza Bronze would be my choice. I think I still prefer the Benz and Accord over Bronze, but it’s not far off.

The 64S has been almost permanently occupied with my Koestu Blue Lace since I got it, so I haven’t experimented much on that arm. The Blue Lace is absolutely my best cart, but also the most expensive. When I did arm comparisons with a Koetsu Onyx, the 64S had a slight edge, but the 64fx was still close. 

My impression after decades of headshells and arm wands is that while most headshells can be mated to most arm wands, it is not the case that they are all cross-compatible. It’s a bit trial and error with low risk of error. One deal killer is location of the guide pin on the headshell collar. A few Japanese made headshells have either two guide pins (at 12 and 6 o’clock) or one that’s wrongly located to permit mating to your particular tonearm. Ortofon headshells mate well to my FR64S, if that helps.