Washington Post article on MoFi vs. Fremer vs. Esposito

The guy who wrote the article for the Washington Post has since been interviewed by Michael 45RPM on YouTube, and is available for viewing on his channel fyi. 

Want to share this article on wine tasting (relevant)

What concerns me most if that some members dont seem to think MoFi did anything wrong. Or at the very least, the sin was minor and really not really worth mentioning. 

I have found that usually the MoFi remasters arent the best pressings available. All MoFi I own were made prior to the "new" process. 

What to do, what to do...

Some can start with a lawsuit and hope to make money off of a product they claim to love and hobble the industry, somewhat, in the process. That would put some people out of work and drive up prices in an already competitive market, making what they've hoarded go up in value and sell it off on eBay, making a minor killing, all in the name of...., well, it's not being an audiophile.

All the best,
Nonoise

MoFi admits they only sold $9 million in records last year. So any lawsuit could potentially have them filing for bankruptcy, killing them for good. That’s the price you pay for not being upfront about your operations. 
 

It is a shame too, for had they been honest, the argument would be, which is better, DSD “analogue”, or authentic analogue. Will there be more DSD companies starting up to enter the fray? Well, maybe at least 1. 
 

The moral of the story is, if you lie, you die. Rather blunt, but truthful.