A DIY Swarm-based Distributed Bass Array for SOTA Bass


State of the art bass turns out to be a lot more affordable - and achievable- than you think. It just requires a new approach.

The physical realities of low bass in small rooms is discussed by Earl Geddes in "Why Multiple Subs?" http://www.gedlee.com/Papers/multiple%20subs.pdf

Basically, a 20Hz wave is 56.5 feet long. So any bass that low is bound to bounce off a wall long before it even becomes a full wave. Then as it bounces back it runs into itself, either canceling or reinforcing itself, and this all happens even before one full wave can be produced. This is just physics, or acoustics if you prefer, and happens in every room and always regardless of speaker design. As Geddes has shown the shape of the room hardly even matters. At residential sizes they are all pretty much the same. So the conventional approach of one or two subs cannot possibly work. It never could. It was doomed by the physical and acoustical constraints of home-sized rooms.

With four however it becomes almost trivially easy. Not in the sense of being perfect. Its not magic. The quality and performance of the four speakers still matters. But its trivially easy in the sense that the improvement inherent in using four is so great as to swamp these details.

Or at least that is the conclusion that led me to build my own distributed bass array.


The Distributed Bass Array

The system I built is based on the Audiokinesis Swarm subwoofer system http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/audiokinesis-swarm-subwoofer-system/ with help from Audiokinesis himself, Duke Lejeune.

It uses four 10" Morel drivers https://www.parts-express.com/morel-ultimate-uw-1058-10-subwoofer--297-130

These drivers at the time included sealed 1.25 cf cabinets. These go together easily with minimal woodworking skill and tools, but that would mean four sealed cabinets. Duke suggested building two ported would give the added option of being able to easily tweak the bass response if needed by simply plugging a port or two.

With ported enclosures there is a relationship between volume, port dimensions, and tuning frequency. Basically, a bigger cabinet volume, longer port, and smaller port diameter yield a lower tuning frequency. A smaller diameter port doesn’t need to be as long. But it needs to be big enough to pass the volume of air quietly, without chuffing. Just a few of the many details designers like Duke know in depth. Me, I used one of the on-line port length calculators. Which just happened to give the same answer as Duke gave me. So I know the calculator was right.

As a result, two subs are 16" sealed cubes, and two are 16x16x24 ported cabs, with 3" diameter by 20" long ports. According to Parts Express this results in an f3 of 52 Hz for the sealed subs, while according to the on-line calculator the ported subs are tuned to 20 Hz. I take all this with a big grain of salt or as an estimated starting point at best, as room reinforcement at low frequencies is so big a factor. The goal is simply to get in the ball park, or close enough for a little port plugging, phase adjusting, maybe even a touch of EQ to do the rest.


The Amps

Duke’s Swarm system uses the Dayton subwoofer amp https://www.parts-express.com/dayton-audio-sa1000-subwoofer-amplifier-rack-mountable--300-811
While one amp would do nicely, because almost all bass is mono, still there is an advantage in terms of flexibility in using two. The Dayton amps are adjustable for crossover, level, and phase. A main reason a DBA works so well is the four source locations results in a smoothing of modes. Another factor is the way we perceive the size of the space we are in is related to the mixing or randomness of the lowest frequencies. The idea is that being able to adjust phase can further smooth or blend modes resulting in a greater sensation of being in a larger space.

At this point however I had a bit of a problem. My Melody 880I amp has no pre-out while the Dayton amps have only line-level inputs.

There are plenty of Line Out Converters but they all look cheesy to me. So instead I opted to convert one of my unused RCA inputs to a Line Out.

Converting speaker output to line level is a simple two resistor circuit. One 10k drops the speaker level, one 1k provides a little impedance to the outboard component. http://www.epanorama.net/circuits/speaker_to_line.html With a foot or two of spare silver wire and $2 worth of resistors soldered inside the Melody retains its stock look and is ready to drive the Dayton sub amps.


The Setup

This is the hardest part with the conventional approach, figuring out where exactly to put the sub to get smooth flat bass. Okay, technically not hard- impossible! With four however...

I spread the four around the room- near the left corner of the front wall, a little further than that from the front corner of the right wall, the remaining two on each side a little further back than the sweet spot. Fairly random. They all face the wall.

One run of ordinary 14 ga wire, at least for now. The two 8 ohm subs on each amp wired in series is 16 ohms, or 4 ohms in parallel. I tried both. The bass is a little more taut and defined at 16 compared to 4. Either way the result is leagues beyond a conventional sub.


The Sound

Finally! Setting up the Talon Roc the DBA replaced I knew would be a chore so for that I used a warbled test CD. Having read so much I was so sure the DBA would not be like that this time that I put on Bela Fleck’s Flight of the Cosmic Hippo. This track features some incredible low bass. Bass that trailed off to nothingness with my Talon Roc. Bass so low I had only heard it done even halfways decent one time- in the gigantic basement of a speaker designer (Linaeum) in Beaverton.

The DBA, speakers plopped down with zero effort, no cones, plain old lamp cord, and only the crudest guesstimate levels set, reproduced the Cosmic low bass of the Hippo so perfectly I could hardly believe it. Everyone talks about sub compatibility, matching, phasing, yada yada- forget about it. If my experience is anything to go by just plop four subs down, sit back, and enjoy. Try not to giggle. Seriously. Try.

The bass from these things is just crazy fast, articulate, powerful and smooth. Uncannily so. The Absolute Sound review above describes this so beautifully I have little to add. What I will add, as amazing as the obviously low powerful bass that you’re aware of hearing is, what is even more amazing is the effect of the very unobviously unpowerful low bass that you’re not.

What I mean is, several times now I have been listening to music that seemed to have no low bass content at all. Why then does it sound so much better? What is the DBA doing??? Sometimes, as with piano, it makes sense. The piano is a physically large instrument. The lowest A on a modern piano is about 27.5 Hz. With string bass its 31Hz to 41Hz, four or five string, depending. All likely with a physical presence that extends a bit lower than their fundamental notes. So with a little thought its easy enough to see why these sound better with the DBA. But what about the rest? Why am I getting the sense of the whole recording being bigger, better, more real and present in the room?

Or should I say, not that the recording is in my room but that I am in the recording room? Duke and others have talked about a sense of envelopment. Something I have experienced for a very long time going back to my first concert hall experience as a youth is the unique sonic signature of large spaces. If you’ve been to a concert you know the feeling. You walk in and not only your ears but your whole body feels the sensation of really, really, REALLY, I’m talking subterranean low bass.

Now honestly, the DBA is not that. Maybe with four 15" subs it would be. If its even on the recording to begin with. Not the point. The point is, the DBA is at least getting to the point where this is where you have to go to try and describe it. Its that good.
128x128millercarbon

The sealed subs are 16" cubes and look like these

 

The ported subs are the same except 8" taller to get the extra volume for a ported enclosure. I wouldn't bother with this again, would just do all of them the smaller sealed cabs. Mine were a package deal, free cabinets is hard to beat! The package deals they have now are good, but use a lesser quality driver.

For reference, the Morel 10" is a much better driver than in the Swarm. Duke himself told me so, and he would be the one to know. So you can decide for yourself, but you will get excellent results from the current package deals, they are probably just about level with a Swarm.

I don't do measurements. My ears and butt tell me all I need to know. Read Tim's comments above, he has a Swarm which is roughly equivalent to what you will have with one of the 10" sub packages and one Dayton SA1000 amp.  

 

Hello, and thanks for a very interesting thread. I've been following it for quite a while and contemplating doing something like this but haven't had the time or resources to pursue it. Can anybody comment on the viability of using mini DSP along with a 250 watt per channel amp to power at least three subs. The amp is an Acurus A250 that was professionally modified to be dual mono with an improved power supply, etc. It's quite a beast but I'm not positive it could run multiple subs. I have no experience with subs, and never thought I needed them with my Fritz Rev7 SE speakers and relatively small, open on one side, 12x12 room. Lately I've been rethinking, though.

Other option would be powered subs, possibly even Bluetooth ones for convenience, but even though the sound quality bar might be lower for bass I don't know how many corners could be cut before it would muck up the overall sound too much. I don't want to end up just cheesing up my system.

Any advice?

I know Fritz and enjoy his speakers. Bass response is very good. The goal of a distributed bass array is to get smooth and fast bass, not necessarily deeper bass. The Acurus could do the trick and power the bass drivers. Use an active crossover like mini DSP to cut off the mains at 100 Hz. Then use 3 passive bass woofers to handle the low frequencies, 4 is actually better wired in parallel assuming the Acurus doubles as impedance is halved.. I started with four 8" drivers which I think could be useful in your room. You could try 10" drivers as well. I don't like active subs but that's just me.

Reporting back on my swarm experience. I recently got a DIY Pass B1 Korg NuTube preamp with dual outputs and a dual mono clone of the First Watt F5 to use with my main speakers. This has admittedly confounded my experience of the swarm, as have some new power cables. For the swarm, an Acurus A250 is bridged (~500 wpc) and receiving signal from the preamp through a DSP that has the low pass filters set at 80Hz with a 48db per octave Linkwitz-Reilly filter. Feel free to scoff at my approach to the subs. I bought three subwoofers off Craigslist (there are so many to choose from--check it out). I bypassed all the internal amps and connected the speaker terminals directly, then passed wire under the floor to the amp. For this I used Blue Jeans 10awg wire, removing the outside jacket to get single wires since they were all wired in series. The front sub is a forward firing JBL which had a wimpy (and of course crappy) internal amp but used the driver used in their more expensive models. This was a 10". On a side wall is a downward firing 8" Klipsch and on the back wall is a 8" Onkyo. There is no wall on the remaining side of the room, and really no place to put another sub so there are only three. All have decent drivers but cabinets that are mediocre with no insulation inside. The sound, along with the sound of the new amps, is amazing. I can't really separate the two but when I turn off the swarm and put on certain tracks the difference is clear. Viva la swarm! I still need to spend some time fine tuning and maybe bringing in some parametric EQ but overall I am sold.