Dipole speakers, subwoofers and that rear wall


I own modern quad dipole speakers (2912s). I’ve heard many stories about speaker position, but never something that rang as fully logical to me. I can imagine 3 choices:

 

1/ dipole pretty much against the wall, maybe slight toe-in. The reflecting sound will come quickly after the straight sound and might cancel out the direct wave

2/ dipole far from corner (I hear quad recommends 1.5m). Reflections will amplify the sound?

Both statements feel like they’re incomplete. Surely the frequency, or frequencieS being played matter a lot if the reflected sound is in phase (amplifies) or in antiphase (attenuates) the direct sound. I can imagine perfecting positioning for one frequency and its modes, but not for 20-20,000 hz full spectrum.

 

3/ Close the rear of the dipole or have sound-absorbing material behind the speaker

The third one seems somewhat more logical, since I can’t imagine a sinewave that’s being attenuated by a reflected wave being accurately-sine-y unless the reflection is exactly in counterphase with the frequency played.

But on the other hand, if I have an actual instrument that is somewhat reminiscent of an actual dipole (e.g. a snare drum pointing upward) will have similar reflections on the rear wall.

 

I guess it "feels" true that you don’t want to stuff a musician in a corner too much but I’m not sure if this will negatively impact his sound?

 

As for the second part, a proper subwoofer moves quite a bit of air, can that air damage a dipole eletrostatic speaker?

puntloos

 "Embrace it" in a tuned chamber ...

What is a "tuned chamber?" I've never heard of this room treatment.

It can sound wonderful, but NEVER accurate ... I had IRS Betas for 20 years. Wonderful speakers for the money. I did everything to those speakers. ... I really liked the servo bass columns.

Yup, the IRS bass columns can be terrific. I'm still using my IRS Beta system. I sometimes makes my own recordings, so I know that they can be reasonably accurate.

If Infinity made a mistake with the IRS Betas, it was the degree of flexibility in the adjustments. That's a double-edged sword: Used properly, the system can sound fantastic. Used improperly and you get that "hi-fi" sound that quickly wears on the listener.

 

The ear does not perceive comb filter effects from reflections the same way a microphone registers them, so in general reflections are far more benign than they look "on paper". But if reflections arrive too early, they still can be detrimental to clarity. According to acoustic and psychoacoustic researcher David Griesinger, ten milliseconds of essentially reflection-free time is sufficient.

Sound travels approximately one foot per millisecond, so the implication of Griesnger’s finding is that ideally we’d want to position dipole speakers about five feet out from the front wall, which would result in a backwave reflection path length of ten feet, and a delay of about ten milliseconds.

In my experience, if dipoles (or bipoles) are placed less than 3 feet from the wall behind them, aggressively treating the backwave is usually a good idea. This can be absorption or diffusion or re-directing the reflection away from the listening area.

At distances between 3 and 5 feet it’s more of a judgment call as to whether or not you need to treat the backwave. Imo in general re-directing the reflection and/or diffusion are preferable to absorption.

Duke

dipole dealer, bipole manufacturer

What is a "tuned chamber?" I've never heard of this room treatment.

Instead of dipole, use both front and rear baffles and both are enclosed within the cabinet design. RM50 VMPS. There are a few more now. The old QLS Infinity.  NOT the RS OB design. RS1 & Bs and the 2 and 2Bs or the IRS series.

A boxes (or cabinet) with TWO active baffles, front and rear.

Tune the room?

Read my Handle.. Helmholtz. The only way to properly tune a room.. 

There is a guy that post here that uses the term "Embedding" he has 3 major areas. HE is very close on his design.. A little muddled in his room, BUT he did it by reading and experimenting. A brave endeavor by my standards. :-)

Helmholtz, I use adjustable slot resonators for above 120hz and adjustable tube traps for 120hz and below. All designed by SB/SAT. Oldhvymec's design, it works VERY well. I've used them for over 10 years. He's been at it for over 45 years. 

Curtains, Resonators and Tube traps. OHM bass system is the bomb. Ask him. He always helped me. I have one of his air ride decoupling systems from way back.

For clarity, do you mean the front wall???  

Think of it like this.  When you go to a performance, are the performers in front of you or in back?

Dipoles are unique and enjoyable speakers.  As noted above, embrace and don't destroy the rear wave.  Use diffraction, NOT absorptive surfaces on the front wall.  Why would you want to defeat what this design type is all about?  If you can't pull them well off the front wall you will miss out on what these speakers can do.

For me, in the final analysis, dipoles are fun but not always the most accurate.  But in the right room with the right music, well you may be a very happy camper indeed.

helmholtzsoul

> What is a "tuned chamber?" <

Instead of dipole, use both front and rear baffles and both are enclosed within the cabinet design. RM50 VMPS. There are a few more now. The old QLS Infinity ...

Oh, you mean "cabinet." That’s what most people call the box that holds speaker drivers.