Stratospheric audio gear prices


The more time I have under my belt pursuing quality audio, the more I realize that high audio gear prices have some basis in their quality. Yet there is a limit. When you buy a Ferrari the cost is high, but you can see the money involved in the design and parts. Many would argue that high quality audio gear is similar to the quality and design of a hyper-car. But when you look a the sheer quantity an complexity of this kind of car, there is no piece of audio gear that compares. To me, a piece of audio gear that costs as much as even an inexpensive car is just a manufacturer cashing in because they can. Can you imagine what audio manufacturers would want to charge for a piece of audio gear that was the size and weight of a car? Like $100 million.  I believe it just drives the whole market up and we end up getting a little bit suckered. This is all perhaps a little overstated. I guess I just want to shame audio manufacturers. I do understand that they are not charities, or here for the betterment of mankind. If you are not frustrated by this, good for you.  Here is a quote from a book about marketing. The reference is a victim of link rot. Nevertheless it has common information. 
  

"Premium Pricing

Premium pricing is the practice of keeping the price of a product or service artificially high in order to encourage favorable perceptions among buyers, based solely on the price. The practice is intended to exploit the (not necessarily justifiable) tendency for buyers to assume that expensive items enjoy an exceptional reputation or represent exceptional quality and distinction . A premium pricing strategy involves setting the price of a product higher than similar products . This strategy is sometimes also called skim pricing because it is an attempt to "skim the cream" off the top of the market. It is used to maximize profit in areas where customers are happy to pay more, where there are no substitutes for the product, where there are barriers to entering the market, or when the seller cannot save on costs by producing at a high volume. It is also called image pricing or prestige pricing.

 

Luxury has a psychological association with price premium pricing. The implication for marketing is that consumers are willing to pay more for certain goods and not for others. To the marketer, it means creating a brand equity or value for which the consumer is willing to pay extra. Marketers view luxury as the main factor differentiating a brand in a product category."

Source: Boundless. “Market Share.” Boundless Business Boundless, 26 May. 2016. Retrieved 07 Feb. 2017 from https://www.boundless.com/business/textbooks/boundless-business-textbook/product-and-pricing-strateg...

ericrt
So if the most expense gear is purchased, is that the best sound possible? Assuming a perfect listening environment that is?  My guess is it would sound good AF. 
Some if not many high end audio gear is manufactured in such small numbers, that is reminiscent to protype costs. Plus some is making things more expensive than needed to target those extremely wealthy.
In every piece of audio gear, there is a minimum standard to achieve excellent waveform amplification or transmission.  Cheap engineering won't get you there.  You have to pay the "man" (manufacturer) something for his brain power.  Now, how to know which manufacturer because you already said quality reproduction is only INDIRECTLY associated with the cost.  You have to form an accurate philosophy or goal and pursue that.  Start there and don't let anyone deter you.  There is no better answer because, otherwise, you will just endlessly waste money and never arrive at your goal
@sj00884. “So if the most expense gear is purchased, is that the best sound possible? ”

.

Good question. In general the more expensive the higher the potential capability of each component or system within the design goals. Very high end audio is highly reviewed by extremely experienced and talented reviewers. So, the cost tend to match pretty closely with the price. However all the components must be complementary, you can take three very expensive components that are not synergistic and have them sound terrible. Also, the design goals and listener values detail vs musicality... of coarse at the levels we are talking about they should have all. But my example is a $500K+ Wilson WAMM based system I hear that was clearly the best and simply jaw dropping holographic... if you have never heard one of these you absolutely must... it is unbelievable. But honestly I do not want that kind of sound. But clearly, if that is the kind of sound I was looking for I would have worked my butt of to get it.