Speaker upgrade


I would like to hear thoughts on upgrading my speakers. I am very happy with my current system, but am thinking of upgrading the speakers. Not made up my mind yet, but very close. I have changed my gears recently and deciding whether to keep my current speakers or try different.
I currently have Aerial acoustics 7T, with 2 REL S5/SHOs. Aerial acoustics 7T are one hell of a speaker, and I never thought I will change them: they are very neutral and transparent, which plays exactly what you feed them. I still think they are excellent and In fact, on many forums, I have constantly bragged about them and still do, for good reasons. But I guess, time has come to change. Looking for speakers with better resolution, big soundstage, organic and sweet mids. If I can get more of everything my 7T does, it will be a jackpot. Budget is < 35K (used OK).
I have thought of Magico S5 MK2, Vimberg Tonda, Marten Mingus, Rockport Avior II. Others include Von Shweikert VR55 and Vivid Audio Giya G1. Hard to audition all, but have heard S5 Mk2 and Rockport Avior II which are close top.
My other systems include, AF strumento no. 4 mk2 amps, VAC renaissance mk V pre-amp fed by Luxman D-10x (DAC/SACD player) and Antipodes CX/S30 (server/streamer). I use roon mostly and listen vocals, Jazz, classical, Indie Rock, contemporary instrumental and the likes. Room size is 17 x 14 and height is 10 feet. I have already done all room acoustics. Cables are Silversmith Fideliums (never going to change that) and Shunyata anaconda/python, TQ black diamond and AQ Hurricane.
romney80
romney80   I just saw you r response to my statement.  I did not mean to state my opinion as an absolute guide to follow.  To be more clear, since so many places no longer have actual stereo stores, I believe we must take others' listening opinions with the proverbial grain of salt, bu ttj=hen seek out a store or home demonstration, when possible.. An extreme example of where this feeling comes from can be found in the rants of how wonderful  everyone says his system is on the Audio Review site.  I am guilty of such.  We all are to some degree.  I did not mean to suggest that we ignore the opinions on Audiogon, especially since this community does have a lot of experience with many different products; however, we still need to be aware that many of us have not been exposed to a great number of products, and that we tend to like what we have.  As James Bonjiorno of Great American Sound (Ampzilla) warned us:  If we take six people with their own LP's and CD's to each other's homes, each system will sound best with the media of the owner of the system.  I like to add:  We buy systems to sound best on what we listen to, and vice versa.  We are all biased, and must remember that.  Good Luck with your search.  Cheers
Congrats on the MA pl500's. The MA of  old were too bright for my ears but the latest offerings, while I haven't heard them look to use a much better tweeter.
@danvignau i agree with you on how people think their gears are best. Everybody is guilty of that. Also, the fact that there is no one speaker that is perfect, no matter the price, says that there is subjective component and preference for certain qualities in sound. And add to that, the hard earned money you spent, you get attached to your “buys”. @steve59 the current model is no way close to being bright. They are very polite and very true to sound source.
How superior, and in what ways, are the MA Platinum II models to the original Platinum models?  The original Platinums are starting to appear on the used market at much more affordable prices. 
@mtrot I have not heard the older MAs. I have heard the current MA PL300II and PL500II, So, I cannot talk about the first generation PL models. I just commented to the post asking whether, these are bright and THEY ARE NOT. The MA PL500II, are very musical, very good bass, amazing soundstage, very good layering of instruments in space (like you are in music hall or opera), the best 3D imaging. They are on dark side, which I like. They play what you feed. All good recordings were awesome. Bad recordings are not made any better, it just plays them as they are. One thing I can say is, it is very coherent and musical. It does not try to be analytical or extremely detailed (even though it has perfect amount of details). I have about 30-40 hrs on these. Even from the first song, they were good.