New Omega E Mat from Perfect Path Technologies


Many of you own or have read of the highly-regarded PPT Omega E Mat, one of Tim Mrock’s revolutionary signal-enhancing accessories. Just prior to his untimely passing, Tim had finished developing a new generation of his Omega mat, soon to be available. Krissy Mrock has asked a few of us to introduce this new mat, here given the working title of The Double Omega.

In distinguishing the Double Omega, we know the original Omega, herein called the single, as a 7.5” by 10”, rather heavy and somewhat pliable mat, a bit more than 1/8” thick and with a vinyl-like feel. One face is glossy white, displaying the PPT logo and Omega name, while the other is black, smooth and magnetized. Sandwiched between these faces is the active material that causes components to reject the EMI that saturates everything in our surroundings. The Double Omega is much the same, with one important difference: the magnetized face has the finely-textured feel of around, say, 220-grit sandpaper. This texture, it is presumed, comprises yet a second active layer of EMI rejection. Presumed—because working details of the Double Omega are not well understood—better yet to know how to apply it.

With the understanding that the single Omega E mats generate field effects from both faces, mats have typically been placed under and over components and vertically over circuit breakers. How you apply the Double Omega will depend on best use and experimentation. In my case, I have removed two single mats, lying side-by-side, from the top of my large Wadia CDP and have replaced those with two Double Omegas. The Wadia is a one-box player that contains a pre-amp, so I wanted that second, strong field effect exerting downward as well as upward. I also have several singles placed underneath, just as before. Going straight to amps, this player is my only source, so I want it fully protected from EMI. Your priorities will differ.

As of this writing, I am only thirty-hours in on placing these Double Omegas, and I can already tell you they are powerful in their prevention of EMI within my digital source. Yet another veil has been lifted—all instruments and voices are even more sorted out in the aural space with new information heard within that space. There is much more decay heard against a new silence behind and between the musicians. I am already so pleased and excited about what the Double Omega E mats are doing. As Krissy told me, Tim was really stoked to have these new mats available. Rather than wait for the the fourteen-day window of improvement, I want to get this intro out so others can relay their experiences sooner.


128x128jafreeman
Post removed 
The contents of the mats are a dormant passive device until activated by an external energy field. The mats reactivity continues to enlarge in size and power while in the presence of this external field. The resulting field generated from this inneraction fills the space of the component. So there is no breakin of the device but there is an energy activation period that is mutual between the passive mat and the active device in a chassis.. When the mat is removed the positive benefits remain in the mechanical memory of the contents of the device. Over a period of time this positive memory is dissapated or replaced in short hand by another contrary field.I really believe there is reduction of interfering energy...like shear waves in all solid devices. We can hear and describe the reduction of a polarity of shear that reduces innerfering energy in a cello. Less force is required to generate greater sound..damn that hurt. Tom
Frank, Oregonpapa have you tried many tweaks that you weren’t happy with? Or felt just didn’t make a difference?
sincere question. 
uberwaltz,

Where did your post telling me my dealer gave me some bad stuff go?

Anyway, I have no dealer of any kind and, unlike what many here say about themselves, have never tried any drug. Just to keep that out of your humorous attempt.

I am puzzled by recent discovery. Look, all of the Mat supporters on this thread read it. I do not expect you (plural) to read all my posts but I suspect oregonpapa’s get read.

I am trying to find an excuse why, when oregonpapa stated the mat is not magnetic, none of you corrected him on that fairly basic statement. It would have been very fair and nothing spectacular.

I can come up with only three thoughts.

You noticed the error but decided that it is fine if oregonpapa embarasses himself down the line

You noticed the error but it was going your way, and against me, so you did not want to lose the point.

You did not notice the error despite having vast experience with this mat.

Do you have any other thought about that?
I am going to be blunt as a brick now and if it lasts as long as last post oh well I tried.

I have absolutely zero interest in entering into any discourse with members Glupson and Atdavid.

Both have proven to be extremely obtuse and incapable of logical postings.

Now have a great Thanksgiving gentlemen but I will tarry here no longer.