Kosst_Amojan: <<Your post is a text book example of the "leave people alone in their own opinions and never challenge them" thinking>>
Not sure how you inferred this from my post. I neither said nor think that. You simply seem much more heavy-handed than I in introducing people to higher-quality audio than they're aware of - thus my "proselytism" comment.
There are primarily two scenarios that might lead me to an introduction. 1: people visit and see my system, and I make a light-hearted apology for the elaborate equipment, explaining that high quality music playback is a lifelong hobby. If they respond positively or are inquisitive, then the discussion leads where it may.
2: At home, or out and about, if someone comments on good sound they're hearing, I will follow up to see what they're thinking and if they're receptive to pursuing it for themselves.
I do not feel any duty to "spread the gospel" by bringing the topic up every time I realize someone just wants to listen to songs and has no interest in more realistic reproduction.
Not sure how you inferred this from my post. I neither said nor think that. You simply seem much more heavy-handed than I in introducing people to higher-quality audio than they're aware of - thus my "proselytism" comment.
There are primarily two scenarios that might lead me to an introduction. 1: people visit and see my system, and I make a light-hearted apology for the elaborate equipment, explaining that high quality music playback is a lifelong hobby. If they respond positively or are inquisitive, then the discussion leads where it may.
2: At home, or out and about, if someone comments on good sound they're hearing, I will follow up to see what they're thinking and if they're receptive to pursuing it for themselves.
I do not feel any duty to "spread the gospel" by bringing the topic up every time I realize someone just wants to listen to songs and has no interest in more realistic reproduction.