I like my system flat, no tone controls, no eq..........what is your preference, and why.


A poster on another thread here has encouraged me to post this. Been an audio professional and a hobbyist for 50 tears. I had my time with eq, tone controls ( even reverb and time delay units ). I am currently at the point where I need nothing to alter the recordings I listen to, nor to compensate for room aberrations. I have spent lots of money on equipment , had equipment on loan, of all types ( pretty much a bit of everything, for the most part ) and I have tweaked, and tweaked, and tweaked. I have recently tooled down to a much simpler and less expensive system, and I find I am the happiest I have ever been. Might be my amp, my passive unit, my speakers...…….yes, all of that. Yes, all of that is important, but it is the system synergy that has made me realize that changing anything with an eq or tone controls took me further from that synergy, that balance. I accept, and enjoy my recordings for what they are. Some better than others ( sq ). But, I am enjoying the brilliance of all the studio work put into them,  exactly as they were intended to be listened to. This is me. I do not believe in right or wrong, better or worse, newer vs older, yada yada yada. I have believed, and have stated, particularly in this hobby, to each his own. I hear fuse differences, power cable differences, etc. Some believe I was born a bat. I am happy of my gift, not just hearing well, but through the years, teaching myself " what it is I like ", which is the key for most of us. I am not sure where this thread will go, but I put it out there, and hope folks will drop in, even though much of it might have been stated before in other threads. Thank you A'gon family, be well, and Enjoy ! MrD.
mrdecibel
With an Audio Research SP9 Mk III and Classic 60 driving Thiel CS 3.5's, I have no tone controls available, but why would anyone want them???? I also find that all car stereos I've encountered sound best "flat".....Call me crazy, but that's how I see it.
The concept of DEQX is to move the sound from the system in the room to close to flat. 
I think 2 channel purest believe using EQ or tone controls degrade the signal.  Using room treatments, proper speaker placement and fine tuning with cables is their cup of tea....To boost midrange or treble frequencies defusers are used.  To reduce energy, absorbers or traps are used.  After years of experimenting with both schools of thought I have concluded that whatever works best for you, your room and your music is the way to go.
In my listening room the floor is flat as are the walls and ceiling, although the latter does slope up fairly high in a flat way. And I can say I’m VERY judgmental about this stuff, as I’m a purist. I’ll say again that the Loki doesn’t degrade anything except my reputation as I previously stated prior to denying I own one, which I do...both things...deny and own...
Only tone control in my system is an analog PEQ in the sub that does not affect the mains. No tone control on the preamp.
My room is a sonic mess but it is treated with a collection of purchased and DIY treatments placed strategically using REW. Speaker placement and the sub were also dialed in using REW, including trying to line up the phase of the sub to the mains at the crossover frequency. It helps that the sub has a very flat phase response across frequencies.
As long as I play the hifi game, I wouldn’t have it any other way.