2. music
  3. 150643-365

Yet another Qobuz vs. Tidal debate

I'm not convinced that I'm getting "CD Quality" from either service even though I've paid a premium for it.  In terms of the catalog, Tidal has Qobuz beat hands down.  Not even close IMO.  I like the user interface a little more with Tidal.  Similar artists populate right under the album listings.  However, Tidal is expensive when compared to Qobuz, if you're a long term subscriber. With Qobuz I received a considerable discount with a 1 year subscription.  I was paying $24 month (with taxes inc) for Tidal and that was a year ago. It's probably gone up from that. $300 a year buys a lot of CD's (especially when I usually buy mine used).  Has anyone else been as disillusioned as I am?     
russellrcncom

Showing 1 response by cycles2

cycles2
194 posts
 
I've been a TIDAL subscriber for approx 3 years.  I signed up for a 30-day Qobuz trial. I was skeptical at first but am finding the Qobuz catalog comparable to TIDAL for my tastes mainly in rock/jazz.

There seems to be more hires albums in Qobuz compared to TIDAL MQA albums.  I'm trying to avoid the MQA debate so I won't comment on whether I feel Qobuz hires sounds better than TIDAL MQA..

I did discover that I can play Qobuz hi-rez titles in my car and the sound is amazing.  I assume playing TIDAL MQA titles in most car stereos plays MQA tracks at redbook CD 44.1KHz/16 bit resolution.

At the Qobuz intro price of $15/month compared to $20/month for TIDAL high fidelity, I'll probably make the switch. 


More to discover