@jlbkmb1958 - if recording was made and mastered digitally, there is no reason to convert it back to analog. The fewer conversions, the better.
Yes, it’s not necessary to spend big bucks to enjoy great sound with vinyl. However, it can get better with more expensive gear. My view is that vinyl can be better not necessarily because it’s analogue, but because it’s mastered better.
|
@inna - funny that you mentioned Nakamishi Dragon, I plan to get their 11.4.6 wireless surround system which got great reviews. Saves me from running wires all over the place. These ethernet experts are so tiring, thinking that their knowledge is equivalent to knowing everything about high-end audio streaming. Rarely bothering to do any additional research on why better components "sound" better. Thinking that bits are bits but ignoring there fact that the data rides on an analog signal that is subject to picking up noise that we can hear on "transparent" (beyond box store) high-end audio chains. Then there's digital audio jitter timing deviation that can cause distortion and noise in the sound. Seems most naysayers are "I'm right until you prove me wrong" aka too lazy from trying it out themselves or looking up the evidence on their own. Agree that can have good/great sound for less, but high performing turntable, tonearm, phonopre, and cartridge can quickly get expensive. Maybe someday I can afford to try out DS Audio cartridge systems and one piece diamond canteliver+stylus cartridge.
|
kennyc, besides being very useful to me, Nakamichi 682ZX tape deck that I have is a piece of audiophile history. It is also analog almost all in one component, you can listen to it with headphones. Its headphone amp is not great but not too bad. The very best Nakamichi deck is thought to be 1000zxl, though some prefer ZX-9. DS Audio cartridge system is very interesting, I read about it. |