wide baffles and baffle step
Lengthy quotation from Peter Comeau, designer at Wharfedale. Makes a lot of sense to me...
"Th[e] larger ported box, with its subsequent increased baffle size, helps solve a major problem in modern speakers, namely, the baffle step.
I grew up with large speakers with wide baffles, but, as speakers reduced in size over the years I noticed that something was missing from the sound and, when I stuck my head firmly into speaker design, I began to understand the acoustic problems caused by the baffle step.
Put simply, as the baffle size decreases, the point at which the acoustic radiation changes from hemispherical to spherical goes up in frequency. It also becomes sharper and narrower in bandwidth as the sides of the cabinet, and the walls and floor of the room, are further removed from the equation. So, this 6dB step in the power response becomes acoustically more obvious.
I believe that a thin speaker always sounds thinner throughout the midrange when directly compared to a speaker with more generous baffle width. Of course, as designers of modern, slim speakers, we compromise by adjusting for the baffle step in the crossover, but in doing so, we also compromise sensitivity. What starts out as a 90dB at 1W drive-unit often ends up as an 85dB system once we have adjusted for the power loss due to the baffle step."
Showing 6 responses by twoleftears
Thank you, Duke, @audiokinesis , for bringing your specialized and hands-on knowledge to this issue. What you refer to lower-end impact and articulation is something that I remember as experiencing first-hand when I auditioned the Spendor Classic 100 directly against the Spendor D7. From the 100 there seemed to be just more music coming at me, something that at the time I thought of as "wave launch". |
This is what I think is sad. https://www.bluebirdmusic.com/edit/files/images/gallery/spendor_str_nov_18.jpg |