Atmasphere,
You may be thinking too far ahead, but it's the only way to get ahead:-)
Duplication of music is what TTP has done. The sonics are great but they can only continue to supply master tapes if they show a profit. They sourced available and affordable master tapes they thought would draw a wide range of audiophiles to RTR sound. As is the case with all start up companies it takes an investment of money, knowledge and time to get things off the ground. They need more subscribers to increase their sales, fund masters that will attract new subscribers and satisfy those that bought into the concept before they heard the first tape. The cost of their undertaking is beyond the scope of the average audiophile.
What I'm going to say should not be construed as pompous so please don't take it that way.
A year and a half ago, after I drove to ATR Services to pick up my ATR 102, I had a conversation with Mike Spitz regarding a possible resurgence of RTR tapes. I wondered if it would be possible to reissue tapes that passed the 50 year copyright statue;. I was told that he had a inquiry from a party that had an interest in doing just that. The price of four ATR machines along with the acoutrements needed to do the job was not in the business plan. That plan was to duplicate 7 1/2 ips tapes to those that wanted them.----------
The market wasn't there then and would be now??????
If they're are those out there that have 15 or 30 ips tapes that would be willing to allow duplication for others with NO PROFIT MOTIVE it might fly. However, I'm not an attorney, so I can't make the call.
To sum it up, I'm spending my kids inheritance on music, and have multiple ATR machines that are drooling at the opportunity to spread master tapes to those that realize that in the golden era of music, everything was on tape.
Why do I think I'll get a reply from a lawyer? I have one in mind with whom I've spoken before; and an Audiogonner--what could be better?
Your thoughts, Ken
