Why is most everything remastered?


It's becoming more and more difficult to find what sound signature was originally meant by the artist. I have examples that sound terrible after remastering. I understand why it has to be this way, If and only it improves the original, if not... leave it alone!

voodoolounge

Showing 1 response by erik_squires

I have lots of examples of music mastered for boom boxes, and I so wish we had the ability to reach back in time and shake those mastering engineers a little bit. :D

A remaster at least gives us the chance that more modern equipment was envisioned by the mastering engineer.

Honestly it can go either way, but would rather have options though I find most re-masters just boring and not significantly better.

The MoFI remaster of Pink Floyd DSotM though, awful. Eliminated a bunch of effects in the original