2. misc-audio
  3. 181571-179096

Why is everyone so down on MQA?

Ok. MQA is a little bit complicated to understand without doing a little research. First of all: MQA is not technically a lossy format. The way it works is very unique. The original master tape (Holy grail of SQ) is folded or compressed into a smaller format. It is later unfolded through a process I don’t claim to understand. The fully processed final version is lossless! It is the song version from the original master tape. FYI, original master tapes are usually the best sounding, they are also the truest version of any song- they are painstakingly produced along with the artist in the studio during the recording process. Ask anyone, they are the real deal. For some reason most people hate the sound quality! One caveat, the folding/unfolding process is usually carried out at one time by a dac. But some dacs only compress and do not unfold….I think Meridian should explain dac/ streamer compatibility issue. When your hardware supports the single step the sound quality is pretty amazing. They should have explained in more detail what the format is all about.

walkenfan2013

Showing 5 responses by erik_squires

erik_squires
16,653 posts
 

Speaking of a solution in search of a problem, one oddball thing that has gotten much better over the past 15 years is Redbook playback.  The truly great DACs have narrowed the field a great deal between Redbook and 96/24 or better.   If yo have a DAC that only plays hi rez well switch.

This also means, again, MQA isn't that great if your DAC is already really good at low res.

erik_squires
16,653 posts
 

@plaw

I like how you think.  MQA's motto should be "At least we don't suck!"

erik_squires
16,653 posts
 

I think the premis of the OP is a little much.

 

It isn't like I hate MQA.  It is more like I prefer not to use it.

erik_squires
16,653 posts
 

+1 edcyn

erik_squires
16,653 posts
 

I have a Mytek Brooklyn which is fully MQA capable but after a lot of listening, and talking to members of the San Francisco audiophile society I have left it off.

There are three problems for me:

  1. Lossy
  2. Tries fixing a problem we no longer have
  3. Not that great sounding

The lossy/lossless part of MQA is to me the least interesting, but please see the great write-up from Benchmark (below) on this point.  Apparently it is quite lossy.

The bigger issue in my mind is that it's attempting to solve problems from the 1990s.  High resolution music transmission.  That problem was solved by cheap Internet and high speed Ethernet.  I don't need more compression.

Lastly, it just doesn't sound that good.  The biggest audio related issue I can detect is the use of an apodizing digital filter, which is not perfect but attempts to solve pre-ringing artifacts.  To my ears it also severely softens the music sound and I prefer steep roll-off filters.

 

 

 

More to discover