Why is 2 Channel better than multi-channel?


I hear that the music fidelity of a multi-channel AV Receiver/Integrated amp can never match the sounds produced by a 2 channel system. Can someone clearly explain why this is so?

I'm planning to upgrade my HT system to try and achieve the best of both worlds, I currently have a 3 channel amp driving my SL, SR, C and a 2 channel amp driving my L and R.
I have a Denon 3801 acting as my pre. Is there any Pre/Proc out there that can merge both worlds with out breaking my bank? Looking for recommendations on what my next logical steps should be? Thanks in advance.
springowl
It is the way we hear. Two channel make one sound with three dimension. I looked into SACD two channel was best; when more came out as multichannel, and I have found the best in NOT movie set-up, but two further out and wider ambient speakers.

You do not have part of orchestra playing in balcony, no. It is not like a movie where the car come from behind you.\

I very much like SACD, but stereo SACD is best.
What you have now is pretty good. I have near the same in my bedroom; Denon 4802 with three channel power amp. front and surround from the Denon, and centre and two back on amp, which are 4 ohms, and amp does well with load.

Run the 7.1 analogue exit in and you have the new format.

Once you go for a higher-end, the cost goes up by a large margin.
Music only considered, I think most of this has to do with the overall quality of the recordings, 2 ch vs multi. I think it's clear that there's vastly more high quality 2 channel -analog and digital - content and, thus, purity of signal would likely flow through quality 2 channel dedicated setup, sans some multi-channel post processing of the signal..all things equal. If the a hugh percentage of musical source content was simply superb hi-rez, well recorded content on multi channel, as status quo, then I think things would be different. So quality over quantity as a priority, every time, IMO!
Then, whether either scenario is or isn't ever the case, one still needs a high quality setup for all the loudspeakers and corresponding seating and acoustics in same space to take advantage and maximize the sound quality from the setup and speakers! - this is NOT typically the case, I find, from most multi ch setup's, let alone those who don't know how to maximize the sound quality from a basic 2 ch setup! It's just harder to do right, fundamentally.
So, 2 ch is easier to setup and get good sound by default, and better source material in 2 channel mix, equals advantage to 2 ch !
...I still prefer dedicated multi mix for movies, however,..digitally processed in an AV pre/pro out to quality amps and setup, is hard to beat for that medium.
OK, EVERYBODY, IT'S OFFICIAL! Kr4 HAS SHUT THE TREAD DOWN! R.I.P 2 ch v multi thread!!! It's been real...

...we can all go home now and start on the next Oppo thread, or mull over subwoofer placement, which preamp sounds better with what rare tube, or try in vain to research which non-matching other branded center speaker ill-advisedly go with our Class B Stereophile rated dedicated music only loudspeakers!
Mission accomplished soldiers!
Let's just all move on then.

....ok aaaand we're done!
OK, EVERYBODY, IT'S OFFICIAL! ..Kr4 HAS SHUT THE TREAD DOWN!
...we can all go home now and start on the next Oppo thread, or mull over subwoofer placement, which preamp sounds better with what rare tube, or try in vain to research which non-matching other branded center speaker ill-advisedly go with our Class B Stereophile rated dedicated music only loudspeakers!
Mission accomplished soldiers!
Let's just all move on then.

....ok aaaand we're done!