Why high-end cable manufacturers don't post measurements?

Yes, this is primed for cable naysayers.

Why?

Because there aren't any measurable differences between any reasonably designed cables.

Nor any sonic differences that can be readily identified blind.

Even the most expensive stuff from Cardas, Nordost, Kimber etc defy identification against the cheapest unbranded OFC copper design.

You can bet the above mentioned companies would publish their findings if they had any.

Alas there’s more chance of the British royal family publishing the results of Prince Harry’s DNA test.

@ieales,

'So what is your mission or drive?

Protect the uneducated from charlatans.'


A good and principled answer.

I'd even argue that calling them charlatans is giving them a large benefit of the doubt.

Many reviewers, magazines and parts of the industry have formed a mutually beneficial society with the snake oil cabal.

In fact the shameless scoundrels seem to be 'as thick as thieves' on this important issue.

So it's essential that there are people who are willing to present the truth.

There is not a single shred of evidence, other than the plethora of the merely anecdotal, that there is anything whatsoever to be gained from going above and beyond basic ofc cable.

Or even a soldered iron  coat hanger!

I was going to suggest someone should repeat the old coat hanger v monster cable death match battle. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gizmodo.com/audiophile-deathmatch-monster-cables-vs-a-coat-hanger-36315...

But lo and behold, guess what?
Someone already has.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.soundguys.com/cable-myths-reviving-the-coathanger-test-23553/amp/