2. digital
  3. 190798-789

Why a dedicated SACD player more noticeable sound quality difference than HDMI-I2S w/ DACs

Over the weekend, we brought together our gears and run experiment with HDMI-I2S on a few external DACs to hear the comparison among:

  1. Oppo 105 SACD Player XLR output
  2. Oppo 105 HDMI-I2S to S.M.S.L. D400EX - XLR Output
  3. Oppo 105 HDMI-I2S to Denafrips Venus II 12th - XLR Output
  4. Oppo 105 HDMI-I2S to PS Audio DirectStream DAC Mk1 - Output
  5. Technics SL-G700 SACD Player XLR output

Pre-Amp: Denafrips Athena
Amplifier: Two Mark Levinson 333 Bi-Amp
Speakers: A Pair of B&W N801
Room: Acoustically treated
Playback is level match with pink noise track so both SACD Disc and DSF file playback are the same volume SPL.
We took note so the pre-amp volume setting are different for each playback

Observations:
Slight sound characteristic differences among 2/3/4 (HDMI output)
1) the sound is distinctly different
5) the sound is distinctly different

Why we notice more audible difference between 1) and 5) , and very slight among 2/3/4?
Does the un-clocked HDMI-I2S interface introduce more jitter such that a dedicated SACD player will have better jitter control on its clocked SACD disc read signal?

asin
buellrider97
387 posts
 

I have an Oppo 105 not currently in use. If I’m not mistaken the fidelity is reduced using hdmi due to licensing. Does that come into play for your experiment? There’s a product to solve that , I believe it’s called The Break Out Box. Cheers , Mike. 

stereo5's avatar
stereo5
6,385 posts
 

You used a cheap Oppo which is inferior to the much better SACD players out there.  Not a great comparison.  

asin OP
33 posts
 

Agree Oppo 105 is not the best SACD Player.

My observation is about the lack of sonic differences in External DAC vs a new dedicated player, so was curious why?

ghdprentice
6,965 posts
 

While I love science and comparisons… but, you guys have way too many variables and are comparing consumer grade front ends on DACs in different leagues. 
 

One thing… like connection type and the input mechanisms should be closer in resolution and quality to the amp / speakers. 

audioman58's avatar
audioman58
4,134 posts
 

I Donot agree with that.

if you properly remove weak links in your digital chain ,and provide Quality 

Digital is best in many areas. In our large  audio group I have see. Most everything 

out there.  From you router that cheap noisy wall wart ,get rid of ,replace with much lower noise LPS ,linear tube audio makes a great one 

quality Ethernet hub at minimum $600 LHY  SW8: if you can afford better $3k substantial improvement Danish Audio group, or Innuos, quality Ethernet cables 

put best one at end point ,and a quality streamer with a LPS ,Dac needs to be at minimum $2k on up . Then you will hear a substantial Digital experience quality power cords also a must .

More to discover