Whole House Mains Wiring -- Ping: Jea48 (Jim) -- & ALL Others for your HELP!


I had the following PM discussion with member Almarg.  As you can see he -- as always -- was quite helpful!  However, upon my suggestion to post our conversation for others to see and perhaps learn, Al readily concurred, but suggested for the questions that he couldn't address, he referred me to Jim [Jea48].

It should be noted that I drug my Atma-Sphere amp manufacture, Ralph Karsten into this conversation via email.  As generous and helpful as he always is, he too helped a bunch.  I haven't copied his single email because the below is complex enough, without adding more.

My hope is that where my assumptions are questionable or for my questions, others will respond.  

Our new house's rafters are about 50% installed, so the other trades will be in soon.  And I will have to soon inform our electrician of our needs.  But I don't want to request something that isn't needed.  More IMPORTANTLY, I don't want to MISS something that is NEEDED!  So your help in checking this thread is greatly appreciated! 

NOTE:  I've listed our conversation as Audiogon would -- the most recent post last.  So, the real important part for me, is getting answers to the set of questions I asked towards the bottom -- Today at 20:28!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mrmb (you)

January 27, 2018 23:49

Thanks Al! That's what I was seeking.

Speaking of electrical noise/hum, I just found a Martin Logan article speaking about pre-wiring https://www.martinlogan.com/learn/faq-prewiring-a-home-theater.php.).

It addresses one of my other concerns about inserting multiple dedicated circuits in one room. They advise to connect all outlets/circuits with the same ground wire. I've previously read that ALL audio components should be connected together -- i.e., on the same dedicated circuit. If one didn't tie 2-dedicated circuits together by using the same ground, I can see why I've seen that advice.

Have a great remainder of the weekend AL. And thanks for sharing your expertise on Audiogon and in this PM. It's appreciated!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

almarg

January 28, 2018 13:37

Hi Mike,

 Thanks for sending the link to the article, which I hadn't seen before. A couple of comments on it:

 1)As you appear to realize, the benefit of the single ground wire approach they advise is that it would minimize or eliminate any differences of potential (i.e., voltage) between the safety ground connections of the outlets for the various dedicated lines, and hence any differences in potential between the chassis of components that are interconnected in the same system but are powered by separate dedicated lines. Which in turn will avoid ground loop issues that might otherwise occur.

 2)If the electrician indicates that such an approach would be problematical, due to either practical considerations or code compliance issues, using 3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground) for each of the dedicated lines should come close to accomplishing the same thing. And could very conceivably provide results that are just as good.

 In 3-conductor Romex the safety ground wire is symmetrically placed between the hot and neutral conductors. Therefore voltages that may be induced into the safety ground conductor by the magnetic fields surrounding each of the two current carrying conductors [current flow in a conductor produces a magnetic field around that conductor] will tend to cancel, since the fields produced by the two current carrying conductors are in opposite directions.

For further explanation see pages 31 to 35 of the following paper, which was written by a renowned authority on such matters:

https://centralindianaaes.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/indy-aes-2012-seminar-w-notes-v1-0.pdf

Best regards,

-- Al

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mrmb (you)

January 28, 2018 20:28

Hello Al,

RUN LENGTHS/BALANCING:

I did recently find elsewhere as you suggested, that using 12/3 was a prudent approach, but thanks for seconding that approach.

We talked about Martin Logan’s single ground wire recommendation. And you mentioned that using 12/3 (verses 12/2) may well compensate, if code prevents the implementation of ML’s plan. I suppose if code allows the M/L single ground wire approach and then 12/3 is also used, that would be icing on the cake!

Because it’s a breeze to do while the walls are open, I believe I will put 2-20amp outlets in the most important room – the 2-channel one (just in case)! Residing therein will be: 1) Atma-Sphere MA-1 monoblocks; a Lampizator Golden Gate DAC and 2-Soundlab M1PX stats.

For now let’s ignore the Soundlabs, which will be about 7 feet from the rack and that wall’s outlets, and thus, probably on their own 15amp circuit. Would you recommend that the Atma-Sphere amps be plugged into 1 of the dedicated 20-amp outlets and the Lampizator plugged into the 2nd. 20-amp circuit? Or would it be better to plug all 3-pieces into the same 20-amp circuit (plugging the Lampizator into an additional receptacle on the same circuit)?

Ancillary to the question of what component(s) should be plugged in where: Would there be any sonic downside to installing a Wall-Switch for the 2-Soundlab’s dedicated line (and its ganged outlet on the opposite side of the room)?

That is, would a Wall Switch be some sort of sonic negative; because it was a part of that circuit (sonically deducting a positive, or adding a negative)? And referencing the Martin Logan’s single ground wire plan: I’m unsure if we tied 3-dedicated circuits together (both 20-amp ones and the 15-amp Soundlab one) with a single ground, if a Switch would prevent that process from being implemented? Or would a Switch somehow negatively affect the “single ground logic”, or simple be too cumbersome to install?

Lastly, if code will allow M/L’s method of using a single ground on all dedicated circuits for my room, it may be difficult to implement because of the distance the Soundlab's (7-Feet) are from the front wall outlets. Especially when considering that the Soundlab’s outlets will be 19-Feet from each other – on opposite sides of the room.

My concern may be unfounded, because being the neophyte that I am; I can’t envision how to implement a single wire ground for 3-dedicated outlets as far apart as mine will be. And overall, I wonder if would be good enough (in audiophile terms) to simply install 3-dedicated circuits and not be concerned with using the same ground for each? However this may be confounded by the fact that folks have suggested that if multiple dedicated circuits are used, one should make the wire length for each one as close to the same as possible. Without rolling-up and storing several feet of cable (in the walls or at the panel) for the circuits longer that the other’s, this would be all but impossible.

I apologize for my hyper-granularity or should I say my “analness” regarding this wiring issue, but that’s sort of the definition of we audiophiles isn’t it? At any rate, I appreciate your assistance in a topic that I’m flying blind on! After we’re all said and done here, for others to gain from your teaching, I would like to post our communications on Audiogon as long as you’re amenable to same. That’s the beauty of forums, many sharing/learning from ONE!!! But I digress…..

WIRE:

The plan is to specify Southwire’s Romex ® brand of Solid Core (vs stranded) wire – is Southwire Solid Core also your recommendation? But I’m confused about the type of Romex ® to use. I’ve seen various ones: with “XHHW” recommended over “THHN”, but also “NM” recommended. What say you?

WIRE GAUGE, MULTIPLE OUTLETS:

Additionally, I've found a piece posted by MSB to be informational. As you can see (http://www.msbtechnology.com/faq/how-to-wire-your-house-for-good-power/) their thesis is that gauge size is of utmost importance! I’ve found some disagreement relative to whether 8 gauge wire can be installed in an outlet or not -- your opinion? At any rate, can an electrician pull 8 gauge to the audio room and terminate it in some sort of junction box and go from there to my audiophile grade outlets? And then, is there any downside to ganging several outlets from one dedicated circuit? In my home theater area, rather than multiple wall outlets, I’ve found it more advantageous to use a power center such as the Furman Elite-20 PF I’m presently using. It has a video and a sonic benefit, plus I find DC Triggers to be useful. So, unless you believe ganged outlets are better than a Furman (et al), I won’t have the electrician install anymore outlets than I think will be needed when using a Power Center.

PANEL-TO-PANEL WIRE GAUGE AND CONNECTION METHODOLGY:

Should I recommend a specific wire gauge or type for the electrician to use BETWEEN the main 200-amp panels and the sub-panel? Should I ask the electrician to use a specific method to use to tie these panels together? One forum poster advised: “running one large wire from the very top position in the load center on the leg with the least number of noise-generating devices to a sub-panel”. Would this be your method?

BREAKERS:

I also found the following discussion from PS Audio (http://www.psaudio.com/ps_how/how-to-install-a-dedicated-ac-line/). It advised that 20-amp breakers should be used “for even the lowest draw source equipment feed”. I took that to mean that although the circuit may be less than 20-amps, that a 20-amp breaker should be used. Is that what you would suggest?

LOAD CENTERS:

So, my present plan for the 2-channel room (mentioned previously) is to install 2-200 amp panels and a 60-100 amp subpanel for the 3-A/V areas (to get it as close as possible to 2-channel audio room – is this your preference?

Speaking of load centers, I’ve found several positive mentions of Schneider’s Model: “Square D QO” Panels (the “QO” Model with copper plated busing). Does QO Square D model work for you?

GROUND ROD:

I’ve read rather lengthy dissertations on this subject. Not being interested in getting into the weeds here, is there a material, length and methodology you would suggest using here?

SERVICE:

And lastly, should I even be concerned about the wire/cable used for the service drop or service entrance? NOTE: Service will be buried.

IT’S ABOUT TIME….THE CONCLUSION:

Whew, I can’t tell you how much I appreciate you wading through all and helping with all of this!! It’s all but impossible to find folks educated in this subject such as Electrical Engineers and Electricians who care about the details we audiophiles do! So, I consider you a wealth of information on the subject form your previous responses to my questions but more importantly, from the number of posts and volume of information that you’ve posted on Audiogon and I’m sure elsewhere!!!

Be well and take care,

-Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
almarg

January 28, 2018 22:06

Hi Mike,

Thank you again for the nice words.

I should have been more explicit when I referred in the previous communication to "3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground)," and subsequently to "3-conductor Romex." My reference to three conductors included the ground conductor, so I was referring to "12-2 with ground" and not to 12-3. The additional "hot" conductor in 12-3 would serve no purpose in this situation, and if that conductor were used to carry a current the benefit of the symmetry I referred to between the current conductors and the ground wire in 12-2 would likely be negated.

My suggestion of 12-2 Romex as a potentially suitable alternative to ML's suggested configuration was in contrast, for example, to using conductors within metal conduit, which as explained in the reference I cited would be much more conducive to ground loop issues. Especially when multiple dedicated lines are used to power the components in a single system.

Regarding your first question, my guess is that it would be best to put the amps and the DAC on separate circuits. I say that in part because various comments I've seen Ralph provide over the years lead me to believe that his designs are less susceptible to ground loop issues than most, and consequently there is unlikely to be any downside from keeping the amps and the DAC with its potentially noisy digital circuitry on separate dedicated lines.

Regarding a wall switch for the power to the speakers, I don't see that as being a negative in itself. However as you alluded to the considerable distance between the various outlets does sound like implementing the ML approach would be cumbersome at best. And perhaps more significantly the considerable length of the ground connection between some of the outlets may negate a lot of the benefit of that approach. So perhaps just using "12-2 with ground" Romex in the normal manner, for each of the dedicated lines, would be simpler, more practical, and provide results which are just as good.

Regarding the suggestion of keeping the lengths of all of the dedicated lines the same, which I too have seen stated a number of times and which the ML writeup implied is desirable, FWIW I am not a believer in that. In nearly all applications the different lines would be carrying very different amounts of current, and correspondingly their conductors would be surrounded by magnetic fields having very different strengths, resulting in very different amounts of current being induced in the ground wire. Not to mention that voltage drops in the hot and neutral conductors would be very different. So I don't see why keeping all the lengths the same would provide any benefit.

Regarding posting our communications in the forums, that would be fine with me. If you were to do so, or at least start a thread with some of your questions, chances are it would catch the eye of Jea48 (Jim), who is by far the leading expert at Audiogon on electrician-type (as opposed to EE) matters.

And for that matter, Jim would be the best person to address your questions about NM-B vs. XHHW vs. THHN, use of 8 gauge wire (which I suspect would be extremely difficult to work with, as well as probably being overkill), and most or all of your subsequent questions.

Regarding the question about PS Audio's statement that "we recommend you use a 20 amp breaker for even the lowest draw source equipment feed," though, I can say with certainty that it would be both unsafe and a code violation to use a 20 amp breaker on a circuit which "may be less than 20-amps." In other words, if a 20 amp breaker is used the outlet must be a 20 amp type and the wiring must be 12 gauge or heavier. What they no doubt meant, as you probably realize, is that even if the equipment powered via that line only draws a small fraction of 15 amps, they would still recommend a breaker, outlet, and wiring rated for 20 amps. Which would have no downside, and I suppose might provide at least a small benefit in some circumstances.

Best regards,

-- Al



128x128mrmb
@almarg,

Al, thank you for the kind words.

+1 on the information you gave mrmb. I would add 2 wire + ground MC (Metal Clad) aluminum armor cable has a lower "Ground Voltage Induction (GVI)" than 2 wire + ground NM-B sheathed cable does. (Romex  is a Trade Name of NM-B)

 Solid copper 10/2 with ground MC aluminum armor cable.
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Southwire-10-2-x-125-ft-Solid-CU-MC-Metal-Clad-Armorlite-Cable-69117005/...

Jim 
From an AudioCircle Thread: "I was given this advice from the design engineer of a well known Audiophile Power Conditioner manufacturer."
"Use round Romex 10/3 or 12/3. Inside are 4 wires, a black, white, red and bare wire(s). Use black for hot, white for neutral, the red and the bare are both for ground (using 2 wires for ground gives you a much lower impedance path to earth ground resulting in a quieter system with a lower noise floor). If you do 2 dedicated circuits, make the wire length identical for both if at all possible."

And another A/Circle post: "The 10/3 (plus ground) Romex® NMB is typically used for split phase 240V circuits. But the 3 conductor (+G) has a virtue when used in 120V circuits (one wire is not connected) that virtue is that it has a natural twist which reduces interference."




Al, I found the above. So, when you mentioned 12/3, it correlated with what others had said. So, perhaps 12/3 if installed, does have some benefit?
Hi Mike,

Twisted construction, as is apparently provided in the round Romex referred to in the AudioCircle posts you quoted, will reduce susceptibility to pickup of interference (RFI/EMI). However in a situation where interconnected components in a system are powered from different dedicated lines that potential benefit is, IMO, more likely than not to be outweighed by the importance of minimizing susceptibility to ground loop effects (which besides resulting in hum in some cases can result in high frequency buzz, reduction of "background blackness," and other such high frequency effects). And given what is said in the section of Mr. Whitlock’s paper that I cited, the symmetrical placement of the current carrying conductors in 12-2 + Ground flat Romex relative to the safety ground conductor will serve that goal better than the asymmetrical configuration that would result from paralleling the red wire with the ground wire, as suggested in the first of the AudioCircle posts that you quoted. And I suspect also better than the configuration suggested in the second post, given the unconnected wire in the cable and the unknown configuration and uniformity of the twist.

Best regards,
-- Al

Consider a sub-panel, which will make any future changes and expansions a lot easier. Whether lighting, projection, who knows. Having a sub-panel makes changes easier.

Also, I do not like to rely on WiFi for streaming. Mainly due to reliability issues, either from the crappy routers themselves to channel congestion and who knows what else. So make sure you have Ethernet run at the same time.
The sub-panel was estimated in the electrician's quote, so I plan to solely keep my A/V (2-channel room and (2) 7.2 rooms) and nothing else! 

I don't know yet where the load panels will be, but my goal is to have the sub-panel placed as close as I can get it, to the most important room -- the Soundlab 2-channel one (which, it appears shorter runs from the panel to the room are very good things)!

Yep, Low Voltage CAT and COAX are another can that I opened and thankfully for it, I believe I have if figured out. 

Cable runs:  CAT 6 = 35; RG6 = 17, Conduit = 6 will pull strings for  anyplace that I may need to pull more low voltage cables); In-Room Speaker = 9; In-Room HDM1 = 9 and at least 1 Fiber from outside junction box to structured wiring cabinet. 

NOTE:  One of the low voltage quotes suggested putting the conduit in the attic:  The estimator's logic (based on experience; I would never have thought of it) follows: 
"For all the conduit runs that are in each location, my thought would be to cap them in the attic instead of running them all the way back to where the rack would be located."  "You'll have a conduit run (likely 2) going from the rack to the attic so it will be easy to feed all the way from location to demarcation."  "Running a conduit that whole way may provide hang-ups at some point so if we keep the conduit runs around 20' and as vertical as possible, that makes it that much easier."

Speaking of the attic, we're placing an over-the-air TV antenna there, in order to cut the darn cable.  It's about time!  Netflix, Prime, and streaming services like Hulu, and Direct TV NOW are allowing all to only pay for what they watch (rather than 10,000 channels of "krap") and it's streaming rather than time based.  What's not too like!! 

Walls are open, WiFi is fine, but is not as robust as wired, so why not string cable everywhere?

CAT and A/C for potential POI security cameras.  Presently, CAT is our friend from a hardwire perspective.

BTW, I plan on using ROON to stream to several of those CAT 6 locations, plus A/C for self powered speakers.





Re. Almarg:  I should have been more explicit when I referred in the previous communication to "3-conductor Romex (e.g., 12-2 with ground)," and subsequently to "3-conductor Romex." My reference to three conductors included the ground conductor, so I was referring to "12-2 with ground" and not to 12-3. The additional "hot" conductor in 12-3 would serve no purpose in this situation, and if that conductor were used to carry a current the benefit of the symmetry I referred to between the current conductors and the ground wire in 12-2 would likely be negated.
 From an AudioCircle Thread:  "I was given this advice from the design engineer of a well known Audiophile Power Conditioner manufacturer."
"Use round Romex 10/3 or 12/3. Inside are 4 wires, a black, white, red and bare wire(s). Use black for hot, white for neutral, the red and the bare are both for ground (using 2 wires for ground gives you a much lower impedance path to earth ground resulting in a quieter system with a lower noise floor). If you do 2 dedicated circuits, make the wire length identical for both if at all possible."

And another A/Circle post:  "The 10/3 (plus ground) Romex® NMB is typically used for split phase 240V circuits. But the 3 conductor (+G) has a virtue when used in 120V circuits (one wire is not connected) that virtue is that it has a natural twist which reduces interference."



Al, I found the above.  So, when you mentioned 12/3, it correlated with what others had said.  So, perhaps 12/3 if installed, does have some benefit? 

But if  I would like to hear that others agree it does have benefit and if so, how should 12/3 or 10/3 it be installed?
Flexibility and Ethernet.

Consider a sub-panel, which will make any future changes and expansions a lot easier.  Whether lighting, projection, who knows. Having a sub-panel makes changes easier.

Also, I do not like to rely on WiFi for streaming. Mainly due to reliability issues, either from the crappy routers themselves to channel congestion and who knows what else. So make sure you have Ethernet run at the same time.

Best,

E