Regards, Griffiths: It's said "There's no fuel like an old fuel" (did I get that right?), so here's some "old fuel" to throw on the fire.
From "OldADC", Prichard's successor (1978) as cartridge designer: "Those other (cantilever designs) required a tie wire to assemble the stylus assemblies. A small wire was soldered in the back of the stylus tube and pulled toward the rear of the cartridge to a specific load and then soldered off to hold the assembly together. The load plane and the tension defined that center point of rotation for the assembly. All well and good until you consider a couple of factors. 1) That assembly is now by definition imbalanced in motional impedance fore and aft of the pressure defined pivot point. Constrained, held hostage, on a freaking leash! 2) That tie wire has a resonance of its very own. Almost all of them, based on length and diameter of the wire ended up somewhere around 17kHz. Many designs went to great lenght to dampen and tame that resonance but....and here is the big deal....even if you tame the amplitude resonance so flat you can't see it in a swept sine wave plot....you haven't done a dang thing for the 180 phase shift that must occur when that wire passes through its resonance, damped or not. I swear I could always hear a tie wire in the desperate confusion of attack on top hat symbols.
The Omnipivot design was very carefully calculated so that the balance of masses fore and aft of the designed point of rotation meant that the point of rotation as defined by the assembly is the same point as the point of percussion (ie that point of rotation were the assembly to be in free space). Thus the assembly wanted to rotate about the same point that we were asking it to. And when you got them wrong in assembly, you could tell. The Astrion was hand built and tweaked for this very reason. Every stylus assembly was truly balanced point of rotation to point of percussion and had not tie wire therefore no phase shift through resonance."
Other interesting observations concerning assemblies without tie wires identified a "pistoning" of the canitlever. This specific circumstance illustrates the need to match TA/cart compliances, the consequences of which were sometimes so severe as to result in the plucking of the cantilever assembly from the grip. ADC's low compliance suspensions when mounted to a "bulldozer" tonearm sometimes had this outcome, this phenomena was observed with the (MK 1) XLM. Prichard denied it's occurance.
Vibrations in a beam are influenced when constrained, a concern in industries ranging from architectural engineering "Galloping Gertie, the Tacoma Narrows Bridge) to fiber optics. In analog audio, the addition of a tie wire (see OldADC's comments above) illustrates this phenomena.
Just some fun info.
Peace, |
There are a few things I should add. 1) My previous post should have read 'loading is', not loading isn't. (a typo) 2) Nandric's cantilever is a Beryllium with a Shibata tip. Mine also has the Shibata tip but it being a Jico provided item, I am not sure of the material used for the cantilever. But I am sure it is not the coveted Beryllium. What convinced me to buy this Jico replacement was the fact that it has the 'tension wire' like the original stylus design. This lack of a 'tension wire' is the reason why there are no decent aftermarket stylus replacements for the Stantons and Pickerings. Morita-san, the designer of the SAS for Jico has developed the SAS stylus with this 'tension wire' design and must have decided to incorporate it into some of Jico's other stylus's. The JVC that Nikolas (Nantric), has was found and purchased on the Japanese auction site. I had the pleasure of having it pass through my home while on its travels to his home in The Netherlands. It is 100% NOS. In the short listen I had with his, I can honestly say that I could not tell any difference between his, and the JVC with the Jico MK II stylus. I state this only in praise of the Jico JVC X1 MKII stylus and I must clarify that there was no direct A/B testing done. But the amazing dynamics and clarity that I heard on the original (Nandric's), is also present on the Jico version. J/Carr has commented earlier on this forum about the importance of this 'tension wire'. It is why Nikolas and I started our search for cartridges that incorporate this design concept. It appears the Morita-san of Jico, who also had a hand in the design of the highly sought after Sony XL line of cartridges (the XL 45, 55. and the 88's), also feels that this 'tension wire' design must have much merit. I know that David (Dialoum), has been looking for an original X1 stylus for a long time. If I were David, I would not waste another minute before I placed an order of this Jico replacement. Its # is the DT-X1MK2 Regards, |
Hello Fleib.
One of the phono stages that I have in use is a heavily modded Jasmine. One of the mods converted it to 100K. I wondered if the reason it (the JVC X1) sounded so good was because of it being a 100K load! But Nandric was running his at 47K and feels the same about the JVC as I do so I do not feel the loading isn't an issue. Now perhaps mine does sound 'better' loaded at 100K than my Comrades loaded at 47K. (grin) I've not heard it at 47K to say for sure! I have the amp in the other system (the 47K phono stage system), out for repair. When it returns, I will check the JVC in it to confirm. Regards, |
A fitting end to the MM/MI thread? Nandric and Griffithds declare a winner with a "sweet little cart" rescued from obscurity. Who's to offer another opinion with only a few examples in the known world? Known to us, that is.
Raul has this cart, yet never declared it the best? Just got a mention? Maybe it isn't so great at 100K, but it looks like a 4-ch cart.
What do we make of this, a conspiracy of two who prefer MCs (at least Nandric), to have their way with the defenseless MM damsels? Is this sweet little cart a pawn in a power struggle for MC superiority?
Since Raul isn't here I want to tell you, it's plagued with distortions. These are insidious anomalies designed to mask reality and lull you into sweet stupor. This is a warning. Don't listen to the JVC Sirens. Cover your ears like brave Ulysses or you'll be lulled to your demise. You'll be doing crazy things and sabotaging your set-up. Nandric wisely bent the beryllium cantilever and broke out of his stupor, but the call of the Siren was too much to resist.
Regards, |
I have a little confession. I had been needing a longer phono cable for weeks, and have not decided on what to buy, but in the meantime I was listening to digital through a Yamamota Dac and a PS Audio Transport. I thought I had finally found a digital source that could replace my turntable. Today, I just decided to set the turntable up, on the floor, next to the preamp.
Analogue still kills digital at my house. |
Agree with everyone on the Victor x-1. A sweet little cart. Thanks as always, for the heads up on the replacement styli. |
Fleib,
Forgot to mention. DC resistance: X1 470 Z1 510 And both Shibata's
Regards, |
Hi Fleib,
I remember that SAS MM1. It sold out rather quickly. I have that very same stylus mounted in a Garrott Bros. P77 cartridge. No, not a transplant but a perfect fit! If what you speculate to as the JVC Z also being the SAS MM1 then I am going to be quite a happy camper. Perhaps I should try to fit the SAS stylus I have for that P77 into the JVC Z. Housings do look different though! BTW: The JVC ad copy states the Z1 goes out to 50K. The X1 goes out to 60K. Compliance between the two is a little different. 12X** for the X1 and 10X** for the Z1. This might account for the slightly less extension with the Z1. Just my guess at this point. Regards, |
Hi Griff, Going by this limited info, they're not likely the same. BTW, do the owner manuals in VE library have more specs? The X1 has response to 60K. Maybe it was developed for 4-ch. The shibata stylus might be an indicator and it should have relatively low inductance for high frequency extension. The Z has 4mV out, as opposed to 2.7mV and extension is to around 30K at best. Two of the Z (Z-2?) are listed as 2.4K ohm impedance and 4mV - looks like a 150MLX. You could measure DC resistance with a digital (only) meter and see if they are close. I'd guess that the X is around 4-500 ohms and the Z is closer to 800. This is a wild guess based on very little information. Still, the SQ might be closer than you'd expect.
If you're not in the habit of measuring DC on carts, just hold the probes to the pins (not connected to anything else)of the cart just long enough to get a stable reading. Digital meter only.
Jico sold a complete MM cart w/SAS about 5 years ago. It was called the SAS MM1 and people raved about it. Anybody get one of these? At the time there was conjecture it was a Philips cart. The specs look like a JVC Z: http://stylus.export-japan.com/sascartridge.php You never know.
Regards,
|
Hi Fleib,
I have a ad page from JVC which describes the X-1 and the Z-1, both on the same ad page. Therefore they are quite similar. The Z-1 is the later model and has a slightly higher output. I hope this is due to the magnets, and not additional winding's on the coils. I have one of each. The SAS for the Z-1 is on order from Jico. The stylus holders are not the same but as you have stated, perhaps a bit of trimming will cure that. But we are assuming that the Z-1 is the lesser of the two and that has not been established. JICO only supplies the SAS for the Z-1. Now why is that? Perhaps because it is the better of the two? Perhaps because it was a much larger seller so their would be a larger market for replacements? Unanswered question as far as I know! But I am going to find out! The X-1 with the JICO DT-X1 MKII stylus or even the surprising Tonar's replacement for this X-1 makes this cartridge the best M/M I have ever heard. Better than the Grace Fe, better than the Technics 205C MK IV, better than the AT 150 Anv., and as good as my London Decca Jubilee. I own many of Raul's cartridge of the week. None, and I "mean" none of them can compare to this X-1. I'm hoping that the Z-1 is as good. I say this because there are many of them that pop up on the auction sites. As my comrade Nikola (Nandric), has stated, you can spend years looking for an X-1. I would have liked to have waited and found a backup for the one that I have before I alerted anyone but Nikola has 'spilled the beans' sort of to speak! I will keep all informed when the SAS from JICO arrives for the Z-1 as to how it will perform and if it will be a contender. I do have high hopes! If you run across a JVC X-1, buy it if it has exceptable coils. Either the Elliptical Tonar or the Shibata Jico are availabe for stylus's. Both are absolutely stunning performers. Regards |
It looks like Jico has a SAS for the Z1 - four or five listings, might be a cross reference. I don't know about these JVC styli. They are the same basic style and if the joint pipe and cantilever are the same, you might be able to trim some plastic on the stylus holder and get a fit.
Maybe someone at Audio Karma knows, or you could buy a cheap Z1 replacement to see if this might work. Regards, |
Hi Fleib, Raul mentioned this JVC X-1 some time ago but I was not able to find a single one for two years and give up. But in the last three months I got three samples. One of which in NOS condition. Your specs apply to this one: beryllium cantilever and Shibata stylus. The other two (bodies) needed a new stylus. One got Tonar replica with elliptical stylus the other got the Nivico DT-X1 ,Mk 2 with also elliptical stylus. My comrad Don got the first mentioned as present and ordered the new Jico DT-X1,Mk2 with Shibata stylus. Both my Nivico and his Jico are provided with tension wire. Don is very impressed even with the Tonar stylus. I hope he will post about his Jico stylus. But as far as I know this Jico is not an SAS. My NOS X-1 is the only MM cart which I can't distinguish from my best MC carts.
|
Hi Nandric, I'm not familiar with JVC pulse train transducer analysis, but there's a lot I'm not familiar with. AFAIK a pulse train is irregularly shaped square waves and a pulse train is used for such varied things as radio frequency signal analysis, radar and optical guidance systems etc. I believe it's related to pulse code modulation which is the basis of analog to digital conversion.
The Ortofon article is based on analog data from a study they did sometime around 1980- 82. I think they were originally studying things like tip mass analysis. They mounted an accelerometer on the headshell. The article shows the relationship between amplitude and phase in phono carts and dispels some commonly held myths, namely the affects of electrical and mechanical parameters on phase linearity.
You were lucky to find an SAS stylus for that cart. Jico does not have a wide selection of SAS. The database has it listed as beryllium/shibata, 2.7mV, VTF 1.55 - 1.75g, 12cu (100Hz?), and response to 60K. Is this right? What else? Nice specs, similar to some 4-ch models with that output and low inductance? How did the stylus change the sound, more exact and slightly less sweet?
Regards,
|
I've generally been sceptical about the advantages of a dedicated mono cartridge over the 'mono' switch on a phono stage or preamp...👀❓ But when Thuchan informed me that "I wouldn't believe the difference".....I took the hint..😀 Although he wanted me to buy the Ortofon Cadenza Mono...I opted for the cheaper AT33Mono at less than $400....😜 With only 6 hours playing time so far on the cartridge......Thuchan was right👍🎶 I thought that I didn't own many mono recordings (unlike Thuchan who has hundreds of mono jazz issues)....yet I discovered a full box-set of early Ray Charles as well as Fats Waller and Fats Domino...😎 Then I found my mono Brubeck 'Take Five' (alongside its stereo brother) and mono Henry Mancini 'Music from Peter Gunn' (also alongside its stereo sibling)...😘 A disc of The Everly Bros Greatest Hits was re-discoverd as well as a double album set of remastered 45 singles compilation including Elvis, Buddy Holly, Eddie Cochran, Carl Perkins, The Big Bopper, Gene Vincent, Shirelles, Chiffons,Gene Pitney and many more....is highlight of my collection...😍 But the revelation was the remastered set of Elvis' singles on 'Elvis 30 #1 Hits' and 'Elvis 2nd to None'...😘🎶 It's hard to describe the transformation that occurs with the sound of the true mono cartridge playing these familiar grooves as the normal audiophile descriptive terms simply don't apply...😷 One thinks that terms like 'soundstage', 'depth', 'accuracy', 'positioning', 'transparency' etc would not apply to mono....but they do indeed..😘
The recent Beatles Mono set delivers the least 'bang' over the simple mono-switch...perhaps because they used stereo cutting heads...❓😥 But for any audiophile with even a modicum of good mono records (and multiple arms or detachable headshells)....a $400-$1000 investment in a true mono cartridge will enrich your listening pleasure....😘🎶 Take it from Thuchan....👏 |
Hi Fleib, JVC proudly mentioned their 'pulse train' method to anylize 'tranducers' among which our beloved carts. 'Your phase problem' is also mentioned as objective. To my taste the X-1 is the best MM cart I have ever heard so far. This is not my 'field' but it may be the case that this result is the, uh, result of this method? |
Hi Dover, Nice little primer on harmonics. Energy storage in speaker cables? Seems to be more about amplitude than phase, but I guess it could be both if they talk about arrival time. I didn't watch the whole thing. As Lebowski might have put it, Dude doesn't abide passive electronics in speaker cable. A zobel for ultrasonics might be the only exception and that could be considered a speaker crossover addition.
There's a better solution IMO. Put your amp between your speakers and use short speaker wire. A long interconnect is easier to optimize. It doesn't carry the current that speaker wire does. Interconnect still has capacitance and inductance, but with the exception of phono cables, I think it would tend to be less easily compromised in long runs.
Regards, |
Fleib, Thanks for posting the link to the article on phase response in MC's/MM's. It does go a long way to explaining differences of opinion, listing preferences and system attributes will play a significant role. Here is an interesting video that highlights similar issues around phase preservation, and its impact on sound reproduction - although the video is 20 minutes it is well worth a look. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgK87tmRVeY |
|
I was thinking, there might not be much interest in phase as it relates to a phono cartridge. People seem to want cart recommendations and have little interest in technical matters so I'll just say this: I base my conclusions on Ortofon measurements of phase in phono carts as appeared in an Audio mag article in 1983. These are actual measurements, not theory, and that's why most EEs get it wrong. Phase shift is determined by mechanical properties, high frequency resonance and mechanical damping. Electrical resonance only modifies this in MMs and has no affect in MCs. http://www.vinylengine.com/turntable_forum/viewtopic.php?t=33679
The thing is, if you consider this in "ultimate" terms, our older records were mastered using tape and phono carts to check SQ. Perhaps that helps explain playback preferences?
Regards, |
Thanks Tom, 780DC is pretty close to those other Signets. I think virtually all AT V magnets are paratoroidal. It's the TK9, 10, and AT22 - 25 that are supposed to be true toroidal. The difference is in the way they are wound. Toroidal are donut shaped and the wire is wound from inside to outside, instead of around the outside of a circle. I don't know the difference in windings between these toroidal and paratoroidal.
There's an interesting interview here by Roy Gregory: http://www.symmetry-systems.co.uk/Images/pdfs/Michel-Reverchon.pdf
Michel Reverchon talks about phase. Specifically, the need for phase integrity and extended bandwidth. There are implications for all kinds of music reproduction including phono, but that's for another day.
Regards, |
Regards, Fleib: Off to a dinner engagement last night so a hurried post. Apologies.
The Signet 5.0 stats were from a stored download, a search turns this up, post #4:
http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/showthread.php?t=577672
A few to add to AT's paratoridal coil carts: 5v, 7v & ANV150.
Peace, |
Hi Timeltel, I guess the database threw me another curve. 550mH and impedance 750Kohm?? Is that a typo?
The 5Ea, 7Ea, 7LCa are all 5mV, 550mH, 800DC, 900 impedance. That's from a Signet spec sheet. Apparently nice relationship between DC and impedance. Impedance is resistance with reactance figured in. Reactance includes the affects of inductance or capacitance.
The 440 OCC is 5mV, 490mH, 790DC, 3200 impedance. The MLa is 4mV, everything else the same. 150MLX - 4mV, 2.3K impedance. Looking at the relationship between DC and impedance is confusing. One would think the TK7 with more inductance would have greater impedance than the 440 or 150. Impedance is specific to 1KHz though, which could make a difference? They might have changed the way they calculate impedance? Clearaudio only lists DC and they call it impedance.
The 440 has a cantilever resonance around 16KHz which reinforces a rising high end and tends to give an unfortunate brightness loaded at 47K or more. I got acceptable response loaded at 32K, 150pF. I tried a 140LC stylus and no discernible difference. It sat on a shelf until I tried a 152MLP (beryllium/ML) stylus which transformed it with very nice performance at 47K.
My sample of the MR5.0 is nearly 830DC in one channel. Is that spec 750DC?
Regards, |
Hi, Halcro: I'd tried the 5.0 with an AM20 (3 x 7 nude elliptical), not sure why the 155Lc never made it to the 5.0?
Fleib: The Signet 5.0 carts (from Signet spec sheet) are 550 mH & 750k Ohm, 5mV output for all. "Para" denotes alteration or modification. Current AT carts with "Para"toroidal coils are the 150MLx, 440MLa, 120e and 100e.
That 440MLa--- picked one up when they were introduced. Like your TK10ML, perhaps five hours on it. 4mV & 3200 Ohm output inductance with a noticeably bright midrange. (Available.)
Peace, |
Regards Timeltel, Halcro, I bought the TK10ML II new in the '80s before I knew anything about loading. My MM phono input was 47K and I could select from three capacitance settings which seemed to do nothing with this cartridge. I played with VTA, checked alignment etc. I think I sold it before it was even broken in, a decision I now regret. How could this cart have response on test reports that looked like a ruler line, and sound like this?
The AT22 - 25 and Signet 9 and 10 series all had 85mH inductance! Dlaloum tells me they had toroidal type coils and were sort of experimental TOTL types. http://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?topic=88878.800
"The AT22-25 and TK9/10 were a generation earlier, they were more expensive to make due to having true torroidal construction... all the rest of the VM series have always used para-torroidal design - so the earlier generation were magnetically superior - but the difference may have been very minor.
The shorter cantilever on the ATML series made a bigger difference I think, than the torroidal structure on the earlier series...
Seems to me the ATML180 is up there as one of the all time greats.
My own measurements of the TK9 show a noticeable midrange trough (not a bad one, but not the best I have seen either) - which is caused (I think) by a combination of magnetic losses and cantilever flex losses - the low inductance is reflected in the high end rise to a resonance beyond the audio range (cannot recall right now the frequency - would have to look up my measurements).
The higher inductance of the ATML allows it to achieve a flatter frequency response at the high end - would love to get my hands on one to measure - and see what the midrange trough looks like... I have a feeling it will/would do better than the earlier series or the AT150 - mostly due to the shorter cantilever."
Low inductance carts are generally harder to load, but have great potential. All thing being equal, a shorter cantilever will have a higher resonant frequency. The Grace F9F has about the same HFR as a 6mm boron cantilever. Higher inductance MMs are voiced so that electrical resonance (LCR) moves HFR to a frequency that compliments response. If a MM has extremely low inductance, playing with capacitance loading is fruitless, but potential for transparency and resolution is high.
I recently purchased a Signer MR 5.0ML. This series has the same stylus fitment as the current 100/120 series, but the plastic stylus holder is a little taller and must be trimmed slightly to use on a 440/150. I tried the cart at 50K and 47K and it was decidedly uninvolving, underwhelming. I didn't expect much because DC was out of spec and it was inexpensive. Luckily, the stylus still has some life and sounds great on my 440. The stylus is beryllium/ML. I bought it for the stylus and got lucky. The MR 5.0 entire series has the same generator as the 440. For years this was the go-to motor for many ATs. Carts like the 160 have the same motor, and numerous others.
Regards, |
Regards Professor (Timeltel),
Ahhh....the trusty ATN155Lc...😜 Probably my favourite stylus assembly of all time...😎👍 It should work a treat especially if you mount the cartridge in either the wood Yamamoto or Ortofon LH8000 which I know you love....😀
I've found that arm parallel (or ever so slightly down) works a treat🎶 The 'highs' with this cartridge are the most delicate, transparent and ethereal I have ever heard....so I can readily understand how it may sound "hot" with anything but the BEST set-up....😖 Perseverance will be well repaid I hope.....good luck...😎👍
Regards |
Regards, Fleib: I've both the TK-9LC & AT-22. Both are able to capture nuance and detail and well suited to orchestral and chamber music. ML styli sometimes seem overly analytical, much prefer Shibata, HE, or preferably, LC on beryllium. Highly regarded by some, I've not sought the TK10ML.
Halcro--- also have Signet 5.0 Basic and 5.0E carts, they seem a little on the "hot" side, especially the Basic. After your 5.0Lc comments, wondering now why I've not been tried either with an ATN155Lc stylus? Thanks, Henry.
Peace, |
Hi Nandric, You must have been angry when you wrote your last post because it's semi coherent. Once again you have me saying things I didn't say. Yes, I was somewhat embarrassed by that last set of exchanges between you and I on a public forum. Now you want to start again? Why is this nonsense worthy of everyone's time?
In the past you called me a clerk and now I'm arrogant, an arrogant ex clerk I suppose. Well, I know what I know and I know I never worked as a clerk. So what does that make you, mistaken? I worked in two different high end stores and was the "turntable guy" and the record buyer in probably the busiest high end store in the US. Besides working all day with record players I did such things as calling Scotland and buying out the Lyrita inventory. Now you know part of it, but who cares? This ended 25 years ago, why is this an issue? I was also cofounder and vice president of American Hybrid Technology. You can still buy the same phono stage, only now it's called Walker.
I also took a couple of logic courses in college. I might not be a logician but I know some faulty logic when I read it. I'm asking you to cease further name calling and personal attacks. When I said you are a lawyer and skilled at persuasion, or something to that effect, you took it as an insult. It was a compliment. Some of our most revered people like Abraham Lincoln were lawyers. Storyboy was right. This BS is inappropriate. If you have further problems with me not concerning cartridges, send me an email.
Regards, |
Hi Dover, The Koetsu Black is within 2dB, 20 - 20K ? That's the Goldline? The older Black seemed to have more bass than + 2dB, made it sound "mellow/lush". Their redesign really made a difference.
The Ruby was loaded at 100K and that's less rise than most MCs. I never owned one, but it seemed a little forward at first listen. In that respect one has an advantage with loading a MM.
Regards, |
Hi Lew, It seems to me that VTA/SRA has more to do with harmonics and loading is more about bright/dull. Of course they're interrelated. Wondering what conclusions await.
Regards, |
Dover, Good point. The warning may simply relate to the possibility that the VTF will change if the vertical and horizontal parts of the arm are not plane parallel. That's no big deal to fix. In any case, I did ignore the warning and have tried changing VTA, which obviously requires one to violate the "rule" they put forth. |
Hi Fleib, I'm not sure about the Professor....but I've "messed" with the Signet TK10ML....and your description of "ear-bleeding" is apt....😱 👀 It was one happy day when I packed and posted this impostor to another unsuspecting victim....😜 Of happier experiences.....I recall you recently bought a Signet MR5.0Lc...❓😎 I've just revisited mine on a Yamamoto HS-1AS wood headshell....loaded at 40K Ohms and 100pF capacitance...and I find it delicious...😘 Regards |
The issue with the OCL-modified Ruby is not so simple as to label it only "bright", a character that can indeed be tamed by adjusting VTA, in most cases. I would say there is more to it than that; but now it has been so long since I listened to it that I have to start over in my assessment. But most assuredly you are right that it is reasonable to play with all possible parameters of load and SRA. |
Regards Timeltel, Thanks for the specs, most interesting. It seems that the neighborhood of 240mH is the practical limit for AT inductance lowering. Beyond that it gets too bright for the mandatory 47K load recommendation, but that doesn't entirely explain Signet. Did you ever have a TK9Ea or 9LCa ? 550 ohms imp. 85mH tapered beryllium. The 10ML also has 85mH. When new the 10ML II could make your ears bleed. Just wondering if you've ever messed with one of these?
Regards, |
Lew, Interesting arm. The sub arm is like the Souther linear tracker. I see no reason other than tracking warps, why you can't stray from maintaining perfectly horizontal arm tube. As mentioned previously, the SRA orientation of the OCL tip might not be in agreement with original F9, and the tip itself might have a more forward orientation. I can't confirm the later, but people have reported such.
I can't give you a mathematical reason for loading down, other than it's your only option for brightness with respect to LCR. Inductance is probably around 300 - 325mH, but adding capacitance will not help. A cart with lower high frequency resonance would normally get brighter as that resonance is lowered into the treble region, but that's not the goal anyway. LCR manipulation is specific to mechanical response and everything except playing with resistance is contraindicated. Mechanical response could be different with a different cantilever and tip.
There is a quasi-mathematical reason to try loading and stylus swapping. Albert Einstein said, insanity is trying the same thing over and over and expecting different results. If I remember correctly this is a NOS body or something like that? It could be a dud. You have a couple of good exemplars, so..... you could see what it takes to get results with a known entity.
Regards, |
Regards, Fleib. Had the manual downloaded, lost when the magic smoke escaped from my previous laptop. Found these specs elsewhere, seem to be from reliable sources.
ML140-170 OCC: Coil impedance 2.5 kOhm @ 1kHz. Inductance: 380 mH @ 1kHz.
ML180 OCC: Coil impedance: 1.4 kOhm @ 1 kHz Inductance: 240 mH @ 1kHz.
Cantilever for 170/180, gold spluttered boron pipe, beryllium rod for the 140/150.
Raul wrote of the ML180 in this thread, he thought highly of it.
Peace, |
Fleib, You wrote, "Have you ever tried it with the sub arm not horizontal?" Yes, of course, that's what happens if you raise or lower the tower at the rear, which is easily done with the DV505 and one reason why I like the tonearm. I've tried it both ways, rear end up and rear end down. As mentioned, this did not do much to ameliorate the problem. The DV505 does have VTA "on the fly" (though I would never adjust it during play). The question is how to interpret the manual as regards the possibility that optimal VTA setting might result in a nonparallel relationship between the horizontal and vertical parts of the tonearm. Since the vertically pivoting part is so short from stylus to pivot, a very tiny change in arm height at the rear adjuster has a major effect on VTA. No, I have not swapped Ruby bodies and Ruby styli. Interesting idea. Do you have a math-based reason to believe that the OCL will sound better with some load resistance other than 100K, when the standard elliptical Ruby stylus does sound excellent at that R? |
Hi Lew, I just read the 505 manual or part of it. I see what you mean. Have you ever tried it with the sub arm not horizontal? If it doesn't function properly like that, your only recourse for SRA is to use an angled shim in the headshell. Not exactly convenient for working things out.
I think it would be more productive to consider this a different cart than your other Rubies, and it might well be. Is it difficult changing resistance in whatever you're using for this? It wouldn't hurt to try and it might be the solution. I'd also experiment with a different arm. I'm bothered if I don't have VTA on-the-fly. The 505 would drive me to distraction. BTW, have you tried the stylus on one of your other bodies?
Regards, |
Regards Timeltel, The database has the 150 w/berrylium and the 170-180 w/boron. Maybe it's a mistake. I was hoping you knew inductance. I'm guessing it's 370mH, but that's just a guess based on the 150MLX - 2.3Kohm, 350mH. But they might have stronger magnets.
I think I have those specs somewhere. I'll have to look.
Thanks, |
Fleib - It is interesting to note that the high frequency 2db rise at 20k with the Grace F9 is greater than any of my moving coil cartridges ( Dynavector Karat Nova 13D, Koetsu Black ). Certainly the F9E I owned with original stylus was a little thin and anaemic sounding, a bit wiry in the top end. Lewm, The Dynavector 505 manual I have simply says the sub arm should be parallel, the word geometry is not used. It may simply be that they believe all Dynavector cartridges should be parallel to record for optimum VTA. One possibility is that the damping imparted by the dynamic tracking force spring may be suboptimal when the arm is not level. The Dynavector 501 manual I have does not make any comment, nor does the 507. |
Fleib, As noted, I was running my re-tipped Ruby into a 100K load (not 47K) with no added capacitance (meaning capacitance due to cable and Miller effect is probably in the 100 to 150pF range). Also as noted previously, I did try both raising and lower the tonearm. Actually, to my surprise, these maneuvers had only subtle effects on the problem I perceived. The OEM Grace Ruby that I also own sounds wonderful under these same conditions. I need to consult with Peter Ledermann; perhaps he will want to have the OCL-tipped Ruby go back to him for a check-up, or perhaps he will be able to tell me that I need to use a different load R and C. Another parameter to consider is headshell mass; maybe I need a lighter mass headshell.
The caveat about changing VTA is that the cartridge is mounted in a DV505 tonearm. Thus, when one raises or lowers the arm with respect to "level", the vertical portion of the tonearm creates an angle with the horizontally pivoting part. In their instruction manual DV intimates that this is not a good idea as far as tonearm geometry; I am not really sure why, and I wonder why they warn against essentially doing what it takes to maximize VTA. The English translation of the original is not helpful on this issue. However, I can imagine that Euclid might know why not to do it. |
|
Regards, Fleib: Gold plated beryllium cantilevers for 150-180, not sure about the 140 which IIRC is an elliptical.
AT ML150 OCC:
MicroLine stylus Output voltage 4mV / 1kHz 5cm / sec 0.95 ~ 1.55g needle pressure (optimal 1.25g) Playback frequency 10-30,000Hz Channel separation 30dB / 1kHz Channel balance 1.0dB / 1kHz Compliance 10 — 10 -6 cm / dyne Load resistance 47kΩ Internal impedance 2.5k 7.0g weight
Purchased with snapped cantilever. S.Smith reported a challenging repair, there was very little left to work with. The Optimized LC diamond gives definition to the need for good setup practices, perhaps as demanding as those Acutex LPM 4xx STR carts Henry recently rediscovered :).
Prace, |
Panasonic EPC-450C II is a strain gauge cartridge that hit the market back when 4 Channel Quad was still on the market. I believe it was based on Sao Win's work. Being a strain gauge type and not at all compatible with a conventional phono stage, it required a special box and aye, there's the rub.
My first experience with this was using a Panasonic 4 channel adaptor box that had provisions for the strain gauge (there were also a few receivers so equipped). This was indeed a compromise as the quality of the box was not good, but your only alternatives were a)Jeff Rowland made an adaptor box as one of his first products (I have never seen nor heard one of these) b) There was a tube-type box you could "homebrew" shown in the old "Tube-be or not Tube-be" book (a treasure trove of tune amp/preamp info that I wish I still had a copy of) and John Iverson's (of Electron Kinetics and Electro Research) EK-1 strain gauge preamp which I have had experience and will be the subject of my next post. |
Timeltel, I forgot to ask the specs of the ML150? I thought I had it written down somewhere, but it eludes me. The database has it listed as 2500 ohms, 4mV. It looks to have the same generator as the 170, 180 with only the cantilever being different?
Speaking of cantilevers, in a general way I think more rigidity gives more detail/exactness often at the expense of that relaxed, natural Denon type presentation. Just as you can't emphasize one extreme of the frequency spectrum without relatively affecting the other extreme, more detail can result in clinical rather than natural.
Beryllium seems to give the best results with ATs IMO. It's more flexible than boron so it's a little more like aluminum in that respect, but it's also the lightest. Was the original ML150 stylus broken? Harold NTB, There's a thread on Asylum about rise time. Luckydog discusses the problem with quantifying it. I thought you might be interested.
Regards, |
Hi Raul If you reading this please come back. I enjoyed your input i bought a AT150ANV and some other cartridges based on your recommendation. I love that cartridge.
I used to follow this thread everyday when you were posting, it appeared you got painted as the "evil genius", for your strong views, but that was what also made the thread a great read. Without your input its never been the same. |
Greetings Timeltel, I have one manual for six F9 models including the F, E, and L. Ruby is not included. All have impedance of 2.4K and same output except L is +2mV. I naturally assumed it has stronger magnets. Thanks for confirmation. I also assumed this is the earlier manual. The F (line trace) is the top with response to 50K, but it seems the stylus is the only difference. There's a response graph for F taken with 100K load. Response is up about 2dB @ 20K, and 3dB @ 30K. It looks like high frequency resonance is around 30K. There is a slight treble droop centered around 8K, but it's very slight. One curious thing is capacitance load was 80pF. There is no recommendation in the specs.
If Ruby impedance is 1.7K with no drop in output, it would imply stronger magnets and less inductance. Still, it might be a good idea to keep capacitance low as possible. AT's seem best at 150pF total. This might be a little high for a Grace, don't know exactly why. Resonance seems high enough that it wouldn't matter unless excessive.
Lew, Assuming you have azimuth correct, I think SRA and resistance load is the solution. I'd drop the rear of a 9.5" arm about 4 or 5mm, more if you have clearance and take it up from there. You might want to check alignment. If you're running 47K you might not have to load it down, but that would be your only option for excessive brightness. Regards |
Hi Fleib, The statement made is: 'I put forth that this now pathetic thread be put to rest, and let you 2 take to personal email'. You call this 'comment' and even 'contribution' without being 'contribution'. I call this qualification without a single argument. Besides his advice make (also) no sense . I our private emails we are polite and kind for eacht other. A dispute make only sense when public. To teach our 'lion' lessons is pretty arogant from your side. But that is obviously your nature. As far as I know your background was employee by some HIFI shop. |
Regards, Lewm: Offered for sale by a college classmate, a 1958 Giulietta Spider Normale, $400. I declined because a broken motor mount had been replaced with a piece of 2x4" lumber and tied down with a coat hanger. Wish I had it now!
Your F9-E rebuild--- Picked up an AT ML150 OCC & had the S. Smith optimized LC/ruby rebuild. Somewhat clinical, exceedingly accurate transient response. Diminished/moved upwards cantilever resonance is a likely suspect. Recalled from a Peter L. comment a number of years ago, (paraphrase) "Some may prefer the elliptical stylus on aluminum cantilever".
Early reviews of the F9-E referred to a forwardness in the hfs. This may account for the two figures given for output impedance, 1.7k & (later?) 2.4k.
Maybe Fleib has an opinion?
Peace, |
Fleib, Please re-read my philosophical post. I say precisely what you say, Storyboy has a perfect right to hang out here as does anyone else. My point was that if he or anyone else finds the thread to be "pathetic", that person has the option of not hanging out here. After all, he was including your posts in his generalization. I am not sure that Storyboy equates off-topic posts with pathos, but I guess I am guilty of more off-topic posts than anyone else. So I will be the one to stay away until I have something of interest to contribute regarding MM cartridges. Meantime, I would love to find an Ortofon MC2000; if anyone….
By the way, Timel, my very first sports car was a 1967 Alfa Romeo Duetto Spider that I bought used while in med school. I drove it for 6 years in New York City, parking it only on the street in all weather and never in a garage. It was completely and utterly reliable every one of those days until I sold it. |
Regards, Fleib: To answer a question you didn't ask in this thread: I've both the Grace F9-E and gold bodied F9-L. Output (relative to volume) travels with the stylus assembly. The manual that accompanied the 9-L gives 3.5mV output for all F9's except the L at 5.5. Output impedance for all is 1.7k Ohms.
There are two manuals available for download at VE. Curiously one states 1.7K Ohms, the other 2.4k. Specs "may change without notice" printed at the bottom. In the cartridge Database the Ruby which was introduced at a later date is shown at 2.4k.
Lew (OT): I've a car enthusiast friend who says one needs two Alphas- one to drive while the other's in the garage. Good luck with your resto.
Peace, |