What does 90% of the Absolute Best Sound Cost?


Like many things, I have come to believe that the cost of incremental improvements in audio come at exponentially increasing costs - e.g., big improvement from $5K to $10K, less so from $10 to $15K, etc. All of us have our limits regarding what we can/will spend to achieve our best possible/practical audio experience. So, a couple of questions that I am sure are at least somewhat subjective.

A. What does it cost, in terms of components, interconnects, and direct furnishings (e.g., racks, isolation pads, surface room treatments, etc.) to achieve 90% of the absolute best sound possible?

B. What % does $50,000 get you?

FWIW, my setup is at about $21,000 actual cost ($32,000 original retail) and I am really happy with it right now. All of my incremental spend for the next couple of years is going to be working the room itself. Looking forward to your perspectives!

128x128mattsca

Showing 1 response by waytoomuchstuff

I'd like to add that our subjective appreciation of the music is linear.  The cost is exponential.  

Let's say, for example, the best speaker "bang for the buck" is $300/pr. A clear audible upgrade may cost twice that.  Then, twice that.  Then twice that. Until we reach the stratosphere. You'll also find that lower price points are "all business" where the lion's share of the investment is in sound quality.  As we move up the ladder, elements of esthetics, build quality (yes, does have an effect on sound quality, but not linear) come into play.  Those factors may be very important to the owner who's willing (and able) to invest in them.  Money well spent.

Obtaining quality and/or quantity is not expensive if you target one, or the other.  Getting both simultaneously gets pricey in a hurry, but also represents the best-of-best in world-class gear.

Back when I was a dealer, our "reference" 2-channel system topped out at $80k retail.  It's nice to see this aligns with the "take this exit" price point with many of you.