@millerCarbon, you do realize that tungsten carbide is 9.0 on the Mohr hardness scale and silicon carbide is just slightly harder at 9.5 on the Mohr scale? Diamond is at the top with a hardness of 10.0 for reference.
Any engineering data on plain bearings (this is not a roller element bearing) will show that one part of the bearing must be considerably softer than the other part.
Using two almost equally hardness materials with just a tiny point contact will result in the oil film being dispersed and direct contact will take place. This will result in a slow lapping process that will disperse extremely fine and hard particles in the oil. These particles will wind up in the brass bearing supporting the main shaft and get impregnated in the soft brass housing.
Impregnating either silicon carbide or tungsten carbide particles onto a brass plate makes a very nice lapping tool. Do you see where I'm going with this?
I would immediately dismantle this spindle bearing and clean it as best you can before you start destroying it. Replace the disk with a Delrin or Teflon disk, and be hopeful that no permanent damage has been done.
A turntable thrust bearing at the bottom of the spindle is a very difficult engineering problem. There is insufficient velocity between the two surfaces to maintain a oil film and with a heavy platter the almost infinitesimally small contact area insures a very, very high loading per square inch compounding the problem. That is the reason that self lubricating materials are used in these applications. Under no circumstances should two very hard materials ever be used together in this application.
The original designer switched from the harder Delrin to the softer Teflon probably due to the Teflon having better properties as a self lubricating plastic. Since it wears faster in this demanding application he was wise to use the brass plate to back it up. It will no doubt "talk" to you when the ball reaches it in the form of rumble.
Sorry to burst your bubble but you really out smarted yourself with this modification. Even you admitted that it wasn't long before rumble from wear had you digging into it again.
BillWojo
Any engineering data on plain bearings (this is not a roller element bearing) will show that one part of the bearing must be considerably softer than the other part.
Using two almost equally hardness materials with just a tiny point contact will result in the oil film being dispersed and direct contact will take place. This will result in a slow lapping process that will disperse extremely fine and hard particles in the oil. These particles will wind up in the brass bearing supporting the main shaft and get impregnated in the soft brass housing.
Impregnating either silicon carbide or tungsten carbide particles onto a brass plate makes a very nice lapping tool. Do you see where I'm going with this?
I would immediately dismantle this spindle bearing and clean it as best you can before you start destroying it. Replace the disk with a Delrin or Teflon disk, and be hopeful that no permanent damage has been done.
A turntable thrust bearing at the bottom of the spindle is a very difficult engineering problem. There is insufficient velocity between the two surfaces to maintain a oil film and with a heavy platter the almost infinitesimally small contact area insures a very, very high loading per square inch compounding the problem. That is the reason that self lubricating materials are used in these applications. Under no circumstances should two very hard materials ever be used together in this application.
The original designer switched from the harder Delrin to the softer Teflon probably due to the Teflon having better properties as a self lubricating plastic. Since it wears faster in this demanding application he was wise to use the brass plate to back it up. It will no doubt "talk" to you when the ball reaches it in the form of rumble.
Sorry to burst your bubble but you really out smarted yourself with this modification. Even you admitted that it wasn't long before rumble from wear had you digging into it again.
BillWojo