We Need To Talk About Ones And Zeroes


Several well-respected audiophiles in this forum have stated that the sound quality of hi-res streamed audio equals or betters the sound quality of traditional digital sources.

These are folks who have spent decades assembling highly desirable systems and whose listening skills are beyond reproach. I for one tend to respect their opinions.

Tidal is headquartered in NYC, NY from Norwegian origins. Qobuz is headquartered in Paris, France. Both services are hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud infrastructure services giant that commands roughly one third of the world's entire cloud services market.

AWS server farms are any audiophile's nightmare. Tens of thousands of multi-CPU servers and industrial-grade switches crammed in crowded racks, miles of ordinary cabling coursing among tens of thousands of buzzing switched-mode power supplies and noisy cooling fans. Industrial HVAC plants humming 24/7.

This, I think, demonstrates without a doubt that audio files digitally converted to packets of ones and zeroes successfully travel thousands of miles through AWS' digital sewer, only to arrive in our homes completely unscathed and ready to deliver sound quality that, by many prominent audiophiles' account, rivals or exceeds that of $5,000 CD transports. 

This also demonstrates that digital transmission protocols just work flawlessly over noise-saturated industrial-grade lines and equipment chosen for raw performance and cost-effectiveness.

This also puts in perspective the importance of improvements deployed in the home, which is to say in the last ten feet of our streamed music's multi-thousand mile journey.


No worries, I am not about to argue that a $100 streamer has to sound the same as a $30,000 one because "it's all ones and zeroes".

But it would be nice to agree on a shared-understanding baseline, because without it intelligent discourse becomes difficult. The sooner everyone gets on the same page, which is to say that our systems' digital chains process nothing less and nothing more than packets of ones and zeroes, the sooner we can move on to genuinely thought-provoking stuff like, why don't all streamers sound the same? Why do cables make a difference? Wouldn't that be more interesting?

devinplombier

I don’t know if any of this resonates with those following this thread

@livinon2wheels 

It certainly resonates with me. I believe the choices you’ve made show admirable self-awareness. More often than not it’s not so much what we do that matters as why we do it. Best wishes for a prompt return to normal after the tragedy you’ve experienced.

I cant tell the difference between Tidal MAX recordings and the same high res on the HD in my Aurender N20 > MSB Cascade > MSB M500 Monos > Estelon Forzas.

My general understanding is as long as the bits arrive faster than they need to be used up (filling the buffer), that a decent DAC will convert them nicely to analog.

I dont subscribe to the "hifi router" camp lol , nor switches or CAT6 etc.

USB was developed almost 30 years ago to replace and consolidate the old serial, parallel and PS/2 ports for PC peripherals, and later became ubiquitous in small electronics chargers.

How this pedestrian interface became quasi-standard in high-end digital audio is puzzling.

USB evolved tremendously over the decades and USB4 is a powerhouse, however many of today’s high-end DACs and streamers are still stuck in the USB 2.0 era.

 

How this pedestrian interface became quasi-standard in high-end digital audio is puzzling.

likely due to no agreed upon standard amongst manufacturers. Agree that an interface optimized for high-end audio would be very beneficial