Update on good Ethernet switch
ASI mentioned before I didnot want to say the brand until I heard the Ethernet switch not only after 300 hours which was recommended having a OX over controlled clock ,
and with what myself always do the weak link on any audio component starts with the stock power cord , for minimal monies the Pangea using Cardas grade 1 copper 6-9s. Awg14 sig,Mk2 , and getting rid of the 50 cent bottle neck fuse I put in a 1.25amp 20mm L ,slow blow synergistic purple fuse these increase fidelity at least 5-7% the switch itself At least 5% if you know the name Jays audio for transports ,his other company LHY Audio the SW8 Ethernet switch for $595 nothing has all this in a nice machined aluminum case , even the uptone ether regen or Sonore deluxe using a with fiber optic which btw lessens the realism imo both were used witha Sbooster2 LPS , ,theSW8 Ethernet switch is a great buy ,and if you add a decent power cord and upgrade the fuse you will be rewarded further , 7 of us reviewed this and 6 out of 7 thought it was a noticeable improvement vs the others there were2 other brands which were more ,that were not even that good and had switch mode pS
| Post removed |
@cleeds yes, we do know that the technical aspects of Ethernet is beyond your comprehension. Why do you keep coming back to discussions that include the technical is beyond my comprehension.
regarding your experiment, see the first paragraph in this post. You refuse to listen to what Qobuz says about their own service. |
It is a simple to understand what is happening here and I think some credit should be allowed to those who argue and insist that an ethernet switch can make absolutely no audible, sonic, detectable difference and for that matter even a measureable difference can not result and that is because of the TCP/IP protocol which they love to cite and being the explanation for their convictions. These people are the same who have argued about "Perfect Sound Forever" and the source and origin of that claim are place such as as consumer audio magazines and consumer magazines such as Consumer Reports in yoru country and also now things like Wikipedia and they combine that with a basic understanding of how computers work. I say we should allow these people some credit because they have read and consumed enormous amounts of written content as evidenced by they're liberal use of "cut and paste" to support their arguments with graphs, charts, and "data" to appear "scientific" and then many of them also watch the 'experts" who post You Tube videos and so it is a club like a religion.
What they share has been pointed out bu others here and that is that they have not tried such devices and when they do their expectation bias revs to "high gear" and they are driven to post here sometimes claiming as one has in this thread that they are laughing at us which is "ironic". So what these people should but won't do is set aside their religion and bible texts and actually conduct some kind of experiment which may or may not reveal and expose their narrow, confined, limited "thinking" which is more simple repetition of hat they have consumed and the rest of the users here can continue to report their experiences having already overcome the "bar" of "digital sound is perfect forever". |
@tonywinga what do you base that on? Where is your supporting evidence? Give a reference to anything to support your claims.
because none of it is true, I should know, it is about me. |
@clearthink you are wrong. I have tried Etherregen and various “audiophile” Ethernet cables. and you are also wrong about cut and paste, I have practiced networking on a daily basis since 1999, and I have worked on some really interesting commercial audio projects. Needless to say, no commercial audio applications use these products, but they only care about what actually improves sound quality. |
