Ugraditus is calling....again. Phono stage?


There is likely nothing wrong at all with present phono stage but you know how it is.

Present analog front end consists of.

Nottingham Analog Spacedeck with Spacearm.
Shelter 501 mk3 cartridge with maybe 250 hours on it, regularly treated with Lyra.
Dynavector P75 mk3 phono stage.
Feeds into Lyngdorf 2170 via Nordost Red Dawn RCA cables.

My thoughts were that possibly the Dynavector is the weakest link and would pay most dividend on an upgrade but.....

What do I perceive I am lacking right now?
Really hard to say as this is highest quality analog front end ever owned.
Possibly lacking a little in sheer scale and dynamics? Bass is very very good, instruments are well separated and defined.
Just as an overall presentation I feel it lacks that final wow factor as a whole.
Not sure if that makes any sense?
Please comment honestly especially if you feel it is another area that may reap larger benefits. Or if should just leave well alone....lol.

Oh btw I am fairly sure it is setup correctly in regards to vta etc, at least to the best of my abilities right now. And yes setting it up correctly from initial purchase did make considerable gains in sq.
128x128uberwaltz
Only have one set right now
Wireworld gold eclipse 7.
The rca are Nordost red dawn which are traditionally supposed to give a leaner sound so I would be surprised if it was just the make of cable.
How bad it sounds I am thinking something a little more involved
Uberwaltz, a possibility that comes to mind, which could account for the symptoms you’ve noted with both the phono stage and the Oppo, is that the balanced cables are miswired such that their ground pin (pin 1) is interchanged with one of the two signal pins (pin 2 or pin 3) at one end. Thereby causing one of the two signals, as provided by the source component, to be connected to ground in the 2170. Which would adversely affect the performance (and eventually perhaps even the health) of the output stage of the source component.

If you have or can obtain a multimeter, check that each of the three pins at one end of each cable is connected to the corresponding pin at the other end. And also check that each of the three pins is not connected to either of the other two pins.

In doing so, it would be best to use a magnifying glass to view the pin numbers that are marked next to each of the pins, as their symmetrical layout makes it easy to confuse pins 1 and 2 with each other when comparing the two ends. And for that matter, perhaps the assembler became confused for exactly that reason :-)

Best regards,
-- Al
Al
Kind of where my thought process was moving as I noted a few posts ago that SOMETHING is likely wired incorrectly direct from the factory.
But you are right, the cables are relatively easy to test, if they pan out I guess I could plug them into the Gold note and repeat the same test which would hopefully point the way further.

And agreed it is easy to confuse the pinout from one end to the other.
We use similar style plugs for 270vac power in our equipment and some of the "apprentices " in the shop regular misconnect one end in relation to the other, good job we have circuit breakers on all circuits...lol!
Well cables measure correctly and thank the Lord for my lighted magnifying glass!
All go to correct pins and no multi crossed signals so next will try them in the Gold note but its time to venture to the airport for another week of fun in sunny Wisconsin!
As I think on, the same issue arose on both the OPPO and the PH-10 sothe common factor there was the cables or the 2170 inputs.
I have ruled out the cables as being terminated incorrectly and I would be shocked if it was just the tonality of those cables making such a profound difference.
Which would leave just the xlr inputs on the 2170.
How would I easily test them?
Well it looks like the Wireworld eclipse6 were just a poor fit in the mix.
Bought a cheap pair of Audioquest Coral xlr I saw on local cl for a test and a whole world of difference.
Still think I prefer the sound of the Nordost red dawn RCA right now but I can at least listen to the Corals without wanting to turn it off!
Grannyring is making me a couple pair of xlr cables for me to test so it is good to know it was just the timbre of the cable that did not gel here.
Robert

An art cartridge did indeed arrive, however it was not the art 9, it was the art 7, they shipped the wrong one.
They are completely in the wrong but are now baulking about replacing it with the correct one and suggest I try it which I really do not want to do.
I will work it out....lol.
The ART 7 is supposed to be a fine cart as well, but if you ordered a 9 and paid for a 9, then you should....get a 9. I wouldn’t even mount the 7 in case the seller tries to tell you it can't be returned since it’s been used.

Hope it gets resolved quickly.
Robert
that was one of my main concerns on opening it up. The other being from Al,s information provided it would appear the art9 would be better suited to my musical tastes.
Uber,

Just got a slight itch to try something new with the PH-10 - A tube buffer.

I know there is a GoldNote tube buffer supposed to be released, who knows when? along with the PSU, but in the meantime I just grabbed an iFi iTube2 from Amazon. 

Very excited to try this reasonably inexpensive addition.  Whether or not it integrates with the rest of my system, we'll have to see.

But, if it does...I can't think of a single other "tube" phono stage with the flexibility of the PH-10.  I should have it in two days, and will report back.

https://ifi-audio.com/portfolio-view/micro-itube2/
Robert.
Looks very interesting indeed.
Lots of good reviews.
Please keep us updated.
About $500?
$399

And of course 30 day return policy with Amazon, in case it's not a good fit.
I usually forget to check Amazon! 

The wife lives on it but I am still stuck on eBay...lol
Well..

This little gadget is very cool.  On my 3rd record so far.  I haven't played around with all the settings which include:
-3 types of tube sound signatures: classic tube, set, and push-pull
-3 sound stage signatures: normal, enhanced, and 30* enhanced
-3 Bass signatures: none, +6db, and +12b

I've been using classic tube, enhanced soundstage, and no bass boost.

There is no loss in detail, but much better warmth, air, and soundstage.  I guess this thing does exactly what its supposed to do.

Build quality is excellent, and placement is easy since it's so small.  I've used iFi products before, but placement was always a PITA, because the inputs & outputs were on opposite sides of the unit.  Not the case here.

More listening to do, but I'm very happy with my initial impressions, and highly recommend the iTube2.  So much fun, for so little $$$

Now I wish I could try it with a 2170 - Room Perfect and tube goodness.  Might be a very cool match.
Robert
Definitely sounds intriguing
I wonder who I might know that still has a ph10 and a 2170.....
I've been enjoying the PH10 and can say ive never listened so much and so long to my albums they just seem so natural and clean now.
Anyone hear anything regarding the optional PS?
@rsf507 

Should start shipping the first week of June.

On another note, as is very common (stupid, crazy?) with me, I am switching up my system again, and moving on to another phono preamp.

Listed the PH10 yesterday.  We'll see what comes up next, and I'll probably start by looking at the start of this thread more closely to see what else was initially recommended for starters.

so it goes..
Nice to see somebody who changes their equipment more often than myself....lol.

Most earlier phono suggestions were tube based and as you just bought that ifi microtube not sure if that would have much point
Uber,

Valid point.  I'm actually using the iFi with an old NAD cd player & it's working out wonderfully..  I mean I'm playing CDs again, and having fun.
@uberwaltz,

You move through gear so fast, how can you really evaluate anything?
@slaw

Not really sure why you have decided to make it your mission to criticize my actions or posts but whatever makes you happy. Not my intention to provoke your ire, I am just here to learn what I can, share my experiences and enjoy the music!

Lets see though...
Lyngdorf 2170..... likely here to stay
Nottingham Analog Spacedeck……. likely here to stay
GoldNote PH-10 phono stage.... likely here to stay
Cartridges... yes they will be an evolving mission
Cables...… pretty much done with them now Grannyring has made me a superb set of XLR cables.

Bluesound Vault 2... was thinking of an update after 18 months but nothing much better around at all.

Speakers, yes just decided to update from my old Wilson Witt mk1 to a pair of the new Tekton Di, which have rave reviews by actual owners everywhere.

Nakamichi 582 tape deck.... likely here to stay.

Underpant….yep changing them frequently.

Seriously though not sure of your "dig".

Most of my purchases have been used and as used there really is no "burnin" required so what I hear is what I get right away and some items I have bought just were instant, "well not a good fit at all"

In all honesty if my posts and actions offend you then probably best to just ignore them. Its a hobby, I enjoy it and the music that flows forth and if I decided to mix things up earlier to get to where I am now then where is the harm in that?

Oh and when I listen to music at least 5 to 6 hours a day I get PLENTY of time to evaluate changes I have made tbh, at least in my system to my ears and imho.

@rsf507 

$2000 used/new.

I've heard the following:  Pro-Ject Tube Box S, iFi iPhono2, Parasound JC3 Jr, PS Audio NuWave Phono, GN PH10 - for stand alone units.

Used the built in phono stages in the following: Emotiva TA-100, Marantz PM6006, Parasound Halo Int, Mytek Brookly DAC+, and Micromega M100.

The top 4 best sounding to me, in order: PH10, NuWave Phono, Mytek, and Micromega.  The difference between the PH10 & Micromega isn't much, and hence another reason I've parted ways (maybe temporarily with the PH10).

I have ordered another PS Audio unit, but I plan on using that as more of a utility device - to archive, use ADC, and as a phono stage.

I feel I might have to wait until my budget can increase to really step it up.  I'm in no hurry though.
Uberwaltz, +1

I'm worse than you are, and enjoying music in the primary goal, but there's no harm in trying new things.  For me, that's part of the fun, and part of this hobby.  It's whatever makes you happy.


@robelvick 
IMO only I think it will be hard to top the PH10 at your price point but please keep all posted in what you try.
Short list:

EAR 834P deluxe
Lehmann Silver Cube
Manley Chinook
Parasound JC3+
Rega Aria

All but the Rega, I would need to purchase used, but I see them listed pretty often.  I really enjoyed the PH10 used with the iFi iTube2, but that was  make-shift (half-assed), so that's why i've included a few true tube preamps on the list.

Of course, I'm going to be using the PS Audio NuWave shortly, and I'm curious to see how it integrates with my new system.  It's been almost a year, and two systems later, since the first time I owned one.  I remember loving it, so we'll see..
Nice shortlist.
I assume you will be returning the iFi to Amazon as it was more of a tube sound test than anything?

I know the Manley was highly recommended earlier, just did not sound like it would have been a good impedance match to the 2170.
Uber,

Still undecided on the iFi.  I'm using it with my CD player right now, and like what i'm hearing.  I find that I'm listening to albums that are easily accessible through Tidal, but now with a "tube" sound and it's a blast.

That being said, if I return it, that's an extra $399 towards a new phono preamp.
Uberwaltz, the Chinook has particularly low output impedance (50 ohms nominal according to its manual; 91 ohms and a recommended minimum load of 2.5K according to its website description), so it won’t have any problem driving the 2170. Or most other preamps or integrated amps, for that matter.

Best regards,
-- Al
Al,
I thought much earlier it was thought that most of the tube phono stages discussed would not be a good match for the 2170?
Not that it matters too much at this stage as I am very happy with the ph10 and Robert has moved on from the 2170.

Edit....just reread your first post on the impedance issue and yes you stated the Chinook should have no issues at all with the 2170.
Not sure how I translated that to be all the tube phono stages mentioned would be a poor match!
My bad but still very happy with the ph10 so far.
Post removed 
Gold Note just announced the release of the external power supply (PSU-10) for their PH-10 phono unit which is a super inductive & chokes power supply.  

(Dealer disclaimer) 



Just checked out Gold Note's site, and all the PSU details are there.  Looks very cool.

Thanks for the heads up @sksos1 
Update:

The PS Audio has had a day of use now, and it's much better than I was expecting, fitting in fantastically with my current system.  I'm no longer going to be seeking out a different phono stage.

Until the itch comes back, of course..
Not sure how much benefit I would see from a separate psu for the ph10 as I presently feed it from my equicore 1800.
Especially at $1100.
Uber,

I agree with you.  Maybe best to wait until some actual PH10 users have had some time with the PSU, and hear their findings.
Anyone hear the new Gold Note PSU-10? I heard it is retailing at $1250! Ouch. Maybe $750 and I would try one.
Thought the retail was $1100 according to an email I got from Toska, but would charge me $1000 as I bought the ph10 from him.

So not sure where $1250 came from, however even at $1000 I am going to pass as with my equicore 1800 supplying juice not sure if it would be a cost effective $1000 upgrade for me.
I have the PSU-10 and it takes all of the great things about the PH-10 and significantly improves on them. Much lower noise floor, especially if you don't have a power conditioner. (I measured with an SPL meter) Better soundstage and more precise imaging. More bass slam and beautiful high end sparkle without being harsh. It really is a great unit. Oh, and @robelvick, the combination of the PH-10 and PSU-10 absolutely slays the PS Audio NPC. I know - I have one and compared back to back. Shoot, the PH-10 kills the NCP, but then again the NPC has a very good ADC, which is what I use it for. I cannot recommend this combination highly enough. If there is a better unit for $2500 out there, I'd like to hear it! 
amgradmd,

Thanks for the update.  Makes me wish I would've held out a little longer so I could have tried the PSU-10.

I also did test the NPC and PH-10 side by side, and in my system, the PS Audio outperformed the PH10 with just about everything I threw at it.  I don't use the ADC, just the phono stage.  Just my opinion of course, and my choice of music.

I'm sure the PH10 and PSU-10 combo sounds fantastic though, as I did love the PH10 when I was using it.  You can find the NPC used for under $700 now, and in my case it was a no-brainer since I was trying to fund other items.
I'm glad the NPC works for you. It's a great unit for the price, especially at $700. The PH-10 and the NPC are two of the most versatile units out there, for sure. I found the noise floor, dynamics, and the transparency a little better with the PH-10, but, like you said, that's in my system, not yours. Also, I run the Gold Note Mediterraneo which came with the Gold Note Donatello Gold MC cart at 0.4 mV. So there might be some synergy at play. Who knows?

As an aside, I don't think anyone is surprised at how good the Mediterraneo is, but I am absolutely floored at how good the Donatello Gold is for $1k. So is my supreme audiophile snob buddy who was very skeptical of the Donatello. I think it slightly outperforms my Soundsmith MIMC Star at half the price. And that's a phenomenal cart! Just so you know, I am also a big PS Audio fan and have their P10 power regenerator, their Directstream DAC, and their amazing Stellar M700 monoblocks (and I mean really really amazing) .So I love me some PS Audio, too! I've heard heard PS Audio is working on a Stellar phono preamp in addition to a BHK phono preamp. I'd expect the Stellar to be solid state with at price of around $1-1.5k and the BHK to be tubed with a $5-6k price tag. They have been working on the BHK for quite some time, I hear. I expect the BHK to be a statement piece and the Stellar to be amazing value. 
Ok, i just ordered the Gold Note PH-10 directly from Italy, the price was so much nicer without VAT as i am not in EU, hope to get it next month. The color is black. It would be nice to have phono preamp with two independent phono inputs, i'm looking forward to check it.  
@chakster who did you order your PH-10 from and can we ask what the price was? I paid $1295 NIB which I thought was very good. I also heard that GoldNote will be raising the price of the PH-10 by end of summer. :-( 
The new power supply for the PH-10 has been out for awhile now, anyone try one or even hear one?
At $1100 I gave that a miss.
Not sure I would get that value as I power everything already through an Equicore 1800.
@rsf507 

amgradmd (above) is the only one who has given any thought about the PSU, at least on this forum.  He had good results.

Uberwaltz - I think the whole idea of the PSU is to not to have to use the internal power supply in the PH10, have all those duties in a separate unit.  I don't doubt using the Equicore is an improvement, but i'm sure the PH10 could get even better with the PSU too.