Long, one can bi-amp with 4 mono amps. I think it depends on your speakers and what your goals are. If your looking for greater dynamics or volume, more power might be better. If you have speakers with large impedance swings and your looking for cleaner sound, bi-amping with smaller amps might be better. These recommmendations are used with built in cross-overs in mind. Bi-amping with active crossovers (assuming of course that the active cross-overs are of equal or better quality than the built in passive ones they are replacing) should provide an increase in dynamics as well as cleaner sound. Of course you can go for broke and use 4 big mono amps with superior(?) active cross-overs. This is of course based on the assumption that you are using a 2 way speaker system. Ideally every driver would have it's own dedicated amp.
Two Stereo Amps, Bi-amp or Monoblock?
From what I have seen, the normal step-up from a bridgeable stereo amp is to buy another and use them in monoblock format. You could however buy another and leave them in stereo and simply use one amp for both channel tweeters and one amp for both channel woofer/midrange. I understand that this is not a full 4 monoblock bi-amp configuration, but I wonder if the bi-amp advantage is glimpsed to a large extent in this format and perhaps a better sonic improvement over running the two amps in monoblock. Thoughts or experiences? Aside from sonic benefits of either, what is the resulting power increase from the two formats? In the "bi-amp" format you would also have the ability (or advantage) to offer a different amp to the tweeters and to the woofer/midrange; whereas in the monoblock you would need to match the amps.
8 responses Add your response