heaudio123
In a way, I don’t blame them. In particular, blind listening tests take a lot of work to organize, and the tests themselves are no fun at all - they’re time-consuming and tedious. I also suspect that many who clamor for such tests don’t really believe in them, but simply reference them as a way to engage in argument.
I’ve suggested here for years that there’s a real opportunity to conduct such tests at an audio show. None of the measurementalists have ever shown an interest and of course with the current Covid crisis, it wouldn’t be possible.
Which could be verified in about 2 minutes with an oscilloscope ...geoffkait
Are you volunteering? Please report result ...C’mon, Geoff, you know it doesn’t work that way. People here who say they favor measurements, double-blind listening tests, and other "scientific" studies expect others to do that work for them. They don’t seem to have any interest in actually conducting such tests themselves. (It’s likely that many wouldn’t even know where to begin.)
In a way, I don’t blame them. In particular, blind listening tests take a lot of work to organize, and the tests themselves are no fun at all - they’re time-consuming and tedious. I also suspect that many who clamor for such tests don’t really believe in them, but simply reference them as a way to engage in argument.
I’ve suggested here for years that there’s a real opportunity to conduct such tests at an audio show. None of the measurementalists have ever shown an interest and of course with the current Covid crisis, it wouldn’t be possible.