Thoughts on Speakers for a Small Audio/Video Room


Hoping to get some thoughts from the group here. 

I recently moved into a dedicated TV/audio room, but the room size is on the small side: 15.5ft x 11.5ft.  As pics will show, there's quite a bit in there, so empty volume is decreased further due to that.

I've been using Aerial Acoustics Model 7B speakers, which I've been very happy with in larger spaces, but they seem to be overwhelming the room and I'm getting fairly overwhelming bass. Vocals have sort of a chestiness/congested nature to them, and there are bass undertones to most songs.  If I play records loud, I need to activate my rumble filter, which I never used to have to do.  As a sidetone, I also have Monitor Audio Gold Reference 20's in my collection.

Preamp is a recapped Mcintosh C35 and amp is a recapped MC2255.  Phono pre is a VTL TP 2.5 II, TT is a Marantz TT-15S1 running a SAE1000LT MM cart.

I borrowed a friend's Sonus Faber Electa Amator II's and they sounded very good in my room - sweeter, more natural, no congestion, though I did give up bass slam/impact, which I kind of missed.

Here are pictures of the room:

Front:

Back:

I'm playing around now with plugging the rear ports of the Aerial, as well as putting some acoustic panels in the back corners of the room.  Both of those seem to have helped quite a bit.

As far as measurements, those Aerials are currently about 80" apart, 16" from speaker back to front of cabinet, 96" from each speaker to the listening position.

What's your opinion: With some room treatments/plugged ports, can the Aerials work well in a room of this size, or do I need to move toward smaller speakers?

If I go smaller, any thoughts on something like the Sonus Faber Concerto Domus (there's a pair local to me) or Sonetto III?  Those seem to be more modestly sized, don't go as low.  Would those be at least a lateral to the AA Model 7B's, or a step down in terms of overall speaker quality?  I only mention Sonus Faber models as I was impressed with my friend's speakers and generally do enjoy the smoother, more musical speakers and will give up some detail/pinpoint accuracy if needed to avoid brightness/listening fatigue.

Thanks all. . .

 

captouch

Showing 3 responses by erik_squires

Am I treating for general reflections or bass in particular when doing ceilings?

@captouch - Depends on your needs. At least for general reflections but if you find yourself lacking space to put bass traps then using that space to do both is a good idea. The Am Acoustics room mode simulator can really help determine if that would help.

Depending on where and what frequency another related option is the GIK Acoustics Soffit Traps which can run wherever 2 surfaces meet.  You could (not saying SHOULD) run soffit traps all along the edge of the ceiling, which would be extremely good bass traps. 

An intermediate approach is a mondo trap which is a panel, with space from the ceiling to the trap which can do both reflections and mid bass.

The ceiling area in general can be used when the overall room remains too reflective but we are out of places to put absorbers. I have also found that unless you have very high ceilings treating the area between speaker and listener can really enhance imaging and spaciousness.

My one bit of advice btw is treat the ceiling. A panel or two up there, white perhaps, will be amazing.

Use the AM Acoustics room mode simulator to see what problems you have, where they will be and what frequency.  It may help with placement and bass trap decisions.  Also bass traps can be put in behind your listening location equally well if you don't have the room up front.

Absolutely you'd love Fritz.  Does free trials.  Get something wiht a split paper woofer and ring radiator.  DOn't know the model names.