The Sound Quality Of Commercially Pre-Recorded Reel-To-Reel Albums


I’ve owned reel-to-reel machines since 1976. I’ve only used them to make copies of my vinyl LP’s at 7 1/2 ips, and I’ve been quite pleased with the quality of those recordings. I have never once purchased a commercial reel to reel pre-recorded album.

I understand that commercially pre-recorded reel albums were mass produced and recorded at 3 3/4 ips and 7 1/2 ips. Were the pre-recorded tapes generally sonically superior to home recorded reel tapes made from LP’s?

128x128mitch4t

Showing 1 response by rcprince

My main experience with a pre-recorded tape was when Harry Weisfeld played the Mercury recording of Gershwin's Concerto in F, which I owned in its original vinyl version.  It was the first time I had heard the conclusion of the piece without any distortion and with full bass, as the record grooves went almost to the edge of the center.  Had we recorded the record, we would have also recorded that inner grove distortion and compression.  So for that reason, I'd have to think the pre-recorded tape version, if done well (and Mercury certainly did), should be better than the vinyl, as you can avoid the shortcomings inherent in the vinyl pressing.  

 

That said, I guess if you had a perfect, uncompressed vinyl record that you played back and recorded to R to R  with a particular cartridge whose sound was not flat but which you preferred, you might like the sound of the tape you made over the pre-recorded tape.