I thought i was clear:
I said we scam ourselves first and last... (consumers as reviewers)
By ignorance of acoustics science...
I did not accused as many here the personal character of reviewers into a complotist plot to scam people...
Acoustics ignorance once i had studied it is everywhere not as a complotist perspective from anyone , but by lack of concrete applied knowledge of acoustics concepts...
Reviewers are like the consumers, they ignore acoustics, it is not deliberate, it is a consequence of the universal focus on the gear design by subjectivist as objectivists...
I knew it ONLY by my experience in my room and studying serious audio designer and top scientists as Dr. Gorike , Edgar Choueiri, Floyd Toole... Etc
To be more clear : Most reviewers i read or listened to are sincere and honest ... I am perhaps naive but it is my impression...
"All" reviewers do this? Well, maybe.
I suppose you could be saying a couple of things about gear reviewers:
1. They *intentionally obscure* the larger factor of acoustics so they can more effectively sell or promote equipment.
2. At least some gear reviewers are intentionally obscuring the larger factor but even if it is not intentional, it is the byproduct of this type of review.
I am not sure which one you believe.
Then i concur with your last paragraph opinion :
3. Gear reviewers review gear. People who watch these videos may or may not be informed about the role of gear in acoustics, but their role is narrow and the responsibility for a wider perspective is on the viewer. This is not unlike many other things we read or watch.