Now Suppose,
That i justify my ignorance of acoustics by claiming that , price matter, gear matter, my taste matter more than acoustics basic...
We often read also that musical taste matter and all musical styles forms are equal...
Sorry but this is wrong...
Acoustics basic concepts including psycho-acoustics matter more than price, gear, and my taste generally...
If i claim the opposite as cheapaudioman selling low cost gear or Jay selling high cost gear, i deceive myself and others as they did unvolontarily by ignorance ... As do any consumers who buy without end in so called upgrades instead of doing basic study and experiments...
Suppose i had a cancer...
Which music i will pick to relax ?
According to my taste ?
Sorry no....
metal music will increase your tumor, classical will decrease them...
It is simple verified experiments in science :
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30632030/
Here the conclusion of this serious study :
«In this work, we found for the first time that different musical
genres can induce a different response considering cell prolifer-
ation and gene expression in tumor cells. More analyses are
required to determine how exactly a musical stimulus can induce
a response in supposedly non-auditory cancer cells, so far as to
alter the expression of genes involved in apoptosis and cell-cycle
control. We suspect that frequencies and amplitudes of the
soundwaves can change relative gene expression, but we still
do not fully understand the mechanisms behind this phenome-
non. More experiments are needed to unravel this mystery be-
cause understanding the effects of a specific type of music on
cancer cells could advance the potential of music therapy for
cancer patients, not only for the psychological effects, but as a
possible co-adjuvant to traditional treatment.»
There is no taste in acoustics, no taste in audio, only acoustics facts...
In medecine there is no taste either, only efficient music or destructive one...
in audio most people scammed themselves , reviewers as consumers ...
And for the troll who acxcused me of repeating the same sentence, it is the second scientific articles i refered to in this thread...I gave content,i discuss with my brain working, i dont troll people giving repeating idiotic sarcasms..
And for the other troll trailing behind my avatar for few years now , i will decide if i close the thread or others people will decide by staying silent...
Nobody arrogant will decide if a thread is closed throwing sarcasm or deciding by his own decision ...
The audiogon staff decide...
|
cheapaudioman is not the subject of the thread...
I use it to explain who scam who...
Cheapaudioman imho is trolling for clicks.
move on
|
For those who insult me here because they are what they are,
A new important article about music perception and why acoustics science matter,
Who repeat itself here:
Hilde45 attacking all my posts in many threads since few years, and deep33 trailing him...
or me posting new material to think about, if we own a brain :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-025-00915-4
Abstract :
Abstract
«A great deal of research in the neuroscience of music suggests that neural oscillations synchronize with musical stimuli. Although neural synchronization is a well-studied mechanism underpinning expectation, it has even more far-reaching implications for music. In this Perspective, we survey the literature on the neuroscience of music, including pitch, harmony, melody, tonality, rhythm, metre, groove and affect. We describe how fundamental dynamical principles based on known neural mechanisms can explain basic aspects of music perception and performance, as summarized in neural resonance theory. Building on principles such as resonance, stability, attunement and strong anticipation, we propose that people anticipate musical events not through predictive neural models, but because brain–body dynamics physically embody musical structure. The interaction of certain kinds of sounds with ongoing pattern-forming dynamics results in patterns of perception, action and coordination that we collectively experience as music. Statistically universal structures may have arisen in music because they correspond to stable states of complex, pattern-forming dynamical systems. This analysis of empirical findings from the perspective of neurodynamic principles sheds new light on the neuroscience of music and what makes music powerful.»
The brain-body dynamic here at play in musical perception is at play also not only when we play a musical instrument, but also in our room when our ears/speakers/room form one vibrating sound source...
What i called tuning our ears/speakers/room using among other devices resonators ...
It is us consumers and reviewers who scammed ourselves by ignorance of acoustics basic concepts and experiments...
i had other articles to prove all this...
but i will stop here...if nobody is interested...
|
Your mind is exhausted then the thread may be exhausted too but it is not synonymus...
instead of sarcasms as the poster above for example a curious mind can ask why
what i claimed here is true ?
Perhaps you already know that and why and it felt correct for you to close the thread In one sentence...
I dont like sarcasms nor "innuendo" ...
I am direct and polite...
Be silent or contribute...
The thread will close by itself anyway...
The consequences for audio are evident : the perception of timbre is one of the main aspect for music and cannot be measured by few techs numbers but must be listened to by ears/brain. ( one of the reason is in psycho-acoustics linked to the way the ears lives and brain create sound perception in his own non linear time domain).
|
My point in this thread is about the way we scam ourselves by ignoring acoustics principles and trusting subjectivist reviewers or worst,objectivist reviewers...
Why ?
Because the 2 groups condition us to focus on gear design and pricing instead of focusing us on our own power to control acoustically our system/room not just buying upgrades..
And even if we cannot go very far in our our living room because our wife will not gave us any right here, we must read about acoustics to understand what is "sound"...
Thats my point...
Of course it can be useful if we must buy something to read reviewers of the 2 groups above, I am not against reviewers. They are most of them as ignorant than the consumers. because for them gear pieces matter more than acoustics..
For me it is evident it is the reverse, acoustics makes us able to put any system at his peak potential...
|
it seems sarcasm had replaced thinking...
You dont catch that a set of different resonators dont work as only one...A set work on a large band frequencies not a thin band. And a set work by modifying the room pressure zones distribution by his placement. A resonator not only absorb some frequencies but diffuse some others.
When you exacerbate a resonance you compensate with another tuning...
Comb filtering is not just a problem it is a tool...
How do you think Dr Gorike has deal with comb filters effects as a tool to create one of the best headphone ever the AKG K340 ?
He use 5 tuned Helmholtz resonators distributed at a specfic placement in the dual chamber of the headphone..
I studied his patent to modify and improve my pair..
I did as him but in my room using the same acoustics principles..
Anyway it is useless to discuss with you, i remember your sarcasms from my discussion with Amir.
Good evening...
So you moved a 100 resonators around, tuned them all...they interact/complicate things, exacerbate other resonances or not, comb filter or whatever.....but, you placed a 100 resonators all in their ideal lil spots by ear??? not a single measurement involved....
Well, Mah, the bards shall sing of your acoustics genius for many generations, hereafter (starting with me... ).
|
I am very conscious that most people are not in retirement as i am, most people dont have the luxury of time to study and experiment, most people either dont have the luxury to have a dedicated room.
In some case they have money then they purchase gear pieces...
Then my claim that acoustics concepts concrete understanding matter more cannot be popular not a very welcome claim...
But truth matter...
I hope people begin to understand also that by acoustics i do not speak about room acoustic solved with few panels and devices but more importantly about a change in our own perception and understanding of sound..
Hearing is innate, listening must be learned and our mind must tame our brain as well as our room...
When our mind begin to tame our brain, i means that our biases change not only with parameters change but by our conceptual change...
Buying gear is secondary... And not interesting as such compared to the improvement you are able to create by yourself in the room and in your mind......
|
I already explained what i did...
And this youtube video present only One kind of Helmholtz resonators...
Then in your mind because you ignored the physical principle all resonators must be done in the same material and in the same way...
Buy an acoustic books to understand why there is many other way to design one...
Helmholtz originally use bottle with a thin aperture tuned ...
I also used 50 bottles of different size but prefered to use also tubes of various volumes of some lenght with a neck of various lenght because it was more easy to modify in the tuning process ...
None of mine were designed with wood...
I used tubes...
When you work with ONE Helmhotz resonators as in this video it is because you want to modify some very specific thin range of frequencies...
I uses a distributed large set of resonators specifically located in the room and in relation to the speakers and listening position because i wanted to act on a larger set of frequencies and using location in the room as a tool to modify the room itself not just some specific frequency range......
Some resonators were next my speakers drivers, some behind me etc...
is it difficult to understand ? if so buy a book of acoustics...
What is a speakers with a vent hole ?
A Helmholtz resonator... with only one hole...
I modified my small speakers on the same principle guiding way...
I designed 100 not as a task...
I begun with one...
I observed the result...
Then i designed few others...
I discovered that location matter not just size...
Because a room is itself a resonator...
etc
Read book instead of trying to mock me as you did few months ago and right now in your preceding post...
my patience is thin with sarcasms...
Are you so surprized when a dude tune a piano by ear?
It is the same thing to tune a room...
Or are you surprized if someone do calculus in his head instead of using a computer?
My goal by the way was not "perfection" but results satisfying me and at the same time learning acoustics...
You buy gear upgrade, i learn acoustics... Is it so shocking ?
I used my ears , you do not and do not understand how , is it shocking ?
You tuned a 100 resonators by ear??
Tubes... straws..all acting in unison??? serving as a mechanical room equalizer all tuned by ear????? Holmes, let us grab a hold of reality together for a minute...and you go ahead, follow some of this diy video on how to build a helmholtz resonator. Start cutting some wood, start with 1
Take some measurements and figure out what ’equalizing’ you may even need, to begin with...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUsyeBkNVEI
|
|
A consequence of this acoustics perspective and necessary training, is that all reviews are heavily conditioned by the acoustics conditions of the listening system/listener/room, then reviews are not an information which can indicate way more than personal taste.
Real synergy must be tested with many pieces of gear and measured techs.
For music recent scientific article demonstrated that we perceived "timbre" the same way among all cultures, and "timbre" is the root of musical various musical scales in use all around the world..
The consequences for audio are evident : the perception of timbre is one of the main aspect for music and cannot be measured by few techs numbers but must be listened to by ears/brain. ( one of the reason is in psycho-acoustics linked to the way the ears lives and brain create sound perception in his own non linear time domain).
If all reviews are subjectivist taste, and if all technical gear measures are objectivist limiting insufficient few numbers; the only way to assign a meaningful value to a system/room is to study the acoustics basics and the varying acoustics parameters to makes each one of us in control of our own experience. Then free from our ignorance and easy prey for maketing.
|
Egyptian priests used resonators to "equalize" room temple sound... Before Hemlholtz..
I had 100 because i conducted experiments for many years with no cost materials from tube 8 feet high and large and straws and all dimensions in between.. I tuned them by ears...it takes me 2 years to complete 7 day/7...( Acoustics was my hobby then ) Way more fun than throwing money on a new dac because we are unsatisfied...
One single straw as part of a resonator mouth located at the right place create an audible effect...The location of the resonators matter too not only their dimension and cross ratio.. I also use them in a way to make a kind of mechanical crossfeed too for the speakers with some near the drivers...( i could not suppress crosstalk anyway in my room then i turned this impotency into and advantage i designed my version of mechanical crossfeed)
Now i dont own my past room, i must had sold my house but i used Helmhotz principle to modify my now small speakers vent hole because they are badly designd on all speakers for esthetical reason and cost...I modified my headphone too ...
For the measures:
you know that timbre is not a simple addition of pure frequencies because the ears perceive sound in his own time dimension. Timbre is a set of large band...
I used my ears to tune to my liking all my resonators in fonction of the timbre i wanted for the musical instruments like we tune a piano...My ears "measures" them one at times..each one compensate for others... There is a trade-off...
When all was completed my stereo system completely vanished..
My prefered opera Kurt Weill 4 penny opera soundfield was around me with natural timbre...
The singers walking and singing i was able to "see" their head turning...And sometimes singing next to my chair or near my shoulder...
Dr . Choueiri call that the spatial attributes of sound...H3e described them in his articles..
if you think that you can have this with one resonators or 2 sorry no...It is why without knowing what i did at the begining i add one at a time, each time gaining better S.Q, with each tuning.
but if you buy the BACCH system it will do this in a perfectly controlled way...
I called my resonators set a mechanical equalizer because it is exactly what it was...
The equalization process was tuned for my ears not by an electrical means...
The BACCH system will be better for sure but i know what it will do because i made it mechanically...
But some aspects cannot be made mechanically, as the measures of HRFT, or the control of the crosstalk cancellation etc...
It is why studying acoustics reading about sound perception is more valuable than reading reviewers who most of the time dont know really more about acoustics concepts than the customers who listen to them ..
It is why people invest big money in this hobby often without knowing what they do as an obsession..
i prefered to inform myself...
I was fascinated at some point by theoretical acoustics... What is sound... I discovered not only Dr. Gorike genius reading his patent about my headphone, not only Dr. Choueri genius insight into spatial aspects of sound control but a genius in pure acoustics theory i read in ectasy... He explain sound perception like no one else ... This is another story... I posted about it in a thread about spiritual aspect of music...( i posted many scientific articles about acoustics there but very few were interested in spite of the fact that there is a revolution in acoustics and sound perception right now)
In life i am mostly interested by mathematics,linguistic,philosophy and acoustics and their relation...
I sure know what a tuned resonator is, higher end studios tend to use them as they can be made more discreet....had one in a former house, found something more broadband and better in recent times.
When you said you had a 100 Itty bitty ones that served as a "mechanical room equalizer", it started to sound a lil kookalicious.
On the same note, the effect of one can be clearly measured. I suppose you didn’t get that far or did you? Or did the effect of a cluster 100 whatever...of them do a number on ya?
|
Sound is like a beast..
It exist in a volume...
To understand and perceive this "volume of sound" qualities in all his aspects you need to understand a minimum of acoustics concepts with your ears in your room. Then you need to modify your room to feel how the perception change with it.
If not you will feel that the sound come directly from the recording by dac/amp/speakers into your brain...A superstition we can observe among audiophiles who forgot the speakers is more a part of the room than just a part of the amplifier and dac....
And if you dont like the sound , you will invest in a often useless upgrade, instead of optimizing or modifying your gear and room. if you like the sound,you may say it is my "taste" without knowing that it could be way better at low cost...
Acoustics has nothing to do with "taste"...
What sounds good to you? That’s all that matters. Trust your ears. As you progress through this hobby your senses will evolve. Always trust your ears. You are the only one that can educate yourself. Enjoy the music.
|
Perhaps you are educated and know who Helmholtz is and why he is the father of modern acoustics and what his main tool was before electronics: mechanically tuned resonators ?
Keep sarcasm and think...
Ok... starting to sound just a tad wacky now...a bit shun mooky...a bit crystalline kookalicious...maybe some stalactites and stalagmites are next in this acoustics intervention, eh?
There is many devices in mechanical acoustics... This is one thing...
There is other devices completely secondary compared to acoustics devices...
Audiophiles called them "tweaks" ... I explored everything by the way in the last 12 yeears but never bought tweaks (save Schumann resonators )... i had opinion if i can justify them by facts or experiences ...
For example Schumann generators works but it is a mere tweaks and the effect is real and subtle but do not compared to the main tools from acoustics science..
I decided i will not spoke anymore of my non-acousticals experiments because they are secondary and funny experiments and because narrow mind use sarcasm to mock others... i dont like that...
Acoustics science rules audio not tweaks or separated gear pieces costly or not...
|
The most stunning thing i ever experienced in audio, is the huge modification induced by the room materials composition not only the walls, floors, cellings composition, but the furniture... And the geometry and topology of the room...
More than that i was flabbergasted by the effect of small resonators made of cheap materials had on my sound experience... I created 100 of them... I call them "mechanical room equaliser"
Acoustics control dwarf choice between cables or between dac and amplifier... The only exception will be going from a very bad piece of gear to a top one...
All matter when we create an audio system , even cables... But nothing compare to acoustic analog control...
i dont own a digital room control ( save my modest equalizer now) or which will be the ideal tool and gear : the BACCH system for sure...
Why did i know if this system is so astounding if i did not even never listen to one ?
i studied acoustics...
I know what are the spatial aspects of sound and how to control them in my room... But an analog system as mine was is not ideal even if it is spectacular... It is not refined the way the BACCH system is...( my mechanical system dont adress for example HRTF measures)
It is the only upgrade worth of my money...
I am happy and dont think about buying one now , my budget is very thin...
Ok i shut my mouth...
|
Exactly!
And they create battle (subjectivist versus objectivist) which are meaningless...
Acoustics are critical and most people ignore that.
And it’s frustrating that people don’t see this.
Yes.
|
When we study acoustics we begin to understand how the gear pieces together or separately affec sound quality...
it is evident that 100 bucks speakers cannot gave a S.Q. rivalling top speakers...
It is a common place evidence...
My point is nevermind the speakers price , "half" of the soundfield quality will result from speakers/brain/room relation and from our ability or unability to control this relation.
Reviewers are like the consumers to which they adress their opinions : they sell the gear pieces chosen, they dont sell or advertise about the way to control our experience with acoustics...
At best they recommend panels...
Reviewers as consumers are together in the same ignorance pit by the force of their circumstances, they focus on the gear design not acoustics concepts and experiments...
Dont accuse reviewers buy a mirror and confront your ignorance... It is what i have done for myself 8 years ago......
|
It seems nothing will change...
Like a bull blind by rage seeing a red cap and going against it...
My point was not driving people against or for one any reviewer...
my point was that the "scamming" process in audio result from our own ignorance as consumers or as reviewers...
It is all right to pick gear pieces, inform ourselves about it , analysing reviewers takes, thinking about synergy...
But when we had bought the system the real job begin...
This real job is not connecting the system in the wall , judging it, and thinking to the next piece to buy... ( upgrades are not solution in half the case, metaphorically speaking, in half the case it result from our ignorance to use optimally the first piece before buying a second one)
The sound experience we will enjoy with any system at any price do not depend only of the gear system but mainly of the way we will be able to put it at his peak potential S.Q.
With mechanical, electrical, especially acoustical informed controls over our ears/brain/speakers/room relation..
|
I thought i was clear:
I said we scam ourselves first and last... (consumers as reviewers)
By ignorance of acoustics science...
I did not accused as many here the personal character of reviewers into a complotist plot to scam people...
Acoustics ignorance once i had studied it is everywhere not as a complotist perspective from anyone , but by lack of concrete applied knowledge of acoustics concepts...
Reviewers are like the consumers, they ignore acoustics, it is not deliberate, it is a consequence of the universal focus on the gear design by subjectivist as objectivists...
I knew it ONLY by my experience in my room and studying serious audio designer and top scientists as Dr. Gorike , Edgar Choueiri, Floyd Toole... Etc
To be more clear : Most reviewers i read or listened to are sincere and honest ... I am perhaps naive but it is my impression...
"All" reviewers do this? Well, maybe.
I suppose you could be saying a couple of things about gear reviewers:
1. They *intentionally obscure* the larger factor of acoustics so they can more effectively sell or promote equipment.
2. At least some gear reviewers are intentionally obscuring the larger factor but even if it is not intentional, it is the byproduct of this type of review.
I am not sure which one you believe.
Then i concur with your last paragraph opinion :
3. Gear reviewers review gear. People who watch these videos may or may not be informed about the role of gear in acoustics, but their role is narrow and the responsibility for a wider perspective is on the viewer. This is not unlike many other things we read or watch.
|
Thanks for your kind words and understanding...
@mahgister
Room acoustics.
Cutting to the chase after just reading your original post.
The first reply was crass and terribly personal towards you. I have not bothered to read further….the snobbery was unbelievable! 🛁 Rick and his logo impresses me not!
I do not normally get hot under the collar but l felt just cause to post this right back.
Yes you agree that you may not have the big bucks, but you extract and gain the maximum amount of enjoyment from the equipment you have by considering your listening space.
My conclusion to your post and the opinionated rubbish thrown your way is to say:-
Room acoustics do determine the limiting factors of your equipments potential. A really expensive piece of kit will never sound great in a bathroom no matter how good it is. I know that this is an extreme comparison (and rude comments should remain in the bathroom) but some peoples listening rooms with minimalist designs can be the most limiting factor…..arguably more than anything else.
|
I just read in another thread a poster saying he know how to assemble a system without the need of reviewers opinion.
I had no problem with that but i suppose his method is not sniffing the gear but hearing a piece buying it and connecting it. Job done.
I am sorry but i called this consumers ignorance even if you had verified all measures done by an ASR "engineer" or Amir himself...Or reviewers ignorance...A piece of gear exist only playing in a specific system, in a specific room for specific ears/brain... Design techs numbers are there to validate good design process nothing else...
An audio system exist mechanically, electrically and acoustically in a room and psycho-acoustically for specific ears...Not in a showroom, in a showroom there is only piece of gear connected.
Why did Dr. Choueiri measures in a complex way the ears/head of his customers ?
he is an acoustician...
My AKG K340 why are they so good when properly optimized ?
They were designed by an acoustician physicist not a headphone tweaker, Dr. Gorike...
I forgot to say that i takes me many years to learn how to install a system to my convenience, among these 12 years of explorations and experiments, buying, toying reading reviewers and articles, but at the end i missed the target.
I succeeded only after 2 years during retirement reading about acoustics, doing experiments 7 day /7 all day... It was my past hobby : learning acoustics at home...
It is why i can measure my past ignorance when most cannot...
It is why i dont consider that audio knowledge begin and end when someone tried about 400 amplifiers etc...
I doubt Dr. Choueiri or Dr Gorike had accumulated their knowledge by buying gear pieces... Thats my point...
|
I’ll put my point more positively:
Sometimes we benefit from reviewers who translate their experience into tools, techniques, and vocabulary which can help someone who also plans to learn and then listen and experiment for themselves.
We are in agreement about that, I assume.
Well said i agree with your common sense yes...
But my point in this thread as a motive, is that all reviewers, of high end gear or low cost one, minimize or put acoustics knowledge under the rug...
They must sell first, then they must inform about a piece of gear.....They are not there to spoke about acoustics...
When they review gear they do it in the same room they own not in a dedicated room for a specific system...( ASR for example even review speakers borrowing often only one not a pair and they reduce acoustics to some digital measures, and Jay put all speakers in the same acoustic not so well controlled environment)
Then my point is : all reviewers do not help us to inform ourselves about our own basic ignorance...
Anyway most reviewers associated acoustics knowledge in audio to panels, end of story...
As an exemple: if i ask Jay or cheapaudioman
"how did i improve imaging and soundstage in my system with this dac, pre-amp,amp speakers?"
The probability they recommend me a new and better piece of gear is very high?
They probably ignore how to create a good ratio between ASW and LEV, if they even know what these acronyms means ?
Thats my point...
It is not that we are scammed by sellers in audio, we are all scammed by our own ignorance...
Scapegoating someone because he sell low cost Chinese products or because he sell very high end costly product will not change truth and reality...
|
But the idea that we don’t benefit from reviewers is not something I agree with.
I never said that we dont benefit from reviewer...
Who will listen to 400 amplifiers to advise us ? If not Jay...
Who will listen to low cost many pre-amp to recommend one ? not me, but Cheapaudioman...
i appreciate also Huff... Etc I even read ASR...
I bought my last tube pre-amp equalizer thanks to cheapaudioman recommendation and many others ...
My point is : not scapeagoating the reviewers, (who ignore acoustics basic deliberately or not to sell us gear) , but facing our own laziness and ignorance about audio essentials concepts in acoustics as the only to way undertand how to work our system/room...
|
Audiophile market is based on mass ignorance about audio and acoustics, it is not just about good or bad gear design, good or bad pricing...
Be it cheapaudioman selling low cost products or Jay selling very high end products,
they are legitimate reviewers with their style as any others ..
I dont want to criticize them and their character... It is useless and meaningless because we like someone style or not... So what!
But it is impossible to see through our own personal self deception, self scamming so to speak by the power of our ignorance if we do not inform ourselves about acoustics concepts and meanings in direct experiments ( there is very simple one even for a living room )...
It is because people dont do this that they delude themselves by taking the wrong choices for them...
It is not the reviewers the problem but ourselves...I refuse to makes reviewers bad or good one, the scapegoat of our own ignorance..
i know what i spoke about because 12 years ago i was totally ignorant... I am no more... And i dont speak about the useless knowledge of branded names gear various offerings here, useless for everyone save a reviewer because his job is to sell this to you, good or bad... We have only one audio system to work with...At least only one at a time and we must learn how to work with it... 
Once we had understood how to deal with one system at any price, the basic is the same for any other system/room...
|
Now about acoustics...I don’t use a single thing. I treat the room by stuffing it with all sorts of different fabrics/upholstery/furnishings etc.... It sounds good to me, and I can care less if it does not to someone else.
Perfect for you as my room is perfect for me...
Congratulations..
But your feeling does not invalidate my experience with acoustics nor science itself...
Acoustics is the only way to put any system at any price at his working peak potential once we had control over mechanical &electrical problems...
Changing a piece of gear instead of making the system we already own work at his optimal level, before the necessary or unnecessary upgrading will not do much, or as well as we imagine...
No one can know if his room is optimal to serve his system acoustically BEFORE experimenting with all aspect of acoustics... our feeling that all is right has nothing to do with objective experience in changing conditions and changing acoustics parameters..
It is hard to do. We must study, We must have time for many experiments to learn (most of people work and dont have the luxury of time) We must have a room to do it(most people has no dedicated room ).
But the truth must be tell for the sake of it and for the benefit of all...It cost me nothing to do it, it is the good news...
|
How do you get to the bottom of it with cheapaudiomen such as Randy, Mahgister, etc?
I picked Randy not because i approve all of what he said...
I could have pick Jay video reviewing 400 high end top amplifiers in a room empty of any acoustics devices parametrized to serve his choice of gear. When we buy gear we must evaluate it in optimal acoustics conditions designed for the gear we have bought...
If not we will enter in an upgrade cycle because of our incapacity to put the system at his potential peak level... Price has nothing to do with the way to put any system in his optimal settings, it is valid for any system, acoustics principles dont change with price...
My point was about the only scam in audio: Acoustics knowledge put under the rug to sell gear... Costlier gear or cheap gear, that makes no difference for my point...
People focus on Randy character instead of seeing the essential : Jay and Randy at the opposite end of the price stick commit the SAME SIN : Acoustics is ignored completely to sell upgrades...
Acoustics is not about panels it is about hearing parameters and behaviour, complex devices as Helmholtz resonators of various design, very specific concept to create soundfield in our room : ASW (Apparent Source Width) refers to the perceived spatial extent of a sound source and LV (listener envelopment) this factor is highly desirable to set in place correctly because we felt encompassed by the soundfield and included in it. Etc many others concepts exist with which we can play in experiments...
Applying Helmholtz resonators principle as an exemple i just modified the vent hole of my new small active speakers.
(unbeknownst to all Vent hole in small speakers are badly designed for cost saving and esthetical reason, sound quality is secondary here for the company; who would buy a hideous vent hole design with one,2 or 3 feet of tubes of different size outside the small box which cost more ?)
Then these low cost speakers of mine once modified ( which were unanimously well reviewed) i just bought were transformed from mediocre in my opinion to good (acceptable)... Thanks Helmholtz...
The scam in audio is not related to the price we paid for a piece of gear but to our own acoustics ignorance about the way to use the gear( at any price)...
Acoustics do not resume by buying GIK panels ...
|
Thanks for your well articulated explanation...
I think your judgment about his seller strategy is right.
My intention was not mocking him or his strategy choices though but just using his video as a typical reviewer stance forgetting the essentials...(Acoustics many concepts)
i could have pick Jay reviewing high end gear... I already had done it years ago when he was totally oblivious of acoustics... And he is the complete Janus brothers of cheapaudioman... The two sell gear pieces not knowledge... i dont judge them...( i prefer Jay )
My goal in my journey was not buying the best audio system or the cheapest. I simply went along with my budget.
My goal was to learn how to embed rightfully in their three working dimensions any gear system...( mechanical,electrical and acoustical)
Acoustics being by far the most important...Because without acoustics concepts we dont understand what we do in audio at all ...
I think this video, however, is simply a calculated effort to solidify his brand with his target audience by cynically affirming their choices while denigrating choices made by others. His message is that the ones who buy at the lower end, out of choice or necessity, are somehow smarter than those who buy at the higher end because their cheaper system sounds just as good, maybe even better. The message is that if you buy the kind of stuff he reviews you are shrewd, but if you buy stuff above his price segment of equipment, you are a fool.
|
I see what Mahgister was implying. The reviewer is selectively ignorant - like the dog who did not bark in the night?? Or if that isn’t what you mean, it is what I mean.
You got it....
Cheapaudioman is a reviewer and like all reviewer they minimize and erase acoustics knowledge importance to sell the gear...
Pure ignorance and marketing...In cheapaudioman case it is pure ignorance in other case it is bad faith of experienced sellers...
Consumers audiophiles are like a herd they learn by index pointing. They dont study acoustics and at best conflate it with GIK panels....
Ignorant as cheapaudioman most here insult his character without knowing more than him...
And most audiophiles dont know how to listen and hear their own system because there is only one way to know : we must correlate each aspects of what we hear to a specific concept of acoustic, then modifying the Speakers/room parameters to improve the experience... But it is impossible if we have no acoustics concepts at our disposal without studying what it means in a serious books and how can it be implemented in our speakers/room for our ears/brain...
Most throw insults at cheapaudioman. It is unfair and pure stupidity. I never intend to mock him but to use his video as an example of "the dog who dont bark" in audio...
|
I just think he’s ignorant.
I think audioman is ignorant and it is why i posted this video...
But i think all of those attacking his character are as ignorant as he is and miss completely my point about acoustics as most audiophiles and reviewers occupied only by the promotion of their gear against the others by virtue of their "tastes" or pricing...
By the way it takes years and years before Jay who tested 400 hundred top high end amplifier adress the acoustics relation between speakers and room... he did it after many years... at least he spoke about it a bit unlike cheapaudioman...But it say a lot about acoustics complete ignorance in audio. Most think acoustics is room acoustic at best...
Acoustics rule...( not just room acoustic but psycho-acoustics and physical acoustics (Helmholtz resonators etc )
|
Good points!
Thanks for your opinion.
The others seems more busy mocking the character than about thinking...
I will only add that what i means by acoustics knowledge is not just standard room acoustic but more large ... I just bought new speakers i modified with success for my room... Acoustics is way more deep than room acoustic...
WAF... the dog that does bark!
Acoustic treatments are avoided because of room aesthetics. A hard wood floor with no carpet is the worst offense IMO. People who paid for wood floor will NEVER put carpet on it. It will remain acoustically untreatable. Just horrible imo.
Windows are the next problem and have more solutions but the look of the window is far more important and most are very reluctant to cover it.
I've also found people don't like the look any acoustic panels or bass traps on their walls. Most people don't think it makes that much of a difference if any.
They get used to the room acoustic the way it looks best and that's the way it will stay.
|
It seems most people dont get my point about this video and "the dog who did not bark"......
For example the essential is not perceiving a difference in sound in "the same room", anybody can do this at least most...
Acoustics is the art of pairing a specific speakers to a specific room transformed and settle for this specific speakers... Doing that we must use listening skills in relation with specfic acoustics concepts and experiments
This is why gear price has nothing to do with acoustic optimization. And this is why audio is a deceptive hobby because of acoustics ignorance...
Instead of hating cheapaudioman and accusing him to be on the wrong end of the stick of capitalism it is better to think...
The gear price has no relation with the minimal acoustical satisfaction threshold. The gear price and design is linked only to our budget not to acoustics science...Once it is chosen we are free to optimize any gear system...
Any system at any price may sound relatively good when optimized in relation with his specific potential for sure..
My pleasure comes from acoustic balance and knowledge not for being on the upper end of the capitalist end of the stick...it is as pitiful as crying because we are on the lowest end of the capitalist stick...
Acoustics rules audio not money nor snobbery....
Buy more books than gear pieces...
For theoretical Acoustics i recommend "sounds source" of Akpen J. Essien
For practical physical acoustics : Floyd Toole book...
For articles about theoretical acoustics and applied one, Edgar Choueiri is the third genius...
|
Very good posts... Thanks Bolong and gdaddy1
But you miss or forget the "dog which did not barked" in the audio conditioning market...
|
He sounds like a hater and can’t afford any better then a Wiim mini.
I cannot afford costly piece but i am not a "hater" either nor a "snobber"... are you a snobber ?
Why accusing people you dont know ?
My point about acoustics as OP of this thread is the subject, you seems to have missed it ? I did not post this for the sake of cheapaudioman arguments but for what Sherlock Holmes called "the dog which did not barked".
Acoustics basics, not merely room acoustic panels by the way, is the ignored dog which did not bark in audio, for reviewers as for consumers hypnotized by gear design and prices...
This is my point, acoustics general ignorance, and the focus on price high or low and on design of gear, and this is more important than all cheapaudioman points, which point he did not even think about one second in his video as yourself by the way too much occupied by the character and in the hurry to "hate" the "hater" ...
|
