The Difficulties in Component "Shootouts"


First of all, I hate doing component "shootouts" or "this vs. thats" as if it’s a wrestling match. I find it tiresome and generally unenjoyable. That said, I purchased an Oppo 205 a couple months back and I’ve been really enjoying it, especially with my Oppo PM3 phones, now that it’s a bit broken in. But last night I broke my rules and decided to compare it directly to my EAR Acute CD player, which costs about 5x as much. OK, first of all, it’s impossible to do a realistic test at home because it can’t be a blind test, I’m using different interconnects and power cords, although of equal quality and I’m comparing CD to SACD, which may not even be the same mix. So that said, I was still curious. So I decided to use the Opus3 disc and the first track is "I can’t get started" that features a very realistic live performance on tenor sax. So I listen on the EAR and it’s pretty great. The tenor sax is up front, very live sounding with a lot of air and space. On the Oppo, even with SACD, the space around the instruments is not there and the horn sounds more honky and kazoo-like. But that’s not the point. The point is this - as I listen more to the Oppo, it starts sounding just fine. Nothing seems missing and I think that’s because the human ear has a way of filling in the missing pieces when we listen to music. That’s why I can listen to a Beethoven symphony on my Tivoli table radio with a 3" speaker and find it totally enjoyable. The brain completes the sonic picture that is lacking in the source. After a few back and forths, my ear became more and more desensitized and the whole experience just became boring and meaningless. So look - if shootouts are your cup of tea, go ahead by all means. It’s not my place to criticize how someone should enjoy his bought and paid for property, but I would much rather just sit back and listen at this stage of the game.  I'll leave that to BO1972, who appears to enjoy them very much. 
chayro

Showing 1 response by steakster

Many years ago, I participated in a very comprehensive study by Eastman Kodak. Professional filmmakers (cinematographers, producers,directors, editors, etc) were invited to a 2 day screening for comparing different motion picture film stocks. The control was rigorous. The same scene with the same lighting was shot using the same camera with the same lens. The footage was projected by the same projector on the same screen.

It was extremely easy to tell the difference in sharpness, grain structure, color palette, gamma, etc. There was much discussion of how a film stock can be used creatively for the ’visual style’ or ’look’. Yet, there was a general consensus that within a few minutes of viewing, it didn’t matter. Our brains simply accepted that the content was being told in this manner. The content became more important than the mode of the delivery.