The dangerous world of Reel-to-Reel Tape


It feels like I re-entered the world of tape knowing full well of all the downsides, yet I  did it anyway.  I spent much of my youth glued to my dad's decks, making recordings.  As cassette and digital came of age, I always appreciated the sound of tape. 

Whether this adventure is worth it is a subjective exercise.  For folks who plop down $500-$1k on cables or those who swap gear often, tape is really not that expensive, relatively speaking.  Titles are limited though. 

The sound quality and experience is quite something.  Before jumping back into R2R, I had 4 versions of Muddy Waters' Folksinger.  Hearing Chad Kasem's firm's work on it in 15ips it's just something else.  Body, size, and presence are just different than very good vinyl and digital.  And this is with the stock reproduce board from a Revox PR99 MKIII. I can only imagine what's going to happen when I rebuild that card, put in a modern one, or run directly from the head out to a preamp. 

Maybe I'll see some of you in R2R Rehab, where I'll try to get sober from tape. 

128x128jbhiller

Showing 1 response by lhasaguy

50 years ago I was into R2R and the first thing I did with all my albums was record them at 15 IPS from the new vinyl.  At that point I had complete collections of the Stones, Les Zeppelin, Bob Dylan, The Allman Brothers and more.  Then I got into 4 Channel but was limited to buying prerecorded material.

It was quite the journey, but life intervened and divorce dismantled my system and my musical world at that time.  The only downside as I recall was the inability to quickly find a specific track and switch and what I wanted to hear.  It was terrific at putting on music that lasted longer than one side of an album.

I miss it, but time has not been kind to the genre.  I hope enough people get into R2R so that it can make a comeback where more choices are available for those who have discovered its merits and understand the shortcomings.