The Allure of Vintage Audio Gear

I had a Heybrook TT2 with an Alphason HRS100 MCS tonearm and external power supply . Compared it side by side with new TT s above 5k$ and it beat them hands down. Was still going fine since 1985 until I sold it recently. Talk about value for the money.

I have both and I really love vintage gear, the restoration process, the sound, the look, collecting etc. I can be very rewarding and expensive, like vintage automobiles. I have 3 vintage systems, and the one piece I could swap out and use in my main modern system is my McIntosh Mx110z. Although it doesn’t have the inputs and features of my C2300 preamp, the sound is amazing, and an FM tuner as a bonus. I realize this is not for everyone but it is a very enjoyable aspect of this hobby for me.

I've been in this hobby for more than fifty years and have owned quite a bit of Hi-Fi gear;  both solid state and tube.  Solid state gear has come along way from the late 1960's when its sound was one dimensional and flat.  Gone was the bloom of tube gear.  Today both technologies are well implemented.  As for vintage gear I have owned quite a bit over the years but have only kept a few pieces that I really enjoy.  My 1962 Macintosh MR65B was the first tube stereo tuner manufactured by the company and my Dad's old Dynakit Stereo 70 that he built with the help of my Mom back in 1961. Dad was color blind, so Mom organized all the color coded parts for him so he knew where they went during the assembly.  lol

There's nothing like a well sorted piece of tube vintage gear to bring out the enjoyment of your favorite music. 😊

Vintage is nostalgia. It sounded good when it came out. Today's advance in technology has greatly surpassed anything vintage. I got rid of my last 70s vintage Marantz in the 80s. Looking forward ever since.

Given most of our ages on this forum, most of us started out with today's 'vintage' equipment.

Like most things, if you owned top of the line equipment from the better known companies, your equipment sounded good and would sound at least decent by today's standards.  For those of us that didn't own TOTL equipment, what we did own sounded fine, until you heard something that sounded appreciably better.

The big difference back then was attitudinal.  The tendency was to use what you had until it fell apart or became too expensive to repair.  Lots of reasons for this, including strict enforcement of MSRP in the 60's & 70's by dealers and manufacturers.

With the 80's came stores that offered discounts like Tech Hi Fi and Crazy Eddie's and so, buying new components became more common.

For myself, I started out with a used Philco/ Voice of Music suitcase style system (tubes) that lasted 5 years until I purchased a SONY HP 161 compact phono system (solid state) that got me through college to when I purchased a Pioneer 636 / EPI 100/ Dual 1228 set-up (solid state).

Sound quality wise, it sounded fine.  On rare occasions, I thought it sounded excellent.  But there were limitations that I would just look past.  I could only get so excited when listening to the music.  

Things changed when I started to spend more and went with separates (ADCOM) and better speakers (KEF Q55).

About 20 years back, I went through a vintage phase and refurbished two Marantz receivers (2216 and 2240).   Expensive proposition.  I had genuinely lusted for the Marantz receivers as a teenager.  Bit of a let down ultimately.  Very warm sounding, hit all the nostalgic notes, enjoyable, but they did not match up to the more modern components I had.  Used one of the receivers as a tuner in my main system, where it really shone nicely.  Now, if only there were decent FM stations to listen to.  The other receiver I gifted to Les Paul, who was a Marantz collector himself.  

I do love the look of vintage equipment and every so often, I get tempted to chase something, but I stop myself because better sounding components are out there for the same money as tracking a vintage piece down and restoring it.  There's also less vintage equipment (60's & 70's) out there.