System versus live


To sound live, I have tried, in building my system, to get so many things correct. Dynamic range, Prat, Tone, Coherence, Body, Weight, Visceral momentum, Spatial perspective, etc. I remember being on a ferry ride, listening to a small ensemble, amazed at the beauty and artistry of the musicianship, along with the proper "air" of how the notes started and stopped, and being so engulfed in the performance. I have been on and near performers on stage, with the same amazement. My system touches on all of these things, but it is not "live". Before the system, room and listening position, one must consider the recording itself. Microphones, mic preamps, console faders, acoustics used for the recording, and a whole lot more. Then we have the monitors used for the final product(headphones or speakers) and the engineer(s) who put it together. Then, it is transferred and transferred again. Labels such as Mapleshade and Sheffield Labs(I just happen to have many)go to great lengths to minimize the "electronics", as well as some other aspects, of their recordings, to sound live and pure. Being a member of Audiogon, as well as some other forums, and, being a devoted audiophile, music listener, consultant and above all else, a human being, I ask this question. How "live" do you think your system really is ?
mrdecibel

Showing 3 responses by sogood51

Probably a good test would be someone like Patricia Barber. Her recordings are very well recorded, and she performs at the Green Mill Lounge in Chicago often.

Huge concert hall stuff just does not down size.

Dave
Not even close....but then, I wouldn't want "live" in my living room even if I could have it.

Most audiophiles like little baby images anyway...yes?.......little drum sets and all that.

Dave
Mceljo

Yes, a very small recreation is very possible. A single artist (maybe two).

I think VMPS does this at all the shows for the last few years....although their show room is "much" larger than almost all home audio rooms would be.

Dave