Step Up Transformers….Are they Worth the Trouble?


Some of you may aware of my Garrard 301 project, it’s now very close to completion. The plinth finally shipped from Hungry after 3 months of long wait.

Given my last experience with Hana Umami Red, I would like to take things to the next level. Which brings me to mating low output cart with a SUT. Every review I’ve read so far suggests when the SUT-MC match is right, the end result is heavenly. The bass is right, the midrange is clear, and most importantly, the highs are relaxed and extended—not rolled off.

I am not saying you can’t get great sound without a SUT but it appears with a properly matched SUT, sound can be quite magical.

Thought this would be the right time to get input from experienced users here since I am still contemplating my cartridge and outboard phonostage options.

My preference would be to go with a tube phono…I kinda miss tinkering with tubes :-)

My system, Garrard 301 (fully refurbished), Reed 3P tonearm, Accuphase E-650 with built-in AD50 analog board ➡️ Tannoy Canterbury’s.

Cart and phono under consideration through my dealer,

Fuuga - Output : 0.35 mVrms | Impedance : 2.5 Ω (1kHz)

Phonostage - Tron Convergence and Konus Audio Phono Series 1000

The cart - MC combination, I am lusting after is Etsuro Urushi Bordeaux MC with their Etsuro Transformer.
https://www.etsurojapan.com/product/bordeaux

The other transformer is EMIA, cooper or silver version.

Your input is appreciated!

lalitk

Showing 6 responses by dover

You have to know that the Denon AU-1000 weigths 12kg. ( not lbs. 

What a hoot laugh

Of course most of the 12kg is actually the gunmetal casing.

The actual transformers are a fraction of this in weight.

There's a sucker born every day.

Several audiophiles on this " SUT's party " have any idea what I'm talking about when theyare so happy with those SUT they own that does not permits that the cartridge can shows at its best.

That's correct.

MC Step Up transformers are like candy - what flavour do you prefer.

They are not linear.

They have phase shifts.

The variations with different cartridges goes well beyond loading  (input impedance) and gain.

If you talk to cartridge designers like JCarr you will find that different core structures as well as materials mate better with some MC's and not others, even if they have the same internal impedance and output. For example - with some cartridges a toroidal MC Step Up may be preferable due to the design of the MC.

For the end user they are a crap shoot. For every cartridge you buy you would need to buy dozens of transformers to trial and find the best.

Price is no indicator and "specs" are not always an indicator as to which is best.

But at the end of the day you can't avoid the shortfalls - distortion, phase shifts.

As I said above MC Step Ups are candy, they provide a rose tinted view of the world. I have a draw full of some of the most highly regarded MC Step Up's - I don't use any.

In the vintage years Tamura and Altec were the best transformers as a line models. Some of them silver wired.

And there are a few others. I have some vintage Altec's from the 50's that have individually annealed layers within the core - that is each layer of the laminated core has a specific annealing process that is different for each layer. Those Altec transformers also have teflon inserted between the windings. There are no transformers today that approach the level of intricacy within these vintage transformers were built and wound. Altec for example I believe had some 200 staff working specifically on transformer R&D, development and testing in the early years. No manufacturer could carry that cost today.

 

 

You can buy SUT with a phase equalizer option.

@lalitk 

Can you give me an example.

Are you sure you are not talking about running a zoebel network as recommended by Jensen - this is designed to minimise ringing and distortion inherent in the transformer.

If you own the cartridge body then the best is to fix it with boron cantilever and MR stylus tip and not SAS boron.

The Jico Boron/SAS is a boron cantilever with a microridge profile stylus  - is there something I'm missing here ?

 

Jico SAS above - see the ridge around the top - some call it a micro ridge.

Others call. it a microscanner.

Have a closer look at the bottom right hand of your diagram "contact with records" there is a ridge at the bottom of the stylus.

Steve Gutenberg recently reviewed a new Zesto Tube Phone Preamp, but he intentionally chose the MM one not the more expensive MM/MC one, but instead used, you guessed it, SUTs with it. 
 

The more expensive Zesto phonos use a SUT internally with the internal MM phono section. They use Jensen transformers.

The likely reason he chose the MM only phono is so that he can use his own choice of SUT.