Hi Isgau8.I am a former dunlavy 4 owner and I can tell you it would be very hard to beat the dunlavy within the price range..however I get to listen to my friend tyler acoustic woodmeers and was very impressed,but those are not small either..sorry..
Speaker replacement advice
Hello all. I am presently considering selling a pair of Dunlavy SC-Vs that I have owned for 2 years. I love the Vs but wish to consolidate to one system as I have 2 in different rooms of the house. Unfortunately, the Vs are not aesthetically suited for the new room in question. For those of you out there who are familiar with/heard Dunlavy speakers, I am hoping that you may be able to give some suggestions as to what I may consider that will perform as the large Dunlay line and not be as big.
Thanks,
IAN
Thanks,
IAN
4 responses Add your response
SC-V's were a popular mastering monitor. You might want to check out this review >http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_highend_studio_monitor/index.html To summarize, the review says ATC 300's have an advantage in dynamics and SPL levels; rockers liked ATC's more. The review gave DAL SC-V the edge with classical engineers/listeners. Both are highly regarded for studio monitoring. This is only a suggestion, but a smaller ATC, such as the tower version of the 50's, might fit your new room much better and still keep up with what you are used to from DAL SC-V's (accuracy, dynamics and volume levels) although you may lose some of the ultra LF. It might be worth a listening session to compare. Another possibility might be PMC's. I think you will get more bass extension from the TL design than ATC's. You might find this to be closer to DAL SC-V's in the ultra LF bass...then again you may like the tighter less bass heavy ATC's...all a matter of taste. |
