Speaker Cable upgrade


I would like to upgrade my speaker cable, I current used AQ clear3, how about AQ Dragon(used), or can anybody give me some others comments Iwould appreciate
kentt

Showing 4 responses by redkiwi

Thanks Gerrym5. I am a slow learner, but recognise good advice when I see it.
It depends on what the rest of your system is and what you want to accomplish. If your interconnects are all Audioquest, then stick to Audioquest speaker cables. It is vital that you do not mix manufacturers - unless of course you like playing around with tone controls. Cable manufacturers play with a whole variety of factors to voice their cables as a total cable system. If you mix and match then the chances of success are very low. Secondly you should make sure the interconnects and speaker cables are from roughly the same level - ie. mix Dragons with Diamonds or Lapis. Personally, although Audioquest obviously makes good cables, I believe better bargains can be found elsewhere - no doubt a function of Audioquest having to cover its high promotion and advertising cost. For my money - I want cables that do not impose any sound on the equipment. That may sound like an unattainable ideal, but after trying and living with many different cables I came across the Wireworld range and.. I use the Wireworld Eclipse cables and find them utterly neutral, natural and even-handed. The whole philosophy of Wireworld is to make cables that are soundless - illustrated by their marketing of an interconnect comparator which allows you to hear the difference between any interconnect and "no interconnect". So my first instinct is to recommend Wireworld to you. One final note - I have never regretted over-spending on speaker cable - it just seems to be a link that does not suffer from diminishing returns until your cables cost nearly half the price of your speakers (not that I recommend this)!
Interesting opinions Carl - I guess you must have needed the wash. Your assumption that I get my opinions from dealers is unwarranted - I cannot think of a less likely source of useful information, but just because even dealers say it does not make it hogwash. I do not think I would be the first person to suggest that mixing and matching manufacturers just increases the number of variables, and reduces the chance of a synergistic result. But despite being the sort that loves to challenge conventional wisdom, I still came to the conclusion that fewer variables were better. Did I get there listening to dealers? No. Just 20 odd years of experience - starting out by mixing everything up - finding that a significant downside of this was that every upgrade resulted in having to shuffle the variables (expensively) all over again - and slowly but surely finding a state of grace was to be had by keeping it simple. You are right that I should not have said "vital". I just find it better to see the cables as a single item and use one manufacturer; I find it better to not mix manufacturer when mating a transport to a dac etc. This is because I have found that to get a synergistic result does not require the use of say 13 variables (count them - transport, dac, pre, power, speaker, digital link, 2 interconnect links, speaker cable, and 4 power cords). Instead, 5 or 6 variables will do just fine. If there is any hogwash here it is the use of pseudo-science to dismiss a product (as you did with Wireworld cables) by pointing out a design issue you happen to disagree with (in this case the coating of strands) and concluding the cable must therefore smear detail and be inferior to anything that does not coat strands. If you hear the Wireworld cables smearing details then say so. What more proof do you need? Similarly with your comparison with Cardas - they must be better because the strand thickness is varied? Truly hogwash Carl. Personally I found when placing Cardas Golden Cross throughout my system, in place of Wireworld Gold Eclipse, I did not like the result. It warmed things up a lot, but the effect was unnecessary and detracted from the music by introducing a pervasive coloration. There were other differences, but the simple fact was that with the Wireworld in place I enjoyed the music better. I do not have to justify or explain this with pseudo-science. Of course valuable knowledge can be gained from understanding cause and effect - but I cannot believe your explanations of the Wireworld or Cardas cables are sufficient to either dismiss the Wireworld cables (as you do) or prove the Cardas cables are better (as you claim).
Thanks Yuri. But I was really just feeling mischievous that day and was trying to wind Carl up. I was somewhat disappointed when he did not reply, but sure enough he came through in the end. As usual he substituted invective (now I am an ignoramus) for any semblance of reasoned argument, and continued to make assumptions about me (he can hear better than me and is more open-minded on cable mixing than me). And all this angst is meant to prove his opinions are truth, and others' (in this case mine) are not. Actually Carl I was not offended. I enjoyed every word. I am in two minds whether your latest arguments (accusations) require rebuttal, but don't want this little spat of ours to become tedious for others - so I will withdraw now and let others decide for themselves. My apologies to Kentt for having fun and messing around with your serious question.