the 'cool' factor is unquestionably with the electa amator. the really nice ones are becoming rare (nobody wants to part with them) and they sound incredible . if those qualities mean nothing, the auditor is the choice.
Sonus Faber Electa Amator mk I vs Auditor M
My system consits of the following:
Digital frontend: Meridian 500,Meridian 518,meridian 566.24
Analog: Transrotor ZET I, Grado ref wood cartridge
Amplification: Spectral DMA90 & Spectral DMC20 II
Signal Cabling: MIT
Mains cabling: Furutech incl mains filter
Loudspekers: Sonus Faber Electa Amator mk I
I'm planning to upgrade my speakers to the new auditor M series.
Is there anyone who can comment what improvemenst to expect?? (if any...)
The Electa Amator is an excellend musical loudspeaker that I've enyojed for many many years but perhaps not the most subtle and transparent speaker around. Even driven by spectral.
With Auditor M I'm expecting more transparency, speed and agilty while hopefuly musical at the same time.
Any comment welcome....
Digital frontend: Meridian 500,Meridian 518,meridian 566.24
Analog: Transrotor ZET I, Grado ref wood cartridge
Amplification: Spectral DMA90 & Spectral DMC20 II
Signal Cabling: MIT
Mains cabling: Furutech incl mains filter
Loudspekers: Sonus Faber Electa Amator mk I
I'm planning to upgrade my speakers to the new auditor M series.
Is there anyone who can comment what improvemenst to expect?? (if any...)
The Electa Amator is an excellend musical loudspeaker that I've enyojed for many many years but perhaps not the most subtle and transparent speaker around. Even driven by spectral.
With Auditor M I'm expecting more transparency, speed and agilty while hopefuly musical at the same time.
Any comment welcome....
10 responses Add your response