I noticed minimal to no difference running the ST 100 in triode with my Harbeth speakers. seems to be mirrored by other Stereo 100 users.
Stick to ultralinear.
I've tried the Apollos in triode, they still have plenty of power that way (150 Watts into my 96dB speakers) but the sonics just don't do it for me. I prefer ultralinear every time. The triode mode gains you like 1% worth of a sweeter midrange, at the expense of significant bass power, slam, and dynamics. IMO the Rogue amps sound like they're supposed to in ultralinear. If you want a super sweet lush tube amp, these aren't that. And no, you definitely should NOT use KT150 in any Rogue amps. Even in amps that can use them (like my VACs) I think they will not sound good unless the amp was designed specifically for that tube. They sounded bad in my VACs.
|
I had an original Atlas and compared it to a Stereo 90 in my system, long ago. Yeah, the ST90 was definitely better (I later upgraded to Apollos). So I agree with @avanti1960 - you should probably just stretch to the Stereo 100. |
@avanti1960, + 1 |
I owned the Rogue Cronus Magnum II for several years (Atlas amp section). Then I upgraded to a Rogue pre and Stereo 100 amp. The Stereo 100 felt and sounded like twice the amp of the Atlas regardless of wattage spec. Sounded on par with my Parasound a21+ but better overall refinement, transparency and sound stage. The ST100 is a world beater for the money. Answer- the S |
The Rogue amps perform really well from their 4 ohm taps into 8 ohm nominal speakers, so a 3 ohm dip shouldn’t be any problem when running from those taps. But the Stereo 100 should perform better overall, if you can go there. 100 Watts, even sacrificing a little of that for running 4 ohm taps into 8 ohms (this mismatch will generally sacrifice some power in exchange for lower distortion and better bass), should be enough for you 93dB speakers. |