2. amps-preamps
  3. 168738-93954

replace Mcintosh with Luxman

I am about to sell my Mcintosh 611s and replace with 2 Luxman c900u.. I live in Alaska, outside of Anchorage, and there is no retail sales of mid to high end gear in this state.  No opportunity to listen to amps before I purchase unless I travel to lower 48.  Anybody have an opinion on going from Mcintosh to Luxman.

Thanks  
guyt

Showing 3 responses by erik_squires

erik_squires
15,861 posts
 

The minute I made the switch to the Luxman I heard a boost in bass.  

 

In terms of solid state, I can't argue with you, especially the extension and control in the bass.  Maybe this is why I'm less interested in a sub for music?  While the mid and treble are very liquid and smooth I can also see where a real tube-phile would still stick to tubes.

If I had spare cash I'd probably really like trying the Luxman tube integrateds for a while too.

erik_squires
15,861 posts
 
For those interested I decided to go for the Luxman amps(2)  In regards to the Mcintosh I found them to be almost painfully bright sounding in the higher frequencies.

You absolutely will love, love, love Luxman.
erik_squires
15,861 posts
 
I think it would absolutely be the right way to go for me. :)

However, if you are happy with the Mc sound especially in the high frequencies you may find the Luxman to be warm by comparison.

Luxman's are neutral, extended, and have a magical midrange.
More to discover