Proac 3.8 or Sonus Faber Cremona

Caro .pt

Ouvi ambas na Delmax. Com amplificação krell. As Proac, como seria de esperar, soaram um pouco clínicas por comparação com as Cremona. Tecnicamente, nada a apontar. Apenas se revelaram (as Proac) menos capazes de envolver o ouvinte. São, na realidade, dois mundos diferentes.

Lisbon

Go with the subwoofer approach. If you love your monitors and want more bottom end definetion and full range sound, doing a pair of subs like the Vandy 2wq's or Revel B15's is the way to go. The Revel B15 is probably the absolute best musical subwoofer on the market(and also the absolute most flexible too as it has unlimited room contour ability along with every input/output you would ever need) at ANY price, the Vandy is great for half the price.

I recently sold my ProAc 3.8s as I am planning on upgrading to the new ProAc D80. I listened to to the Sonus Farber Cremona today at a local store and was simply blown away with their smooth life like sound. I can't say that they are better than my ProAc 3.8s were but they are extremely musical (and this with with a Plinus SS integrated amp). I do prefer tubes however and used an ARC VT-100MKII with my 3.8s. The Cremona has spiked my interest to the point that my local dealer is going to let my take a pair home for a week for audition in my system.

I think Fletcher-Munson has a role in what you're experiencing. Other than a separate subwoofer, as Aniwolfe suggested, allowing you to control the bass volume separately, or a tone control, I don't see a solution.

I also hazard to guess that the one thing that we rarely do, but should, when auditioning speakers is turn the volume down. Many speakers have a tendency to sound balanced at a certain volume "sweet spot" but colored at lower or higher volumes. Try it when auditioning your replacements.

Good luck.

I would recommend a musical sub like REL or Vandersteen if everything is great except for the bass ouptput at lower volumes. The vandersteen 2wq sure helps me with my PROAC 1.5's at lower listen levels and even higher ones.

The principal problem its a lack of bass output efficiency.
Another problem it's when i'm listening to the system during night and i can't go to high in volume then the sound looses only bass output.

The Concentra and the Proac 2.5's or D15's sound great together. But it might help if you share why you want to change speakers. What are you looking for that you don't get with the EAII (which BTW,I also love with the Concentra)?

I used the 3.8 with ARC VT100 MkIII and loved the result. I ultimately traded them because they don't really open up at apartment listening levels (i.e. they need to be "cranked" before sounding balanced). Their bi-wireing scheme was also not to my liking in that one set of binding posts feed ONLY the tweeter -the other feeds midrange and woofer. I'm used to a tweet-mid on one post and woofer on the other. If these traits aren't a concern, they are great speakers!

I'm using the Concentra II with ProAc D15 and have to agree with Keithr on the synergy of the two.

The newer Proac's have a downward firing bass output which makes positioning less of a headache.

Here's what they say on the website.

"Bass loading is achieved through a system which has never been used before in a Response range model. Four large conical feet support each cabinet, allowing the flared equalised ports to couple the bass output efficiently to the floor through the plinths. As a result this driver excels in areas of control, power handling, openness and midrange detail"

I have the 3.8's and wouldn't consider anything else. I do run tubes.

I've heard ProAc 2.5s and Future .5s sound wonderful with Rowland. I would take the ProAcs based on synergy...the SFs really prefer tubes

BTW, there is a new ProAc D38 being released you may want to wait for...