Power cable dilemma


I have to ask the community for an explanation to account for an issue I encountered this past week. 
 

I received a Mark Levinson ML-23.5 amp this past week. I plugged it in with a high end power cord I purchased years ago (because it looked better than the cheap cord that came with the unit. Lol). I switched from an ML-9 so I had certain expectation of the sound. After listening for about 30 minutes, I noticed that the amp did not sound very dynamic. I got up to go feel how hot it was and the heat sinks were barely warm. I turned up the volume and listened for another 15-20 minutes. I got up to check the temperature and the heat sinks were still barely warm. Also, I was playing the amp at volume level 28 on my Cambridge 851N. That is pretty high. The sound was still lifeless. I shut everything down and just sat there, dejected. Was the amp defective? Was it just a bad match? Were my expectations too high? I don’t know what made me try it, but I swapped out the power cord with a plain black cord and powered up the system. Unreal. I was now listening at volume level 22 to the same song, with staggering dynamic impact, at what seemed to be a similar volume. Furthermore, after about 20 minutes, I went up to feel the amp and the heat sinks were very toasty! So the question is: what could have possibly been wrong with the original cord that would result in lower volumes and no heat buildup? It is like it was throttling the current. To me, a cord either connects or it doesn’t. It works or it doesn’t. There should not be an in between. Does anyone have an explanation for this?

jrimer

Showing 2 responses by carlsbad

So cable deniers don't believe you need a heavy gauge power cord.  I am a "cable denier" of sorts in that I think that 99% if not more of the gain available in a cable can be achieved with an inexpensive but heavy gauge cable.   

You have described the exact symptoms of too light a power cable.  

I'll tell a quick story. In my tube amp journey I wanted to try a Decware amp.  There is a 2 year wait list for decware so I started looking on the preowned market.  Being an early riser, I found one listed late saturday night and bought it at 0400 Sunday morning.  It was an unpretentious and relatively inexpensive SET.  It was only 6 wpc (SE34I.5 for those curious).  When the ap arrived there was a note with it "I have included an upgraded power cord I bought for this amp".  It was obviously very light.  I looked it up, it was only 16 awg and cost $300.  This guy had "upgraded" his power cord and ruined the sound from his amp. I was very fortunate to benefit from his misfortune. this amp excells and I eventually upgraded to a top end Decware amp.

As a physicist, I see many examples of google educated scientiists missing the mark and shooting themselves in the foot.  Most tube amps are a 200 watt load or less.  Look at the book and you'll see that 16 awg is plenty for a 200 watt load.  (I think that amp was closer to 100 watts),  But dynamics and base require the ability to supply very high currents for very short times.  Overall it averages out to 100 to 200 watts, but for short times much higher current is required.

Jerry

Yesterday a guy on another forum thought I was arguing with him but as a physicist I was just explaining to him why he was wrong.   

He told me his 14 awg cable was plenty good for any amp up to  2400 watts became that is what the code says. (20 amps).   Since he worked in a hospital, he felt he was an expert and that "hospital grade" was a great upgrade.  I told him that I fully understood his misconceptions and wished him luck.

He asked me if the dynamics and bass that I said he would be missing would be coming in through his house power.....

I challenged him since he believed all he needed was the ampacity in his power cord to run his nameplate current that he should run his amp with a 26 awg power cable.  the boilerplate ampacity of 26 awg is 2.2 amps.  At 120V that is 260 watts.  His amplifier is 200 watts.  He didn't have an explanation why he didn't think 26 awg would be ok, even though his logic said that is 14 awg was good for 2400 watts.

This is the kind of guy who sells a good amp next year because it doesn't have good bass and dynamics.  

Jerry