@uberwaltz,I brought up the opinions of Pass and Modjeski regarding fuses only as an intellectual exercise, for the sake of discussion. I like to hear opposing opinions on subjects, and don’t necessarily have to agree with one I cite (some consider that a cop-out. I don’t.).
I find it interesting when a designer who doesn’t "believe" in the audible superiority of certain boutique parts in all applications produces a product found to provide higher sound quality than those of a designer who does. Is that superior sq the result of design knowledge and wisdom, or merely a happy accident? I mean, if, say, Roger (or Nelson, or anyone else you care to name) can’t hear the difference between garden-variety and "audiophile" fuses, is the superior sound quality of his products achieved because he knows what good sound is---and what design choices lead to that superiority, or in spite of not knowing what doesn’t?
I myself have no opinion on the audibility of fuses (the used ARC PH3 I bought came with both a stock fuse and a Tuning Fuse, but I never A/B’ed them---I didn’t have the PH3 for very long), but do heed Modjeski’s warning about using the Tuning Fuse in a tube power amp. By the way, when I had Ric Schultz (of Electronic Visionary Systems, or EVS) modify my Audible Illusions Modulus 2 pre-amp into a phono-only RIAA amp, I took him up on his offer to bypass the fuse, a thought that now horrifies me!
Here is something I found interesting (hope you do too ;-): In a discussion on his Music Reference AudioCircle Forum on the subject of bass traps, Modjeski stated he was perplexed as to why anyone would spend money on subs, then spend more on bass traps to get rid of the bass they produce. In a flash, I realized that in spite of his vast knowledge of amplifier design, vacuum tubes, and many other hi-fi matters, Roger was not well-versed in matters concerning room acoustics. Bass traps are used not to suck up the bass produced by subs (or woofers in general), but rather the standing waves created by listening room dimensions (modes).
I do admit that when it is said a fuse changed the perceived tonal balance or other timbre-related issue, I find that claim extremely unlikely, if not impossible. How could a fuse possibly be frequency-related (other than 60Hz, etc.)? That just completely defies common sense and rationality. I also consider a fuse in an AC signal to obviously be bi-directional. How could it not be?!