Ortofon SPU, cased or nude?

There are other almost pure analog forums where you might find the experience you are looking for. I am a little surprised no one here has said anything. I know nothing about the cartridge you want to try except that the Ortofon SPUs had their own shells. Are you going to try the "naked" oned or the mounted one?

I was looking to try the naked ones, if there is no performance deficit, as they are quite a lot cheaper.

The SPU G shell carts get much of the effective mass they need from the integrated headshell. They weigh around 30g dependant on model. The naked N-series carts still need that mass so you'll need a very heavy headshell/tonearm combination to get the best out of it.

As an Ortofon dealer, we have enjoyed the opportunity extensively tested most of the SPU cartridges. Lencotweaker nailed it - the SPU A/G/N cartridges all sound different. There is actually a lot of technology in the headshells for the G series, which accounts for the cost difference.

Also, the G and N series cartridges with similar names do exactly correspond - the G series has some newer technology and designs.

In general, I would say that, like for like, the G series sounds more "SPU-ish" than the Ns, the latter which I would categorize as more neutral and less full and lush sounding.

The key to selecting an SPU cartridge is NOT to choose based on price, but to evaluate your LPs by genre and style (early 50s mono jazz vs. early 80s stereo hard rock and select based on the most appropriate SPU stylus type.

If you were looking for one cartridge to start off with, and if you have the right tonearm, I would recommend the SPU Classic GM E MkII as a great entry into the SPU system, for a reasonable price.

That is very helpful indeed. Thanks all of you