I have a 34 which was upgraded to 2400. I think the main difference between mine and a new 2400 has to do with front displays and automatic signal selection.
I think the main difference between the 34 and the 2400 is that the 2400 is full 24/96, with upsampling. I'm not really sure what the original 34 was.
I have not compared the 2400 to other top DACs. All I know is that it stands up well against my Basis 2500/Graham Nightingale/Rowland Cadence front end, and leaves me no desire to upgrade to SACD while the format's future is so uncertain.
I kink of laugh ever time I hear someone say that redbook CD is not a good high end medium. They cannot possibly have ever heard an Audiologic 2400, because the music it can produce from a well recorded CD is stunning.
I think the main difference between the 34 and the 2400 is that the 2400 is full 24/96, with upsampling. I'm not really sure what the original 34 was.
I have not compared the 2400 to other top DACs. All I know is that it stands up well against my Basis 2500/Graham Nightingale/Rowland Cadence front end, and leaves me no desire to upgrade to SACD while the format's future is so uncertain.
I kink of laugh ever time I hear someone say that redbook CD is not a good high end medium. They cannot possibly have ever heard an Audiologic 2400, because the music it can produce from a well recorded CD is stunning.