One turntable with two arms, or two turntables with one each - which would you prefer?


Which would you prefer, if budget allowed: one turntable with two tonearms or two turntables with one each? What would your decision criteria be?

And the corollary: one phono preamp with multiple inputs or two phono preamps?

Assume a fixed budget, but for the purposes of this question, the budget is up to the responder. Admittedly for this type of setup, there will be a sizeable investment once all components of the chain are factored in.

I'm curious to hear how people would decide for themselves the answer to this question. Or maybe you've already made this decision - what do you like about your decision or what would you differently next time?

Cheers.

dullgrin

Showing 1 response by newbee

I tried to cheap out - one table, one arm, and multiple head shells with different cartridges. Problem was there was too much adjustment in fine tuning each set up when you changed head shell/cartridge. Next came a turntable and two tone arms. A much more elegant and much more simple to operate and still get good results. Problem was that limited options for turntables which you could set up for two arms

Ultimately the best and easiest to set up and manage was using two tables. One was quartz locked with a MM cartridge, the other was a belt driven with a MC cartridge. I used only one preamp which allowed two turntables and had impedance selection controls to match cartridge selection (A now old ARC). If I were to do this again today I would do the two tables first if for no other reason than for the reduction of angst involved in getting the best SQ out of a multipurpose set up involving only one table.

So I guess I would look in a mirror and ask myself ’how much do I really want the best SQ or am I willing to sacrifice a bit of SQ for the convenience of use, or for sure, the expense. Big bunch of tradeoff’s. Your call.