cleeds bloviates:
No cleeds, criticism is criticism. Abuse is not criticism. This is exactly why we have so many different words. Each and every single one has its own precise meaning. Just because you can imagine something does not mean you get to tell me what I meant. I meant criticism. Like this. Criticising you for blaming me for something I did not do, based entirely on your own erroneous understanding of the meaning of words.
To continue with my example of cricism, there is a term for individuals who cannot understand the written word. That word is illiterate. You in other words would seem to be illiterate. Technically, illiteracy means one who cannot read the words. So perhaps you are not technically illiterate. There is however also reading comprehension. The ability to not just say the words but understand their meaning. Certainly beyond a shadow of a doubt your comment demonstrates extremely poor reading comprehension.
This is criticsm, cleeds. Not abuse. Criticsm. All the criticsm I am able to throw at you. Because you deserve it. For saying my perfectly sensible post is abusive and deserves to be removed.
Is it abusive to say you might well want to consider getting and using a dictionary? Could be. Maybe you consider learning abusive too. Would go a long ways to understanding some of the stuff you write.
And those posts - "as much criticism as we can throw at them" - are often deleted by the moderators, and rightly so. What you describe is abusive.
No cleeds, criticism is criticism. Abuse is not criticism. This is exactly why we have so many different words. Each and every single one has its own precise meaning. Just because you can imagine something does not mean you get to tell me what I meant. I meant criticism. Like this. Criticising you for blaming me for something I did not do, based entirely on your own erroneous understanding of the meaning of words.
To continue with my example of cricism, there is a term for individuals who cannot understand the written word. That word is illiterate. You in other words would seem to be illiterate. Technically, illiteracy means one who cannot read the words. So perhaps you are not technically illiterate. There is however also reading comprehension. The ability to not just say the words but understand their meaning. Certainly beyond a shadow of a doubt your comment demonstrates extremely poor reading comprehension.
This is criticsm, cleeds. Not abuse. Criticsm. All the criticsm I am able to throw at you. Because you deserve it. For saying my perfectly sensible post is abusive and deserves to be removed.
Is it abusive to say you might well want to consider getting and using a dictionary? Could be. Maybe you consider learning abusive too. Would go a long ways to understanding some of the stuff you write.