My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
I heard the Nagra classic amp and preamp here in my room and i was like omg...who buys this? 🤔
@jay. I can't speak about the "classic " series,  as I've never auditioned it.  However,  the Nagra HD HV pre is a winner/keeper; all the usual caveats - my room, amps, ancillary gear and musical taste.  I would however,  immediately replace it with the Koda 15se...

Jose
Around 2016/2017 Nagra got a new designer who voiced the HD series which made a huge step in the right direction, the Classic series is not close to the current Nagra HD sonics. In a similar manner, Daryl Wilson's designs took Wilson in a better direction.
Ouch!  I beg to differ, i knew David Wilson personally there was no one more dedicated to bring real live sound into the home.
Around 4 years ago I heard the Nagra Classic line amp + preamp along with Wilson Sabrina's, Aurender W20, dCS Bartok I think, plus Transparent power cables and I forget what other wire. It was very good. My impression was different than Jays, but mine was from a 3-4 hour audition, I did not hear it in my home.
Yeah, I have to say this hobby is so subjective. I am actually an Essence owner but Nagra Classic has many attributes that Gryphon Essence doesn't have, and some of them are good, some of them are bad. If you like a more warm sound but with a certain level of transparency and clarity, go for Essence. But if you like absolute transparency and clarity, you go for Nagra classic line. Now I am just wondering how does Dan Progression, which is a similar price to an Essence, sound among the three.
@logydoghan. When auditioning those brands, I was interested in a new line stage and did not compare amps.  I don't have any experience with the particular models mentioned.  I use Gryphon Mephisto Solos for amplification. Not only is this hobby subjective,  but the end results can/may vary once set up in YOUR room.  I am NOT a fanboy of any manufacturer;  like most in this forum,  im searching for true fidelity.   Having said that,  i am very fond of  the PASS XS sound (i owned them).

Good luck in your search, 
Jose
@jg2077 Did you find a good line stage? I have tried Gryphon Pandora but didn't like it. I think Gryphon's amp is much better than their pre-amp. It is very very hard to find a good preamp. I am using the DAC to Amp direct now because I failed to find a good line stage.
Pandora needs world class powercords and so do the Gryphon amps. If you haven’t done that, you haven’t heard the full potential of either. Been saying this on my videos for quite sometime.
Soulution 725 sounds amazing with Gryphon but it is rare for it to show up on the used market.
Jay,
Did you ever try the Orange or (according to some) the even better Quantum Science fuses in your Gryphon gear? If not, you have never heard their "full potential".

So, whatever happened with all the orange fuses you got in? We heard hardly a peep. Are you going to try the Quantum Science fuses? Seems so silly to talk about $5-10K power cords and not try a couple hundred dollar fuse as well.

And what about the connections between the Pandora power supply and the main preamp box. No doubt you tried all the latest contact enhancers like PPT, Mad Scientist, and now the raved about High Fidelity Cable goop !?!

"Full potential" means you try everything possible. Unless you cannot afford it.

The word "tweak".....simply means trying different things to improve something.  Power cords, interconnects, ground enhancers, footers, stands, room treatments, cable risers, fuses, adding extra mass, damping things, room tuning jobbies, moving the speakers around, etc, into infinity are all "tweaks".....so don't tell me you are not a tweaker.
I tried fuses and they made a difference. I can recommend those fuses to anyone.
That said, i don’t have time to embark on "deep" tweaking. The deep tweaking is left for those who want to finish off the system they will stay with for some time. I am not the person to have any system for the long haul. This is why I don’t dive in those waters. I’m not saying that what you mentioned won’t make a difference but i am way too busy with the "macros" than "micros" of my life. The macros also seem to be more important in my life and provide me with greater satisfaction, but I’m not saying this is the case for everyone though. 
@logydoghan. Yes, i auditioned all the preamps i listed earlier; in my room.  Seriously consider a Nagra HD HV.  It was miles better than Pandora.  I use Audioquest Dragon PC on all my components.  I do admit,  i have never tried replacing fuses.  All of my components sit on HRS racks, CMS platforms,  SRA shelves and Minus K isolation base; or whatever i can afford.  The room is treated with ASC and Real Traps and Accoustic Geometry for diffusion. 

@Jay. Very well said and duly noted. 

Gentlemen,  this is all subjective. 

Respectfully, 
Jose


CH Precision L1 sounds amazing with Mephisto. It is as if a preamp is not the system at all. This is of course in my system, someone’s else result may be different. I really hope that Jay will try CH gear one of these days. Maybe even the new 10 series!
https://www.ch-precision.com/ch-cat/series/10-series/
One day i might. I still have not even completely enjoyed the Soulution 725. I have not used it in like 2-3 weeks. 
Huge thanks, everyone. Gryphon Essence vs Dan Progression. Anyone has compared the two?
Essence all day long. I've had the progression stereo behind closed doors. Great amp but it ain't no essence. 
I am going to listen to Dan Progression preamp vs ARC Ref 6SE later this month, to replace my current Ref 5SE.

How about the Gryphon Essence preamp vs these two.

Thanks.


You should go listen without having other people's opinions first. This way you are not biased or influenced by others. Go listen and you should form your own opinion. 
Thanks Jay! Gryphon should put you on their payroll given the fact that you have helped sold more Essence than a dealer lol!
Also Jay: sounds like you have tried a lot of amplifiers that you have never talked about before. Hope someday you can share your opinions on all of those you've tried behind closed doors! Many thanks!
Yes, exactly, best to decide with your own ears.

No chance to compare Gryphon to Dan/ARC, so will try elsewhere.
Definitely I want to hear them also, given all the positive reports.
Thanks.



Tune in tomorrow:
I will rank the 4 Gryphon amplifiers I've owned. Find out which one is #1. 
Shocking results!

https://youtu.be/k3Vj1JQcFVk
I tried a single Nagra Classic on YG, but didn’t think it had enough power to really comment further. 

Nagra was designed with Verity, so very different than Wilson and Magico. Id wager based on what I heard it would be great with Sonus or even my Fynes.
Pokey77 liked the Nagra Classic in a system, and Logydoghan found Nagra Classic more neutral and transparent than Gryphon Essence.  Neutrality and transparency allow the character of other components such as speakers to be heard more truthfully.  It doesn't matter which speakers are used by amp designers. An accurate amp will make any speaker and the whole audio system sound more accurate/transparent.  Nagra has a top reputation in pro audio for accuracy.  I got great results in my recording activities with my Parasonic DAT pro recorder, but I lusted for the open reel Nagra-D digital recorder which was $25K in 1995.  Before digital, Nagra electronics and analog recorders were top rated by pros.
Hi Jay,

I understand that you are using an Aurender W20 as your source, and understand that you are happy with that. However I wonder if you are able to loan or get a deal for the excellent Laufer Teknik Memory Player 64 music server? I believe at the level you are playing at, this is truly one of the few servers that will bring out the best in your super high end set up.

You have already tested power cords, pre amps, amps and speakers, and perhaps even more enjoyment can be gleaned from the music server end of the chain. 

Really enjoying the content you post here and on YouTube.






No plans at this time to bring that music server. The W20se has been sold since last week. My system is running but without a music server and without the level of cables I've normally had in here. 
I plan to have a new music server in the next 3-5 weeks. 

That's cool, looking forward to see which music server you are brining in. :)
Jay - speaking of music servers, do you think a dCS Rossini is good enough for most of the high-end systems? I have auditioned Rossini vs Vivaldi but didn't notice that much of a difference. Rossini v Bartok the difference is significant though.
Rossini is fine without a music server. Get the clock before the server. 
Rossini is one great unit and i found it quite impressive for the money.
I have been through multiple speakers in your previous playlists, from your old Sasha DAW, Alexia 2, Focal, Alexx, Magico M6, to the now big Alexandria. And I realize one thing: Yes, sources, electronics, cables, and racks will change the tone and color; may bring more resolutions and details. But the size of the speakers/drivers still plays the most important factor (of course they have to be manufactured by a great audio company, which includes all of the above) The Alexandria simply throws away all of their smaller siblings, smaller Magico, smaller Focal, no matter what electronics you feed them. You could put a Mcintosh or Parasound or NAD on this and can simply sound amazing in terms of sound stage, scale, and fullness. I guess the only speakers you can beat this are probably Wilson WAMM ($855,000) Magico M9 ($750,000) or the MBL 101X-treme ($263,000 but you will need the whole MBL set-up which could come to half a mil total) or the biggest Kharma (EV 1D $812,500)... size does matter, in this business
My biggest takeaway from your channel is that the diminishing of returns in speakers is far less than other components. Yes you can argue maybe a BMW X5 is better than Audi Q5, or a Mercedes G class is better than a range rover, that's fine I wouldn't argue that. That's what I learned about Gryphon, Dan, Constellation, Soulution, etc...Different people have different tastes. But if you are saying a Corolla or Audi A4 is better than a Bentley Mulsanne, man sorry I can hardly agree with you. So instead of spending a crazy amount of money on cables, electronics, racks, stands, etc... focus on speakers first, that is still the most important thing that affects your sound. If you save that ten grand cable money, or that 15 grand rack money, or even that dCS Vivaldi money, you can a get much better pair of speakers.
Post removed 
Logydoghan,
Yes, get the best speaker you can afford, which is not necessarily the most costly.  The Wilson XVX, Master Chronosonic are too big for some rooms.  I like the brilliant HF of the XLF, so even with a large room, the XLF might be the best performer.  It also has the largest bass drivers of the top Wilsons, so bass could be most commanding on the XLF compared to the others.
Thanks for the points you made.  I'm not sure it's always the case though.    I think WC had the Alexx with Boulder electronics, and I'm not sure if he's surpassed that yet in listening to the videos.   Yes, the current Wilson that WC owns has the brilliant HF that is mentioned by viber6, and in some folks minds that makes it better.   For me, I have not yet heard a video of WC's with the XLF that surpasses the videos of the Alexx with the Boulder electronics.   Perhaps it's just my preferences and/or perhaps being in the room would make me feel differently.

Dave
@thezaks Thank you for your comments. You are exactly right. The Alexx was a newer model and they were more refined in HF. I could argue maybe the Magico or Estelon or other brand speakers which use diamond/ceramic/other high-tech materials may produce more accurate highs. I am just saying in terms of scale and a real PA feeling most of these can't beat XLF. I compare Jay's High Water Everywhere (Live) in Alexia 2, Alexx, and XLF vs the real live show on Youtube. You can clearly hear that even the XLF can't reach the level of a real-world drum in terms of bass extension. I guess if one uses a 20 inches taiko the difference is more evident. If you want to listen to some vocals, some piano or violin sonatas, you can choose any of those speakers and can enjoy music. But if you want to bring a real death metal or Mahler symphony 8 concert into your home, XLF is the closest to the deal. So it depends on taste and practicality. It's better if you think Alexx is good enough for you because you can save HALF of your money on the speakers :)

PS. quote JA on Alexx vs XLF: But when Michael asked me if the measurements confirmed that he should sell his Alexandrias and buy the Alexxes, I'm afraid I punted. As much as I agree with Michael about the superiority of the Alexx's midrange and highs, I missed the Alexandria's lows.—John Atkinson
The lows are just astonishing. If you come here in my room and i blast "death row" by Chris Stapleton, your head would fall off your shoulders.
I am actually SHOCKED that many of you have never really thought about this:

Reviewer A takes delivery of a serious set of speakers to review, but he uses HIS REFERENCE amps with HIS REFERENCE cables. After the review is done, he says the speakers did not have incredible bass, BUT nowhere on the review do we see if other amps were tried? other cables? What if this "reference" amp sucks to control world-class speakers?
This is something that many of you fail to understand each and every time. It is not just the speaker, but also the supporting cast. Most reviewers use whatever they own and then they give their opinion.
This is like saying: (this is an example)
I use NITTO tires for a stock 700HP Shelby GT500 with great results. i have excellent traction and they hook on the pavement pretty good. Next week, i send the car in to get more boost, headers, exhaust, tune and now it has 1,000 hp, but fail to understand that those NITTO tires won’t do the job anymore. Now i need to think about buying MICKEY THOMPSON slicks or else i will be spinning tires everywhere.

Stay tuned for this video:

https://youtu.be/hw-mQbhMVpg
logydoghan,
So, I'm not saying that I think Alexx straight up sounds better than XLF.  I'm including amplification in the picture.  I'm saying that, for me, WC's videos of the  Alexx with Boulder electronics is better than the XLF with lesser electronics.  I'm not sure one can just get the bigger and more expensive speakers and call it a day. 

However, that's just videos.  It's great to get WC's feedback, because he's actually in the room and can give us all a better idea of the true sonics.

Dave
Jay needs a new power conditioner... both Shunyatas Everests are sold and i am using a Nordost Qbase Mk2 and it is bright as hell lol


Weren't you going to try an SR Powercell?  I'm guessing Nordost might not have synergy with the XLF.

Dave
yes, the SR Powercell will be here either this or next week. I also have the following coming:

  1. new speaker cables
  2. new xlr's
  3. new usb cable
  4. new ethernet cable
  5. potentially (99% sure) a new set of monos
  6. music server (next month)
Right now, my system sounds cold, bright, shrill, and making me watch movies in the living room :) 

Interesting comments by Jay on the XLF.  Kren0006 and I had a debate about what was responsible for the more brilliant HF on the XLF vs Alexx.  Jay just reaffirmed that the XLF tweeter is probably not responsible, but more likely the crossover design is the main factor.  For whatever the reason, the XLF is clearly (pun intended) more brilliant than the Alexx in HF.  

I understand the position of thezaks that the Alexx + Boulder electronics sound better than XLF + lesser electronics.  Somewhat an apples/oranges comparison, because on videos of the same speaker, the Boulder was demonstrated to be more detailed and neutral than the Gryphon Mephisto, esp noted by mrdecibel at the time.  I then posted A/B videos of the Alexx and XLF on the same song, and admitted that the Alexx was not far behind the midrange/HF detail and clarity of the XLF.  It is obvious that the XLF bass is totally more commanding than the Alexx bass.

Way back, I posted that my Rane EQ used with any large Wilson could provide superiority in many sonic criteria to that of the flagship speakers such as the Chronosonics but without the EQ.  No, the EQ could not let the Alexx have the same large scale of the XLF, XVX and flagship Master Chronosonic, but for important midrange/HF detail and clarity, EQ can greatly enhance any of these great speakers.  The effect of EQ is much larger than the relatively subtle differences between great amps.  Still, I go for the most transparent electronics and use my EQ to improve things further.

Jay, one point of disagreement.  If you are playing the XLF at 82 dB with peaks up to 100 dB, the 90+ dB of efficiency will need only 0.1 watts most of the time, and less than 100 watts on the peaks.  This is true outside the low bass, where hearing sensitivity is much less, so 1000 watts are needed for loud 120 dB low bass peaks.  Spaciousness is best enjoyed at moderate SPL's, so you found the 50 watt Gryphon Essence to be all anyone would need.  I believe the explanation for your findings about increased spaciousness from the higher power amps is that these amps have that type of intrinsic sound quality at both low and high power.  Even a modest 100 watt ARC tube amp would provide lots of spaciousness that would be different from the accurate/focused type of sound from Boulder or other SS amps.  The same enhanced spaciousness might apply to euphonic amps like Luxman, D'Ag.  For 40 years I have observed this dichotomy between euphonic amps with their increased spaciousness but sacrificed clarity, and transparent/detailed amps which emphasize clarity at the price of spaciousness, depth.
Actually I think WC just said in the video that low power amps like the Essence (he hasn’t really had any other low power amps with XLF so that must have been what he meant) made the XLF sound one dimensional. 

Only the new high power amps he has now make it sound spacious, because of the headroom. So just the opposite of what Viber just said. Low power amps and XLF are a bad match according to WC (who is in the room and not just theorizing like Viber). 

Viber you should watch the video again because you are continuing to make the same mistake WC specifically cautioned against in the video and said listen closely. It is not about volume. It is about spaciousness. Low power amps can make XLF play loudly, but not well.